Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At this point you have to be a total greedy idiot or brainwashed functional moron to vote for this guy.... His claim to fame is that he has not ruined the Obama recovery... Yet. He certainly causes enough chaos and anger around the world with his trade Wars and tariffs that it could happen anytime....All he had to do to take over the party was parrot Fox Rush etc etc lies character assassination and hate. what a bunch of idiots and assholes.....You guys watch the fake news. You read fake news. Anything that doesn't match your confirmation bias is called fake news. But you'll watch the impeachment happen and there is nothing you can do about it.
Sure but it will die where reason rules the day.
The bitch is so daffy, that she tells everyone how she smeared Donnie. The dims are so stupid, they don’t care. This is the leader of the dim party. The best they can do?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So the best republicans can do is a pathological liar, crook and con man?
So you’re not voting for him again?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So what is her lie again, dummkopf?The assholes know the truth and keep lying...All he had to do to take over the party was parrot Fox Rush etc etc lies character assassination and hate. what a bunch of idiots and assholes.....Sure but it will die where reason rules the day.
The bitch is so daffy, that she tells everyone how she smeared Donnie. The dims are so stupid, they don’t care. This is the leader of the dim party. The best they can do?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So the best republicans can do is a pathological liar, crook and con man?
Exactly. Nancy is demonstrating it here on camera.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What statements, it’s secret meeting, why do you think the gop rushed the room?witnesses' statements. Can you read?fk dude, I here news reports about damning testimony. how does the news know that if there aren't leaks from the demofks? too fking funny.again, why the leaks then? it isn't confidential at all since no classified material or people are in this.Because, assfuck, there are rules. If you are not on that committee, you don't have access.then why are they holding transcripts from members of the house? That's secret.
got to give us a reason for the leaking and not the transparency leftist say they need.
BTW, we know why, I want you're explanation.
What part of the interviews have any member of the committees leaked. Republican or Democrat?
Witnesses have released statements, but that's not the committee members leaking anything.
I'm guessing February 27-Schiff should have found more evidence in his attic and witnesses hiding in his closet by thenExactly when will that be? I get pretty busy and don't want to miss it.The time has come for Trump.
Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz
Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.
Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”
It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.
There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.
There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.
Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:
“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”
Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment
Trump has a guest coming to visit
And he doesn't worry about invitations
You won't.
What statements, it’s secret meeting, why do you think the gop rushed the room?witnesses' statements. Can you read?fk dude, I here news reports about damning testimony. how does the news know that if there aren't leaks from the demofks? too fking funny.again, why the leaks then? it isn't confidential at all since no classified material or people are in this.Because, assfuck, there are rules. If you are not on that committee, you don't have access.
got to give us a reason for the leaking and not the transparency leftist say they need.
BTW, we know why, I want you're explanation.
What part of the interviews have any member of the committees leaked. Republican or Democrat?
Witnesses have released statements, but that's not the committee members leaking anything.
half of those guys who Rush the room are on the committees so they can be there no problem. almost half of each committee are Republicans, brainwashed functional moron. But your lying scumbag media and political Heroes lie to you all the time. It's so obvious if you change the channel or read a newspaper from anywhere in the world but Rupert Murdoch. Wake up, sleeping beauty. it's crazy -you are a interested GOP voter or whatever not democratic and you don't know that these committees are almost half Republican and they can ask questions and talk to people. Read something Jesus. You used to be the silent majority now you're the loudmouth brainwashed idiot majority about 33% of the country never change the channel.... Poor America.What statements, it’s secret meeting, why do you think the gop rushed the room?witnesses' statements. Can you read?fk dude, I here news reports about damning testimony. how does the news know that if there aren't leaks from the demofks? too fking funny.again, why the leaks then? it isn't confidential at all since no classified material or people are in this.Because, assfuck, there are rules. If you are not on that committee, you don't have access.
got to give us a reason for the leaking and not the transparency leftist say they need.
BTW, we know why, I want you're explanation.
What part of the interviews have any member of the committees leaked. Republican or Democrat?
Witnesses have released statements, but that's not the committee members leaking anything.
Nobody is leaking anything but the witnesses give statements to the press. It's not secret at all dingbat.half of those guys who Rush the room are on the committees so they can be there no problem. almost half of each committee are Republicans, brainwashed functional moron. But your lying scumbag media and political Heroes lie to you all the time. It's so obvious if you change the channel or read a newspaper from anywhere in the world but Rupert Murdoch. Wake up, sleeping beauty. it's crazy -you are a interested GOP voter or whatever not democratic and you don't know that these committees are almost half Republican and they can ask questions and talk to people. Read something Jesus. You used to be the silent majority now you're the loudmouth brainwashed idiot majority about 33% of the country never change the channel.... Poor America.What statements, it’s secret meeting, why do you think the gop rushed the room?witnesses' statements. Can you read?fk dude, I here news reports about damning testimony. how does the news know that if there aren't leaks from the demofks? too fking funny.again, why the leaks then? it isn't confidential at all since no classified material or people are in this.
got to give us a reason for the leaking and not the transparency leftist say they need.
