Trumps court loss are piling up

Perfectly relevant as it challenges you to explain what you voted for.

Seems you can't.

And clearly not beating a dead horse, as folks like you are pleased, it appears, to see the policy agenda I provided in place of Trump's.


Bet you can't come up with 5 or 6 Trump policies you would reverse.

This is about Trump losing in almost every single court case.

View attachment 425824



This was the question you've dodged:

Perfectly relevant as it challenges you to explain what you voted for.


Is it fear of the cancel culture?

I'm disappointed in you.

You're shifting the goal posts.

Go wallow in your Orange God's bizarre conspiracy laden pity party.


Simply admit that there is no way to defend what you voted for, you did so out of cowardice, out of a need to go along to get along, and, as the religion of Militant Secularism demands, this is what you have succumbed to:


copying the ancient Hebrews, ….with talismans to ward off punishment.



"In order to escape cathartic rage, he must prove his innocence by virtue signaling—or more accurately, by innocence-signaling—his support for various social justice causes, so that he, like other groups of innocents, can be covered with righteousness.


Only when covered in this way does the cathartic rage that brings social death pass over him and settle elsewhere, as it must. The Hebrews of ancient times were told by God that death would pass over their houses, and no one in their households would die, if they marked their front doors with the innocent blood of a slain lamb. Today in America, the white, heterosexual man must reenact a version of that innocence- signaling liturgy if social death is to pass over him.

Jews in America celebrate Passover once a year; if cathartic rage is to pass over the white, heterosexual man, he must celebrate the identity politics version of that liturgy daily, by displaying signs of innocence on his front door—or, more likely, his office door—for all to see. If you doubt this, wander through the university and college buildings in America that house the offices of our professors. You will soon discover ample evidence of this strange identity politics Passover ritual. Decals that declare, “This office is Green”; pictures of Foucault; dated posters announcing Martin Luther King Jr.

Day celebrations; an announcement about upcoming “Diversity Training”; yet another New York Times article taped to a professor’s office door that thinly masks its hatred of President Trump—if you display these symbols of your innocence, or of your sympathy with the innocents, social death will surely pass you by. The displays on the office doors of corporate America are no different.”
Joshua Mitchell, "American Awakening."



I don't believe you can be happy under this sort of Democrat dictatorship.
 

  1. President Donald Trump and his legal allies earned a platinum sombrero Friday, striking out five times in a matter of hours in states pivotal to the president’s push to overturn the election results — and losing a sixth in Minnesota for good measure.

    And Trump allies' losing streak continued Saturday when the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a suit brought by Wood over absentee ballots and recount procedures just hours before the president was scheduled to campaign there ahead of the state's Senate runoffs. The majority opinion was written by Chief Judge William Pryor, who is considered one of the most conservative George W. Bush appointees on the appellate bench.

    A Nevada judge issued a point-by-point rejection of every claim lodged by the Trump team, emphasizing that the facts they presented were sparse and unpersuasive. Carson City District Judge James Russell’s opinion repeatedly emphasized their case would not have succeeded “under any standard of proof.”

    In one of the most prominent cases — a suit in Georgia brought by controversial lawyers Sidney Powell and Lin Wood — a federal appeals court dismissed an appeal seeking to expand a restraining order a district court judge issued Sunday barring any alterations to voting machines in three Georgia counties. A unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the appeal without even hearing oral arguments from the litigants.

    It was another harsh milestone in a month long run of legal futility, accompanied by sharp rebukes from county, state and federal judges who continue to express shock at the Trump team’s effort to simply scrap the results of an election he lost. Several of the most devastating opinions, both Friday and in recent weeks, have come from conservative judges and, in some federal cases, Trump appointees.


    Trump supporters: Do any of you see a pattern here?
    Your "stable genius" is lying to you about election fraud!
    :oops:


    ReplyQuoteEditRemove
Post Reply

Trump and his lawyers don't sweat losses from those liberal courts. Their main objective is to get their case before the SCOTUS. They know before going to a state court that they will get dismissed. They won that pathetic impeachment case. This voting fraud will be a piece of cake. MAGA!
 
1-47 in court.

And not one single accusation of fraud has held up.

It's cost the Trump team roughly $10 million in legal and consulting fees in this clown car shit show attempt to overturn an election for the first time in American history, putting us on par with third world "shit hole" countries.

In the mean time, Trump's PAC has raised $200 million.

