Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order Reaches the Supreme Court

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

You’re still a moron.

He doesn’t seek to change the Constitution.

He seeks to have it interpreted correctly for a change.

God damn, you’re stupid.

All facts. Especially the last one.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

157 years of case law, and you think TRUMP is the one who is right.

Wow. That's priceless.

Goddam, you're stupid.

There’s 157 years of case law pertaining to people crossing the border illegally, having a kid and becoming a US citizen?
Do tell.

 

[Darkwind]

too funny

you people are against Birthright Citizenship and Trump isn't, not exactly

Trump administration asks Supreme Court to partly allow birthright citizenship restrictions​

"The order would deny citizenship to those born after Feb. 19 whose parents are in the country illegally."

If you are looking for perfection, you are 2000 years to late.

I simply want to put a stop to pregnant women, the fathers of the bastards not being American citizens, giving birth and then making that bastard a US Citizen.

You don't like that? Who cares.

That is the ONLY change being asked for, but of course, you must tell your lies to generate more fear.

The children of illegals follow their parents in political beliefs and if illegals are grateful to Democrats, their children will be as well. The increase of bastards of other nations, born in this nation, creates more Congressional seats and the people who vote for them are the ones the Democrats seek to replace those who have a real American bloodline.

That has been explained to you before, but you feign ignorance, or maybe it isn't an act. I don't care.

The 14th needs to be amended.

SCOTUS will shoot down Trump because the office of the President does not have the authority to amend Constitutionak Amendments. Only Congress does.

 

[BackAgain]

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

157 years of case law, and you think TRUMP is the one who is right.

Wow. That's priceless.

Goddam, you're stupid.

Because all old cases were decided correctly?

You must have been crushed to learn that Plessy v. Ferguson got overturned after over half a century.

Also, there’s this little tidbit which asshole morons, such as you, like to “overlook:”

The suggestion that the children born here to illegal aliens somehow become birthright citizens has actually never been ruled upon by SCOTUS.

You’re a lying scumbag and stupid AF.

 

[kyzr]

The problem is, without re-writing the 14th, it hinges on whether a non-citizen on American soil is subject to the jurisdiction of the USA. If ruled not, then a non-citizen is not subject to US laws on American soil.

No. Its a matter of how illegals are defined. Are they subject to the jurisdiction of the US? They are NOT citizens so their offspring should not be.
Plan-B would be a new Law.
Plan-C would be a new Amendment at the Convention of states, but 38 states seems unlikely.

 

[Rogue AI]

These cases against Trump should all be tossed. The 14th does not give the states any standing. It should be 9-0, but corrupt liberals and wishy washy Roberts are likely to create an illusion of a close ruling.

 

[otto105]

Hopefully Roberts and Barrett show up at court with their heads out of their asses that day. We know all the crooked Democrats will vote against Trump.

The US Constitution is very clear.

He should lose in a snap ruling.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

The problem is, without re-writing the 14th, it hinges on whether a non-citizen on American soil is subject to the jurisdiction of the USA. If ruled not, then a non-citizen is not subject to US laws on American soil.

So how does that work though. As another poster pointed out, if the court rules that they are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction in this one instance, then how does our country enforce ANY of our laws to those in the country unlawfully?

I think it was FrigidWeirdo who brought this up initially here.

 

[Correll]

So how does that work though. As another poster pointed out, if the court rules that they are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction in this one instance, then how does our country enforce ANY of our laws to those in the country unlawfully?

I think it was FrigidWeirdo who brought this up initially here.

We don't. That is the point.

 

[AsherN]

In fact does merely being here automatically make you a citizen via jurisdictional control? It certainly does not for the illegals parents. Plop and drop and you are American is insane

It does not make you a citizen. But the article states people born under the jurisdiction. The parents being here puts them under the jurisdiction.

 

[AsherN]

So how does that work though. As another poster pointed out, if the court rules that they are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction in this one instance, then how does our country enforce ANY of our laws to those in the country unlawfully?

I think it was FrigidWeirdo who brought this up initially here.

Or lawfully. If you are not a citizen, and simply being in the US does not make you under the jurisdiction, then the laws of the US do not apply to you.

 

[Correll]

It does not make you a citizen. But the article states people born under the jurisdiction. The parents being here puts them under the jurisdiction.

A mexican woman in the desert at night, being transported by cartel coyotes, has a baby 10 feet across the border into texas.

That woman, no american even knows she is there.

How is she "under our jurisdiction"?

 

[ThisIsMe]

I guess Il Duce wants to add to his string of losses with the Supreme Court. He believes he can amend the Constitution the UnRight claims to so firmly respect and believe in by diktat.

He's going to be very disappointed.

Trump has never read the Constitution and neither have most of his supporters.

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order Reaches the Supreme Court​

A series of Mr. Trump’s initial policy moves have been blocked nationally by judges who have imposed similar broad injunctions while suits challenging their legality are considered.

It is not clear whether the justices will agree to take up the case as an emergency matter. Even if they reject the Trump administration’s emergency requests, the court could decide to take up the dispute and weigh in on the more central question of whether birthright citizenship is guaranteed in the Constitution once the lawsuits have made their way through the appeals courts.

Lol, talking about not reading the cotus, you can put the leftys in there too, a whole lotta cotus faults there too

Also, it's going to come down to how well the lawyer can argue "jurisdiction"

For the record, I don't think he has a shot at winning, but, I'm curious of how the arguments will go and what path they take.

 

[Correll]

Or lawfully. If you are not a citizen, and simply being in the US does not make you under the jurisdiction, then the laws of the US do not apply to you.

exactly. Just get the **** out. Or kick them the **** out.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

The US Constitution is very clear.

He should lose in a snap ruling.

Yeah, it's clear and as anyone can see, society in general and the legal community specifically, proceeded to ignore what the 14th amendment says for at least another 99 years.

That is, when it comes to the rights of people of African descent—the very group it was both intended and written to protect. They just never quite got on board with the 'actually enforcing it' part."

 

[Moonglow]

Now that is a coming from you.

I only did it enough to where I need glasses

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

You really need help you do understand that right? I really actually feel sorry for you. I think at this point the board just keeps you as the token nut job liberal.

Careful there, your slip is showing...

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

It's always been that way, and always will be.

Actually it would be more accurate to say that it has always been "interpreted" that way.

 

[ThisIsMe]

It should not convey when the parents are not citizens. Citizenry via birth absolute is insane

I'm just curious how the people who wrote the 14th amendment explained why the child would be a citizen but the parents would not? Would that have meant that the child had rights the parents did not? If the child was a citizen and had rights, did that mean the parents could not be deported? If not, then why not just make the whole family citizens?

The idea that they meant for any illegal who got onto US soil and had a baby that was a citizen, just doesn't make sense.

 

[Orangecat]

Try reading

Try thinking.