BTW, we know why, I want you're explanation.
What part of the interviews have any member of the committees leaked. Republican or Democrat?
Witnesses have released statements, but that's not the committee members leaking anything.
The whole point of not televising it etc is so the witnesses don't know what each other are saying. It is a federal crime to lie to Congress. S***Nobody is leaking anything but the witnesses give statements to the press. It's not secret at all dingbat.half of those guys who Rush the room are on the committees so they can be there no problem. almost half of each committee are Republicans, brainwashed functional moron. But your lying scumbag media and political Heroes lie to you all the time. It's so obvious if you change the channel or read a newspaper from anywhere in the world but Rupert Murdoch. Wake up, sleeping beauty. it's crazy -you are a interested GOP voter or whatever not democratic and you don't know that these committees are almost half Republican and they can ask questions and talk to people. Read something Jesus. You used to be the silent majority now you're the loudmouth brainwashed idiot majority about 33% of the country never change the channel.... Poor America.What statements, it’s secret meeting, why do you think the gop rushed the room?witnesses' statements. Can you read?fk dude, I here news reports about damning testimony. how does the news know that if there aren't leaks from the demofks? too fking funny.What part of the interviews have any member of the committees leaked. Republican or Democrat?
Witnesses have released statements, but that's not the committee members leaking anything.
The whole point of not televising it etc is so the witnesses don't know what each other are saying. It is a federal crime to lie to Congress. S***Nobody is leaking anything but the witnesses give statements to the press. It's not secret at all dingbat.half of those guys who Rush the room are on the committees so they can be there no problem. almost half of each committee are Republicans, brainwashed functional moron. But your lying scumbag media and political Heroes lie to you all the time. It's so obvious if you change the channel or read a newspaper from anywhere in the world but Rupert Murdoch. Wake up, sleeping beauty. it's crazy -you are a interested GOP voter or whatever not democratic and you don't know that these committees are almost half Republican and they can ask questions and talk to people. Read something Jesus. You used to be the silent majority now you're the loudmouth brainwashed idiot majority about 33% of the country never change the channel.... Poor America.What statements, it’s secret meeting, why do you think the gop rushed the room?witnesses' statements. Can you read?fk dude, I here news reports about damning testimony. how does the news know that if there aren't leaks from the demofks? too fking funny.
The House impeaches and the Senate conducts a trial to determine if the person will be removed from office. As things stand now, Trump will be impeached and the Senate will not remove him from office. However, a lot can change, there are still more witnesses coming forward.The time has come for Trump.
Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz
Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.
Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”
It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.
There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.
There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.
Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:
“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”
Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment
Trump has a guest coming to visit
And he doesn't worry about invitations
I don't think so. The D's still need 67 votes in the US Senate. And none of this changes this fact.
Personally, I don't think the D's even have the votes in the House in spite of their huge majority there.
I will also say this here, the Republicans are through as a party if they don't stick together here and stop the coup. Permanent Minority Status may be what the establishment Republicans like Pierre Delecta want, but I think when it would end of the party. People aren't going to donate or work for a party with no chance of implementing their policies. An impeachment of Donald J. Trump would be a message to millions of Deplorable Americans that they just don't count and they might as well just stay home on election day.
Without being allowed to bring in witnessesWhat statements, it’s secret meeting, why do you think the gop rushed the room?witnesses' statements. Can you read?fk dude, I here news reports about damning testimony. how does the news know that if there aren't leaks from the demofks? too fking funny.again, why the leaks then? it isn't confidential at all since no classified material or people are in this.
got to give us a reason for the leaking and not the transparency leftist say they need.
BTW, we know why, I want you're explanation.
What part of the interviews have any member of the committees leaked. Republican or Democrat?
Witnesses have released statements, but that's not the committee members leaking anything.
The same room that Republicans on the relevant committees were sitting in?
The House impeaches and the Senate conducts a trial to determine if the person will be removed from office. As things stand now, Trump will be impeached and the Senate will not remove him from office. However, a lot can change, there are still more witnesses coming forward.The time has come for Trump.
Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz
Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.
Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”
It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.
There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.
There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.
Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:
“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”
Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment
Trump has a guest coming to visit
And he doesn't worry about invitations
I don't think so. The D's still need 67 votes in the US Senate. And none of this changes this fact.
Personally, I don't think the D's even have the votes in the House in spite of their huge majority there.