And fleecing the rubes is what this is about.
Did any of these judges disprove the voter fraud? Did anyone explain the numbers? Did anyone explain why signature validation was never done? Nope. Just paid partisan hacks refusing to act against the Democrat establishment.
 

  1. President Donald Trump and his legal allies earned a platinum sombrero Friday, striking out five times in a matter of hours in states pivotal to the president’s push to overturn the election results — and losing a sixth in Minnesota for good measure.

    And Trump allies' losing streak continued Saturday when the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a suit brought by Wood over absentee ballots and recount procedures just hours before the president was scheduled to campaign there ahead of the state's Senate runoffs. The majority opinion was written by Chief Judge William Pryor, who is considered one of the most conservative George W. Bush appointees on the appellate bench.

    A Nevada judge issued a point-by-point rejection of every claim lodged by the Trump team, emphasizing that the facts they presented were sparse and unpersuasive. Carson City District Judge James Russell’s opinion repeatedly emphasized their case would not have succeeded “under any standard of proof.”

    In one of the most prominent cases — a suit in Georgia brought by controversial lawyers Sidney Powell and Lin Wood — a federal appeals court dismissed an appeal seeking to expand a restraining order a district court judge issued Sunday barring any alterations to voting machines in three Georgia counties. A unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the appeal without even hearing oral arguments from the litigants.

    It was another harsh milestone in a month long run of legal futility, accompanied by sharp rebukes from county, state and federal judges who continue to express shock at the Trump team’s effort to simply scrap the results of an election he lost. Several of the most devastating opinions, both Friday and in recent weeks, have come from conservative judges and, in some federal cases, Trump appointees.


    Trump supporters: Do any of you see a pattern here?
    Your "stable genius" is lying to you about election fraud!
    :oops:


    ReplyQuoteEditRemove
Post Reply

Trump and his lawyers don't sweat losses from those liberal courts. Their main objective is to get their case before the SCOTUS. They know before going to a state court that they will get dismissed. They won that pathetic impeachment case. This voting fraud will be a piece of cake. MAGA!


I don't have the optimism that you have, Hossy......

Time to recognize that they have spent three generations preparing for this moment, the theft of the election and the theft of America's heritage.


  1. The radicals of the sixties did not remain within the universities…They realized that the apocalypse never materialized. “…they were dropping off into environmentalism and consumerism and fatalism…I watched many of my old comrades apply to graduate school in universities they had failed to burn down, so they could get advanced degrees and spread the ideas that had been discredited in the streets under an academic cover.” Collier and Horowitz, “Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About The Sixties,” p. 294-295.
  2. “The radicals were not likely to go into business or the conventional practice of the professions. They were part of the chattering class, talkers interested in policy, politics, culture. They went into politics, print and electronic journalism, church bureaucracies, foundation staffs, Hollywood careers, public interest organizations, anywhere attitudes and opinions could be influenced. And they are exerting influence.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 51
  3. “[The radicals] did not go away or change their minds; the New Left shattered into a multitude of single-issue groups. We now have, to name a few, radical feminists, black extremists, animal rights groups, radical environmentalists, activist homosexual organizations, multiculturalists, organizations such as People for the American Way, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Planned Parenthood.” Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” p. 53
 

  1. President Donald Trump and his legal allies earned a platinum sombrero Friday, striking out five times in a matter of hours in states pivotal to the president’s push to overturn the election results — and losing a sixth in Minnesota for good measure.

    And Trump allies' losing streak continued Saturday when the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a suit brought by Wood over absentee ballots and recount procedures just hours before the president was scheduled to campaign there ahead of the state's Senate runoffs. The majority opinion was written by Chief Judge William Pryor, who is considered one of the most conservative George W. Bush appointees on the appellate bench.

    A Nevada judge issued a point-by-point rejection of every claim lodged by the Trump team, emphasizing that the facts they presented were sparse and unpersuasive. Carson City District Judge James Russell’s opinion repeatedly emphasized their case would not have succeeded “under any standard of proof.”

    In one of the most prominent cases — a suit in Georgia brought by controversial lawyers Sidney Powell and Lin Wood — a federal appeals court dismissed an appeal seeking to expand a restraining order a district court judge issued Sunday barring any alterations to voting machines in three Georgia counties. A unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the appeal without even hearing oral arguments from the litigants.

    It was another harsh milestone in a month long run of legal futility, accompanied by sharp rebukes from county, state and federal judges who continue to express shock at the Trump team’s effort to simply scrap the results of an election he lost. Several of the most devastating opinions, both Friday and in recent weeks, have come from conservative judges and, in some federal cases, Trump appointees.


