Trump will announce end of birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, officials say

[JoeB131]

Dude, the Chinese Exclusion act made immigration from China illegal. In 1882. Is that a "relatively new concept" in your world?

The Chinese Exclusion Act prevented people from coming here from China, it didn't make being here from China illegal, that was the point.

At the same time, people could freely travel up here from Latin America, and there were very few limits from Europe.

We see you stamping your feet as you chant this.,

Actually, the Courts are going to define it that way. Did you see how badly Trump got slapped down by a Reagan appointee?

 

[Rawley]

The Chinese Exclusion Act prevented people from coming here from China, it didn't make being here from China illegal, that was the point.

LOL. So if they snuck in, in violation of the law they would be welcomed with opened arms, huh?

At the same time, people could freely travel up here from Latin America, and there were very few limits from Europe.



Actually, the Courts are going to define it that way. Did you see how badly Trump got slapped down by a Reagan appointee?

Did you expect him to deny the TRO?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Dude, the Chinese Exclusion act made immigration from China illegal. In 1882. Is that a "relatively new concept" in your world?

It had nothing to do with birthright (the exclusion act). Wong decided birthright citizenship 127 years ago.

 

[martybegan]

The parents will determine if they stay and how, not the gubmint.

They don't get to decide that. They came here illegally, they pay the price.

 

[martybegan]

Exactly... all of which was meaningless because the 14th is clearly defined.

You are born here, you are a citizen. Period.

except for that pesky under the jurisdiction thereof part.

when the question was last asked in 1898 immigration laws were limited.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

They don't get to decide that. They came here illegally, they pay the price.

Not when it comes to children citizens. If the parents have citizen households available for the children, they will stay. You have no EO or court ruling or legislation that says to the alternative.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

except for that pesky under the jurisdiction thereof part.

when the question was last asked in 1898 immigration laws were limited.

Your interpretation has no meaning in law, at all. Or you can show it.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

They don't get to decide that. They came here illegally, they pay the price.

Of course they do.

 

[martybegan]

Not when it comes to children citizens. If the parents have citizen households available for the children, they will stay. You have no EO or court ruling or legislation that says to the alternative.

If the parents want to take them with them, they can. Being a citizen doesn't override parental rights.

What they cant say is "let us stay because our anchor baby lets us"

 

[martybegan]

Your interpretation has no meaning in law, at all. Or you can show it.

Once it gets to the SC, it will have it, one way or the other.

 

[martybegan]

Of course they do.

They get to leave the kids here or take them with them. They don't get to stay because their kid is a citizen.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

If the parents want to take them with them, they can. Being a citizen doesn't override parental rights.

What they cant say is "let us stay because our anchor baby lets us"

You are wrong and can't prove differently.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Once it gets to the SC, it will have it, one way or the other.

That's true, and SCOTUS I think will up hold Ark.

 

[martybegan]

You are wrong and can't prove differently.

This is how Trump is going to approach it.

So sorry you lost the election.

 

[martybegan]

That's true, and SCOTUS I think will up hold Ark.

What a mouth breather like you thinks is as valid as a Brisket recipe from PETA.

\

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

This is how Trump is going to approach it.

So sorry you lost the election.

Does not matter to the courts. He will lose, and America will gain.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

What a mouth breather like you thinks is as valid as a Brisket recipe from PETA.

\

More so than you. )

 

[martybegan]

Does not matter to the courts. He will lose, and America will gain.

America doesn't gain from unfettered and uncontrolled immigration. That he was elected proves the people here believe that.

 

[martybegan]

More so than you. )

You are a useless hack. nothing you post has any import or gravitas.

 

[Lisa558]

Not when it comes to children citizens. If the parents have citizen households available for the children, they will stay. You have no EO or court ruling or legislation that says to the alternative.

No, if the parents broke the law and are here illegally, they get deported. It will be their choice whether to take any anchor babies with them or leave them here, under foster care.