I will also say this here, the Republicans are through as a party if they don't stick together here and stop the coup. Permanent Minority Status may be what the establishment Republicans like Pierre Delecta want, but I think when it would end of the party. People aren't going to donate or work for a party with no chance of implementing their policies. An impeachment of Donald J. Trump would be a message to millions of Deplorable Americans that they just don't count and they might as well just stay home on election day.
Without being allowed to bring in witnessesWhat statements, it’s secret meeting, why do you think the gop rushed the room?witnesses' statements. Can you read?fk dude, I here news reports about damning testimony. how does the news know that if there aren't leaks from the demofks? too fking funny.What part of the interviews have any member of the committees leaked. Republican or Democrat?
Witnesses have released statements, but that's not the committee members leaking anything.
The same room that Republicans on the relevant committees were sitting in?
If democrats in the House vote against impeachment, most of them will lose their jobs next November. Support for Trump among democrats is in the single digits.With the successes that Trump is enjoying as president, he can run on his record and win.LolWell it Has to make it through the Senate, and if it does every single one of those Republicans will be primaried out... lolThe time has come for Trump.
Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz
Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.
Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”
It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.
There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.
There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.
Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:
“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”
Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment
Trump has a guest coming to visit
And he doesn't worry about invitations
No. Impeachment is only done by congress. The senate convicts. When the evidence is shown to the American people, if the senate does not convict, they very well may be voted out of the majority.
They Will they have to convince 15 or 20 Republican senators, Who will be primaried out if they convict.
If the facts show the corruption the statements of people like Taylor are expressing and republicans don't vote to convict, they will be voted out. Not everybody who voted for Trump is a ride or die Trump nut job. Some voted for him only because he wasn't Hillary, not because they love Trump.
Why else have the dems looked like deer in the headlights? They got nothing, and they have done nothing.
This is their only hope (in their minds) for a win, and people aren't as stupid as they, and their wingnuts thinking they are.
I agree with you on the Senate vote but when all the evidence from the depositions and investigations are present, the House will vote a bill of impeachment. However, we are very early in the process. The committee is still doing depositions and apparently there is lot more to come.The House impeaches and the Senate conducts a trial to determine if the person will be removed from office. As things stand now, Trump will be impeached and the Senate will not remove him from office. However, a lot can change, there are still more witnesses coming forward.The time has come for Trump.
Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz
Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.
Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”
It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.
There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.
There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.
Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:
“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”
Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment
Trump has a guest coming to visit
And he doesn't worry about invitations
I don't think so. The D's still need 67 votes in the US Senate. And none of this changes this fact.
Personally, I don't think the D's even have the votes in the House in spite of their huge majority there.
I will also say this here, the Republicans are through as a party if they don't stick together here and stop the coup. Permanent Minority Status may be what the establishment Republicans like Pierre Delecta want, but I think when it would end of the party. People aren't going to donate or work for a party with no chance of implementing their policies. An impeachment of Donald J. Trump would be a message to millions of Deplorable Americans that they just don't count and they might as well just stay home on election day.
I disagree. If impeachment came up for a vote this evening, it might well fail.
That's why Ms. Pelosi isn't interested in putting it up for a vote.
But in the Senate, there is no chance whatsoever of a conviction. A Republican voting "aye" would basically be voting to cede the 2020 election. Donald J. Trump is all the party has right now, and to reject his astounding record of successes, they might as well stay home next year.
congratulations, a dupe learns something....congratulations a doop learns something....What statements, it’s secret meeting, why do you think the gop rushed the room?witnesses' statements. Can you read?fk dude, I here news reports about damning testimony. how does the news know that if there aren't leaks from the demofks? too fking funny.What part of the interviews have any member of the committees leaked. Republican or Democrat?
Witnesses have released statements, but that's not the committee members leaking anything.
The same room that Republicans on the relevant committees were sitting in?
Without being allowed to bring in witnesses
I'm sure everyone is standing in line to vote for a socialist/communist.....yes sirIf democrats in the House vote against impeachment, most of them will lose their jobs next November. Support for Trump among democrats is in the single digits.With the successes that Trump is enjoying as president, he can run on his record and win.LolWell it Has to make it through the Senate, and if it does every single one of those Republicans will be primaried out... lol
No. Impeachment is only done by congress. The senate convicts. When the evidence is shown to the American people, if the senate does not convict, they very well may be voted out of the majority.
They Will they have to convince 15 or 20 Republican senators, Who will be primaried out if they convict.
If the facts show the corruption the statements of people like Taylor are expressing and republicans don't vote to convict, they will be voted out. Not everybody who voted for Trump is a ride or die Trump nut job. Some voted for him only because he wasn't Hillary, not because they love Trump.