    Trump supporters: Do any of you see a pattern here?
    Your "stable genius" is lying to you about election fraud!
    :oops:


    ReplyQuoteEditRemove
Post Reply
But are you saying that a crappy affidavit is not evidence?
 
Good!

The job of the Supreme Court is to rule via the Constitution.

And they are going so say "There have been 48 cases in federal and state courts in eight different states, and not one single piece of evidence of fraud offered by the plaintiffs has stood up. Why do you think we will rule in your favor if it has been repeatedly shot down in the lower courts?"

Trump's partisans are clinging to this false hope that the SCOTUS is just a crass partisan body that will rule in favor of Trump because there are six conservative justices as opposed to upholding the rule of law.

Who knows what the Supreme Court will say?

It doesn't matter the political persuasion of the Justices - they are to rule by the Constitution.

/end story
 

  1. President Donald Trump and his legal allies earned a platinum sombrero Friday, striking out five times in a matter of hours in states pivotal to the president’s push to overturn the election results — and losing a sixth in Minnesota for good measure.

    And Trump allies' losing streak continued Saturday when the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a suit brought by Wood over absentee ballots and recount procedures just hours before the president was scheduled to campaign there ahead of the state's Senate runoffs. The majority opinion was written by Chief Judge William Pryor, who is considered one of the most conservative George W. Bush appointees on the appellate bench.

    A Nevada judge issued a point-by-point rejection of every claim lodged by the Trump team, emphasizing that the facts they presented were sparse and unpersuasive. Carson City District Judge James Russell’s opinion repeatedly emphasized their case would not have succeeded “under any standard of proof.”

    In one of the most prominent cases — a suit in Georgia brought by controversial lawyers Sidney Powell and Lin Wood — a federal appeals court dismissed an appeal seeking to expand a restraining order a district court judge issued Sunday barring any alterations to voting machines in three Georgia counties. A unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the appeal without even hearing oral arguments from the litigants.

    It was another harsh milestone in a month long run of legal futility, accompanied by sharp rebukes from county, state and federal judges who continue to express shock at the Trump team’s effort to simply scrap the results of an election he lost. Several of the most devastating opinions, both Friday and in recent weeks, have come from conservative judges and, in some federal cases, Trump appointees.


    Trump supporters: Do any of you see a pattern here?
    Your "stable genius" is lying to you about election fraud!
    :oops:


    ReplyQuoteEditRemove
Post Reply
The only, ONLY thing the impeached president trump's devoted RWNJs see in his repeated court losses are how many crooked jurists there are involved in the Democrats' conspiracy to steal their cheeto-in-chief's second term.

Nothing, NOTHING can convince them differently. Just as their own deaths from the COVID-19 coronavirus are denied to their dying breaths. There is not a lie told by the impeached president trump or echoed by his enablers the RWNJs can muster up the courage to disbelieve. The only cults with more members worship their long-imagined deities.

.

.
Another slave heading to the slave pen of ignore. I used to shake my head at the stupidity of any progressive who would actually vote their freedoms away for a welfare check, today, i expect it because of how stupid the prog slave has become.
See picture below.

says the guy who votes others freedoms and well being away for his own privileged life...
 
Good!

The job of the Supreme Court is to rule via the Constitution.

And they are going so say "There have been 48 cases in federal and state courts in eight different states, and not one single piece of evidence of fraud offered by the plaintiffs has stood up. Why do you think we will rule in your favor if it has been repeatedly shot down in the lower courts?"

Trump's partisans are clinging to this false hope that the SCOTUS is just a crass partisan body that will rule in favor of Trump because there are six conservative justices as opposed to upholding the rule of law.

Who knows what the Supreme Court will say?

It doesn't matter the political persuasion of the Justices - they are to rule by the Constitution.

/end story

Until they rule against Trump and you will then proclaim those Justices to be ruling against the Constitution and declare their ruling to be voided because it did not favor Donald the Marvelous...
 

  1. President Donald Trump and his legal allies earned a platinum sombrero Friday, striking out five times in a matter of hours in states pivotal to the president’s push to overturn the election results — and losing a sixth in Minnesota for good measure.

    And Trump allies' losing streak continued Saturday when the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a suit brought by Wood over absentee ballots and recount procedures just hours before the president was scheduled to campaign there ahead of the state's Senate runoffs. The majority opinion was written by Chief Judge William Pryor, who is considered one of the most conservative George W. Bush appointees on the appellate bench.

