That's not how red flag laws work. They're not one in the same throughout the nation. One place may actually do some investigation. Another will just take someone's word for it, and take someone else's gun. An ex wife, bad neighbor, etc etc etc
You put way too much faith in government(s) and them getting it right.
Shall not infringe should mean more to Republicans. If so, they wouldn't be defending Trump when he said it.
OMG!
Closely reread my post.
I did NOT support what Trump allegedly said in the link you presented.
I merely pointed out how you mis-read, mis-understood, distorted, and took out of context. Then stretched such into what it isn't.
You have just done the same thing again with my post.
I do not agree with or support Trump in what he said, assuming he actually said it. There's the buried subtext of my post because I'm not certain on the accuracy of what your link says.
I'm not in favor of "red flag" laws, especially in the sloppy way they are currently written and applied.
I do not care for putting any faith in government.
This conservative takes that "shall not infringe" quite seriously.
That's two fails on your part when it comes to basic English; in reading and comprehension, on two different examples. Repeating your need to redo K-12 education which you appear to have flunked the first time around.
As for your "asume", as the quip goes;
When you assume, you make an "ass" out of "u" and "me".
In this case though, almost entirely an "ass" of "u"!