Why else have the dems looked like deer in the headlights? They got nothing, and they have done nothing.
This is their only hope (in their minds) for a win, and people aren't as stupid as they, and their wingnuts thinking they are.
Personally, I think it's a mistake to impeach Trump. I have no doubt he is guilty and a lot of democrat house member would suffer politically for not impeaching him but to do so would help Trump get elected. I say this because Senate republicans are not going to remove Trump from office. He is their only viable candidate and his campaign chest is stuffed with money. If the Senate fails to convict him, which is almost assured, his impeachment trial in the Senate and his victory may well sail him into office. Trump will claim he has been found innocent of all the bogus charges created by democrats. At Trump rallies you will here Innocent, Innocent, Innocent.
IMHO, democrats in the House should continue to investigation right up to the elections and let the voters determine guilt or innocent.
, we'll show Trump.
You mean he hasn't ruined Obama's recovery yet, super duper? There are no achievements. Just propaganda.The House impeaches and the Senate conducts a trial to determine if the person will be removed from office. As things stand now, Trump will be impeached and the Senate will not remove him from office. However, a lot can change, there are still more witnesses coming forward.The time has come for Trump.
Trump Will Be Impeached
Ambassador William Taylor’s testimony sealed the deal.
October 22, 2019
by John Podhoretz
Remember when I said last week that October 17 was the worst day of the Trump presidency? Well, October 22 and has now come along to break the record. This is the day that, I think, has ensured Donald Trump’s impeachment. Not his removal. But impeachment will be bad enough.
Today’s key sentence: “Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance.”
It comes from the testimony of acting U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine William Taylor before House impeachment investigators, and it instantly makes all but impossible the task of anyone seeking to defend Trump against the charge that he held up American military aid to Ukraine to secure a political advantage in the 2020 election.
There were three defenses of Trump following the revelations of the “whistleblower” and the phone-call transcript of the conversation between the presidents of the United States and Ukraine. The first was that he is only interested in investigating corruption relating to the 2016 election. The second is that even though Trump himself said he wanted the Ukranian to do him a favor, there was no quid pro quo. The third is that the only thing Trump was trading for was a White House visit, which is no great shakes.
There’s no need to talk about the “whistleblower” and his findings any longer, and there’s no need for the whistleblower to be heard any further. We have a veteran U.S. diplomat on the record saying that a Trump intimate told him Trump was holding up Congressionally authorized and appropriated military aid to Ukraine because he wanted a public statement from the Zelensky government that it was investigating Joe Biden’s son.
Taylor said this of a September 1 phone call with Gordon Sondland, our ambassador to the European Union about the $275 million in U.S. security assistance to Ukraine as well as a possible meeting between Trump and Ukranian president Zelensky:
“Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelensky to state publicly that Ukraine will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. Ambassador Sondland also told me that he now recognized that he had made a mistake by earlier telling the Ukrainian officials to whom he spoke that a White House meeting with President Zelenskyy was dependent on a public announcement of investigations—in fact, Ambassador Sondland said, ‘everything’ was dependent on such an announcement, including security assistance. He said that President Trump wanted President Zelenskyy ‘in a public box’ by making a public statement about ordering such investigations.”
Ambassador William Taylor’s Testimony Ensured Trump’s Impeachment
Trump has a guest coming to visit
And he doesn't worry about invitations
I don't think so. The D's still need 67 votes in the US Senate. And none of this changes this fact.
Personally, I don't think the D's even have the votes in the House in spite of their huge majority there.
I will also say this here, the Republicans are through as a party if they don't stick together here and stop the coup. Permanent Minority Status may be what the establishment Republicans like Pierre Delecta want, but I think when it would end of the party. People aren't going to donate or work for a party with no chance of implementing their policies. An impeachment of Donald J. Trump would be a message to millions of Deplorable Americans that they just don't count and they might as well just stay home on election day.
I disagree. If impeachment came up for a vote this evening, it might well fail.
That's why Ms. Pelosi isn't interested in putting it up for a vote.
But in the Senate, there is no chance whatsoever of a conviction. A Republican voting "aye" would basically be voting to cede the 2020 election. Donald J. Trump is all the party has right now, and to reject his astounding record of successes, they might as well stay home next year.
Nope wrong. You haven’t read the right ClintonWithout being allowed to bring in witnessesWhat statements, it’s secret meeting, why do you think the gop rushed the room?witnesses' statements. Can you read?fk dude, I here news reports about damning testimony. how does the news know that if there aren't leaks from the demofks? too fking funny.
The same room that Republicans on the relevant committees were sitting in?
When Clinton was impeached Democrats could only call witnesses near the end. So, not that this has anything to do with Brooks Brothers riot v2 that I was responding to.
