Majority Of Republicans Now Say That Trump Has Increased Their Cost Of Living. 35% Job Approval Rating Overall For Trump.

[protectionist]

So, 'Just trust you, bro!' How about, no? You haven't laid out anything beyond your anecdotal feelz here. So now you're a victim for voting for an orange bag 'O shyt?

Notice the word "anecdotal" in the quote post.
Liberals have the VERY strange notion that anecdotal information is illegitimate, and only "information" derived from scientific analysis studies are acceptable.

Not only do they think this, but they think the general public HA HA is with them on this.

This is one of the most clear examples of how reality detatched these dupes are.

Oh yeah, libs. Completely disregard all common sense and everything you SEE & HEAR with your own EYES & EARS, no matter how obvious it is, and just rely on what some media reporter, university think tank, etc (of course friendly to them) as to say from all their illustrious and oh so prestigious "studies". Pheeew!!

Although this post should be the end of it, if you want to further the debate, I'll cite a couple more instances of liberal IDIOCY of following reports obsession, in contradiction to what is 100% obvious right before their eyes. REAL anecdotal, undeniable EVIDENCE, derived from REAL LIFE, not some biased propagandist.

 

[Jroc]

Then why do magaturds have such a hardon for a 'border wall'? Is it the very least the MAGA party can do to stifle illegal migration, or is this an issue magaturds were conditioned to respond to by the very orange bag 'O shyt they voted for?

Are you 12 years old?... The border is closed and the wall is being built. It'll be completely finished by the time Trump's term is over

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Notice the word "anecdotal" in the quote post.
Liberals have the VERY strange notion that anecdotal information is illegitimate, and only "information" derived from scientific analysis studies are acceptable.

Not only do they think this, but they think the general public HA HA is with them on this.

This is one of the most clear examples of how reality detatched these dupes are.

Oh yeah, libs. Completely disregard all common sense and everything you SEE & HEAR with your own EYES & EARS, no matter how obvious it is, and just rely on what some media reporter, university think tank, etc (of course friendly to them) as to say from all their illustrious and oh so prestigious "studies". Pheeew!!

Although this post should be the end of it, if you want to further the debate, I'll cite a couple more instances of liberal IDIOCY of following reports obsession, in contradiction to what is 100% obvious right before their eyes. REAL anecdotal, undeniable EVIDENCE, derived from REAL LIFE, not some biased propagandist.

'Common sense.' Sure.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Are you 12 years old?... The border is closed and the wall is being built. It'll be completely finished by the time Trump's term is over

What makes a magaturd believe that? Because they were told?

 

[protectionist]

'Border encounters' ≠ Border crossings, you derp. Your sources are biased.

And where did you think he was going to refer to ? The New York Slimes, Washington Compost, Southern Poverty Laughingstock Center ?

 

[protectionist]

'Common sense.' Sure.

Yeah, that's a another thing libs pay little attention to > common sense.
Not much of a response. Try again.

Despite the feeling I get that you are totally programmed into the "scientific" analysis (often hyperbolic BS) scenario, you should know that in many instances clear, anecdotal evidence is 1000 times superior to the wackadoodle reports you think are so cool.

Sorry to knock you off your security ledge, but it's necessary to enter the REAL WORLD at some point in your life.

 

[Jroc]

What makes a magaturd believe that? Because they were told?

Oh you're a kid

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Yeah, that's a another thing libs pay little attention to > common sense.
Not much of a response. Try again.

I don't believe magaturds even have the sense nature gave a common goat.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Oh you're a kid

I'm not. So, no real response?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

And where did you think he was going to refer to ? The New York Slimes, Washington Compost, Southern Poverty Laughingstock Center ?

Of course not. Magaturds hate those sources because it makes their feelz hurt. Snowflakes being snowflakes.

 

[protectionist]

I don't believe magaturds even have the sense nature gave a common goat.

OK. I 'll give you the examples - you asked for it >>

1) A poster, trying to claim that VA hospitals had a balanced racial diversity among employees tossed a study at me, thinking that was all he needed to do.
Sorry fella, I go to a VA hospital frequently, and I SEE who's working there. Doctors, nurses, techs, clerical, etc and they are 95% "people of color" (mostly blacks).
You rely on numbers written by people you haven't seen, don't know their names, and know nothing about them. Instead of ascertaining FROM REAL LIFE.

GO TO A VA HOSPITAL AND SEE.

I got 4 surgeries in the VA hospital in Tampa in 2024 & 2025, and have BEEN THERE DOZENS of times for the past 20 years. I KNOW what I'm talking about. You are just reading.

2) The goofball Stephens-Davidowitz "racism" study : in this "research", published as "undeniable" in the New York Times, it was contended that some places in the US were more racist than other places. The study contended that because 57% of Denver, CO, voted for Obama in 2008, and only 48% of Wheeling WV did, that Wheeling was the 7th most "racist" city in America, while Denver was the 4th most “enlightened” city.

Problems here are twofold. First, in places like the Times, the only 1 dimension at play was Obama's race. The Stephens-Davidowitz study failed to consider that Obama was the most fabulous, celebrity-backed candidate for president in a long time - something more important to people in Denver, than in West Virginia.

Secondly, on Nov. 2, 2008, two days before the election, Obama vowed to bankrupt the coal industry. He threatened to impose huge fines on coal companies for emissions of greenhouse gases. West Virginia's economy is 99% (energy) and 60% (business taxes) dependent on coal. The real way to test Stephens-Davidowitz theory about West Virginians would be to run a non-flashy black candidate who had not pledged to destroy the coal industry, and THEN compare votes.

Here's an alternative to the faulty Stephens-Davidowitz study that the New York Times admired so much >> A conservative writer did a study on states' inclinations to racism, also. In that study, different states were compared by participation in the military - an institution with a high level of close quarter racial mixing, jaw to jaw, in military barracks (hell for racists).

The least racist states were Montana, Texas, Wyoming, Alabama, Alaska, and Idaho. The most racist ones were Massachusetts, New York, Connecticut, and Vermont.

So much for "citations in support of assertions".
So much for smug (& stupid) minimizations of anecdotal evidence.

You're getting an education.

 

[protectionist]

Of course not. Magaturds hate those sources because it makes their feelz hurt. Snowflakes being snowflakes.

And that they print bullshit.