    A Nevada judge issued a point-by-point rejection of every claim lodged by the Trump team, emphasizing that the facts they presented were sparse and unpersuasive. Carson City District Judge James Russell’s opinion repeatedly emphasized their case would not have succeeded “under any standard of proof.”

    In one of the most prominent cases — a suit in Georgia brought by controversial lawyers Sidney Powell and Lin Wood — a federal appeals court dismissed an appeal seeking to expand a restraining order a district court judge issued Sunday barring any alterations to voting machines in three Georgia counties. A unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the appeal without even hearing oral arguments from the litigants.

    It was another harsh milestone in a month long run of legal futility, accompanied by sharp rebukes from county, state and federal judges who continue to express shock at the Trump team’s effort to simply scrap the results of an election he lost. Several of the most devastating opinions, both Friday and in recent weeks, have come from conservative judges and, in some federal cases, Trump appointees.


    Trump supporters: Do any of you see a pattern here?
    Your "stable genius" is lying to you about election fraud!
    :oops:


    ReplyQuoteEditRemove
Post Reply

Unfortunately there are piling up. President Trump, as he has done for the last 4 years, is still fighting for Americans. He may very well lose this battle against corruption, but the man is not going down without a fight.

He’s the last of the great ones.
 
Keep bumping them up until they get to the SC.

Exactly!

USSC already rejected one, and will reject the rest and then those like you will proclaim the USSC which has three Trump appointed Justices on it as being rogue and deep state!

if they had any shame, they wouldnt call a voting system that elected their orange thing the president in the last election "a rogue system"...

but they have none...

not even a drop of it...
 
Keep bumping them up until they get to the SC.

Exactly!

USSC already rejected one, and will reject the rest and then those like you will proclaim the USSC which has three Trump appointed Justices on it as being rogue and deep state!

if they had any shame, they wouldnt call a voting system that elected their orange thing the president in the last election "a rogue system"...

but they have none...

not even a drop of it...

The funny part they keep on mentioning Dominion software and machines and how it cheated Trump in those four states but did not cheat in the twenty other states...

They want people to believe in States that were battleground those Machines were faulty and hacked while ignoring twenty other States had no issue!

Then they want to complain about how those four States changed their voting laws due to the Pandemic but want us to ignore the damn fact Texas own Governor issued executive orders right before the election that were brought to the courts...

Also if Texas had any issue with those four States about what they did before the election why didn’t they file injunction with the courts before the election and waited until December 8th 2020?

Simple, this is a last ditch effort that they know will be rejected but trying to convince enough people that the election was stolen from Trump when it was not!

They ask how could Trump lose while Democrats failed to take the Senate and did not gain in the House but loss seats and the answer is Trump is that unpopular!

The voting system was not rigged nor was there enough fraud to overturn the election and Trump knows this but he has to play his base so he can get them to donate to that fund he has so he can live off their stupidity for the rest of his life!

In the end these fools have been played by the worst Charlatan in history and it tell you how pathetic the voters have become in this damn country when you have seventy plus million people voting for a man that think they are just gullible fools that will believe anything he spews!
 
Keep bumping them up until they get to the SC.

Exactly!

USSC already rejected one, and will reject the rest and then those like you will proclaim the USSC which has three Trump appointed Justices on it as being rogue and deep state!

if they had any shame, they wouldnt call a voting system that elected their orange thing the president in the last election "a rogue system"...

but they have none...

not even a drop of it...
Probably the most interesting four years of our lifetimes. Both history books and psychology books will be written about how a person like this could rise to power here. It's a reflection on us as a whole, and we badly need to examine that.

Europe learned after what happened there in the 30s and 40s. I'm sure we will too. Fortunately, our political system has held, even if by a thread. That's the difference between us and them -- we have the better, stronger system. Phew.
 
Last edited:
Good!

The job of the Supreme Court is to rule via the Constitution.

And they are going so say "There have been 48 cases in federal and state courts in eight different states, and not one single piece of evidence of fraud offered by the plaintiffs has stood up. Why do you think we will rule in your favor if it has been repeatedly shot down in the lower courts?"

Trump's partisans are clinging to this false hope that the SCOTUS is just a crass partisan body that will rule in favor of Trump because there are six conservative justices as opposed to upholding the rule of law.

Who knows what the Supreme Court will say?

It doesn't matter the political persuasion of the Justices - they are to rule by the Constitution.

/end story

Until they rule against Trump and you will then proclaim those Justices to be ruling against the Constitution and declare their ruling to be voided because it did not favor Donald the Marvelous...


