Furious Pelosi Rants on MSNBC, Dismisses Explosive New Video Admitting She’s Responsible for Lack of National Guard on J6!

[jc456]

Sure, Q-NUT.

Taking that Trump U. "law" school correspondence course really shows, you aced the course.

When one has nothing

 

[konradv]

So that’s what you think about rather than following evidence! Interesting cuck habit

What evidence? MAGA’s usually turns out to be not what they say it is or “whistleblowers” mysteriously disappear!

#MAGA=GRIFT

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

So that’s what you think about rather than following evidence! Interesting cuck habit

WTF, Q-NUT?
'Evidence"?
Those are laws, DUMBASS.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

When one has nothing

That's what you got, after taking the correspondence course.

 

[Hollie]

BFD.
Insurrection is harder to prove in court.
Just because a person broke a window , or got caught entering the capitol doesn't mean they were intent on overthrowing the government.
The prosecution would have to prove their intent.

Seditious conspiracy is much easier to prove, in court, of their intent and carries a harsher sentence.
It centers more on incitement and plotting.

Insurrection carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison.
Seditious conspiracy carries a penalty of up to 20 years.

Insurrection: Defined under 18 U.S.C. § 2383, insurrection refers to any act of rising against the authority of the state or its laws. Legally, it's the violent uprising against governmental authority. This includes taking up arms or otherwise actively opposing the government's power and lawful authority.

Insurrection Definition & Meaning​

View attachment 963517
Merriam-Webster
https://www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary › insurr...
5 days ago — The meaning of INSURRECTION is an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government.

Both describe, the ACT, not the intent.


Evidently, you fall into the category of the MAGA supporters.

Taking that Merriam-Webster correspondence course in “lawyer stuff” gives you the ability to cut and paste definitions you don’t understand. Very impressive.

 

[Hollie]

You're FOS.
Posting RW talking points.
Pelosi points out the facts.

Unaired footage shows chaos, anger of congressional ...​

View attachment 963181
Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2024/06/09 › chaos-...
7 days ago — POLITICO reviewed the 45 minutes of video, shot by Nancy Pelosi's daughter Alexandra, that was recently obtained by House GOP investigators.

Pelosi herself appeared frustrated after she left the Capitol, questioning why Capitol security hadn’t seemed to adequately plan for the large-scale protest to turn violent, according to the video. Pelosi also suggested that Capitol security officials should have been more transparent with lawmakers about what they were hearing. She noted that the main guidance they gave to members was to use the underground tunnels from the office buildings to access the Capitol, rather than walking outside.

McCullough begins to tell Pelosi that Capitol security officials believed they were adequately prepared — which aligns with testimony other Pelosi staffers gave to the Jan. 6 committee — but the then-speaker cut her off, adding that leaders have a “responsibility” and “we didn’t have any accountability for what was going on there and we should have.”

“What is missing here in terms of anticipation?” Pelosi asked, referring to the security planning. “They thought these people would act civilized? They thought these people gave a damn?”


The Trump cult wants to blame firefighters, instead of the arsonist..........

Their dear leader.

Your dear leader admitted her dereliction of duty.

 

[Hollie]

Really?
So, the Trump cult can spot a "Socialist/Communist" from a mile away, according to them.
But got taken by one?
The guy never even had a Facebook account.
Teabaggers rallied around and took direction from a random 'socialist"?

They're dumber than previously noted.

WHY would Pelosi be responsible for the security at the Ellipse?
A Trump sponsored event.

Pelosi has answered that question in acknowledgement of her defeliction of duty.

 

[Hollie]

What evidence? MAGA’s usually turns out to be not what they say it is or “whistleblowers” mysteriously disappear!

#MAGA=GRIFT

It’s comedy gold when leftists try to lecture anyone on “whistleblowers.” Refer to your hero Adam Schiff and the leftist “Russia Collusion Hoax.

 

[ColonelAngus]

They cant identify who left the pipe bomb near the DNC HQ…but they sure as **** got everyone else.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Taking that Merriam-Webster correspondence course in “lawyer stuff” gives you the ability to cut and paste definitions you don’t understand. Very impressive.

Insurrection: Defined under 18 U.S.C. § 2383, insurrection refers to any act of rising against the authority of the state or its laws. Legally, it's the violent uprising against governmental authority. This includes taking up arms or otherwise actively opposing the government's power and lawful authority.

The US code was for normal people.

The Merriam- Webster definition was for the Trump cult.
I guess I gave them too much credit.
They can't even decipher the easy stuff.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Your dear leader admitted her dereliction of duty.

See above, you can't comprehend words.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Pelosi has answered that question in acknowledgement of her defeliction of duty.

You cant spell words either.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

It’s comedy gold when leftists try to lecture anyone on “whistleblowers.” Refer to your hero Adam Schiff and the leftist “Russia Collusion Hoax.

A now-indicted FBI informant was at the 'heart' of the GOP's ...​

NBC News
https://www.nbcnews.com › politics › joe-biden › now-...
Feb 16, 2024 — ... whistleblowers that there was interference into their investigation ... “Was it obstruction when Joe Biden said all the things he has said that ...

 

[jc456]

That's what you got, after taking the correspondence course.

I got this

 

[jc456]

WTF, Q-NUT?
'Evidence"?
Those are laws, DUMBASS.

what are laws in this conversation? or should I say your blatant deflection

 

[jc456]

what are laws in this conversation? or should I say your blatant deflection

Smokin' OP , so I see you don't know the OP is about the ploy of peloser. nothing about law.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

what are laws in this conversation? or should I say your blatant deflection

Post 288 Q-NUT.............

Seditious conspiracy overlaps insurrection and is much broader in the scope of prosecution.

"Only in a demofks wet dream. You must have many".

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Smokin' OP , so I see you don't know the OP is about the ploy of peloser. nothing about law.

No ploy Q-NUT.
Just a Trump humpers fantasy.
Looking to blame anyone or anything but your dear leader and his cult.

 

[jc456]

No ploy Q-NUT.
Just a Trump humpers fantasy.
Looking to blame anyone or anything but your dear leader and his cult.

So, did she admit she fked up for you?

 

[jc456]

Post 288 Q-NUT.............


"Only in a demofks wet dream. You must have many".

what law? you still haven't stated it. Your beef ain't with me. I don't bring charges.