Keep dreaming.

You obviously have no idea where or what my convictions are.

toodles
 
Unfortunately there are piling up. President Trump, as he has done for the last 4 years, is still fighting for Americans. He may very well lose this battle against corruption, but the man is not going down without a fight.

He’s the last of the great ones.

Yep, I agree. As a grifter he's pretty good.
 
Good!

The job of the Supreme Court is to rule via the Constitution.

And they are going so say "There have been 48 cases in federal and state courts in eight different states, and not one single piece of evidence of fraud offered by the plaintiffs has stood up. Why do you think we will rule in your favor if it has been repeatedly shot down in the lower courts?"

Trump's partisans are clinging to this false hope that the SCOTUS is just a crass partisan body that will rule in favor of Trump because there are six conservative justices as opposed to upholding the rule of law.

Who knows what the Supreme Court will say?

It doesn't matter the political persuasion of the Justices - they are to rule by the Constitution.

/end story

Until they rule against Trump and you will then proclaim those Justices to be ruling against the Constitution and declare their ruling to be voided because it did not favor Donald the Marvelous...


Keep dreaming.

You obviously have no idea where or what my convictions are.

toodles

Sure thing!

You have been spewing Pro-Trump bias nonsense and you will proclaim the USSC is rogue if they fail to rule In favor for Trump...

I will tie this response to you when you do it and then watch you claim that I misunderstood what you wrote!
 
Good!

The job of the Supreme Court is to rule via the Constitution.

And they are going so say "There have been 48 cases in federal and state courts in eight different states, and not one single piece of evidence of fraud offered by the plaintiffs has stood up. Why do you think we will rule in your favor if it has been repeatedly shot down in the lower courts?"

Trump's partisans are clinging to this false hope that the SCOTUS is just a crass partisan body that will rule in favor of Trump because there are six conservative justices as opposed to upholding the rule of law.

Who knows what the Supreme Court will say?

It doesn't matter the political persuasion of the Justices - they are to rule by the Constitution.

/end story


I hope they do.....but I am not as optimistic as you are.
 
Keep bumping them up until they get to the SC.

Exactly!

USSC already rejected one, and will reject the rest and then those like you will proclaim the USSC which has three Trump appointed Justices on it as being rogue and deep state!

if they had any shame, they wouldnt call a voting system that elected their orange thing the president in the last election "a rogue system"...

but they have none...

not even a drop of it...

The funny part they keep on mentioning Dominion software and machines and how it cheated Trump in those four states but did not cheat in the twenty other states...

They want people to believe in States that were battleground those Machines were faulty and hacked while ignoring twenty other States had no issue!

Then they want to complain about how those four States changed their voting laws due to the Pandemic but want us to ignore the damn fact Texas own Governor issued executive orders right before the election that were brought to the courts...

Also if Texas had any issue with those four States about what they did before the election why didn’t they file injunction with the courts before the election and waited until December 8th 2020?

Simple, this is a last ditch effort that they know will be rejected but trying to convince enough people that the election was stolen from Trump when it was not!

They ask how could Trump lose while Democrats failed to take the Senate and did not gain in the House but loss seats and the answer is Trump is that unpopular!

The voting system was not rigged nor was there enough fraud to overturn the election and Trump knows this but he has to play his base so he can get them to donate to that fund he has so he can live off their stupidity for the rest of his life!

In the end these fools have been played by the worst Charlatan in history and it tell you how pathetic the voters have become in this damn country when you have seventy plus million people voting for a man that think they are just gullible fools that will believe anything he spews!


it is very likely that the dominion machines flipped votes in the states that Trump won, thereby making his victory margin smaller than it really was. The dominion executives have fled the country, probably to China, why would they do that if the machines were not corrupted?
 
Keep bumping them up until they get to the SC.

Exactly!

USSC already rejected one, and will reject the rest and then those like you will proclaim the USSC which has three Trump appointed Justices on it as being rogue and deep state!

if they had any shame, they wouldnt call a voting system that elected their orange thing the president in the last election "a rogue system"...

but they have none...

not even a drop of it...
Probably the most interesting four years of our lifetimes. Both history books and psychology books will be written about how a person like this could rise to power here. It's a reflection on us as a whole, and we badly need to examine that.

Europe learned after what happened there in the 30s and 40s. I'm sure we will too. Fortunately, our political system has held, even if by a thread. That's the difference between us and them -- we have the better, stronger system. Phew.


your are obviously talking about Obama, your narrative fits him perfectly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top