Trump Warns Iran "The Big One is Coming" as More Stealth Bombers Deploy

[CrusaderFrank]

Israel should definitely have input considering the prior Regime’s stated goal was to eliminate the Jewish country. It makes sense that the same Jewish country would have interest in making sure another Jew-hating Islamic terrorist isn’t put in charge of Iran,

Yeah

Biggest terrorist regime in the world should pick Irans next leader

The terrorist State liquidating Gaza should get a say

Sure

 

[Lisa558]

Yeah

Biggest terrorist regime in the world should pick Irans next leader

The terrorist State liquidating Gaza should get a say

Sure

Each post reveals more antisemitism than the previous one.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Each post reveals more antisemitism than the previous one.

Zionism =/= Judaism

 

[JGalt]

So you still don't understand MAD, do you?

Russia and China would grump about it and so would the left. But I doubt any of them would actually do anything about it. They all think Trump's crazy. And like I said, "I don't think Trump would go that far."

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Russia and China would grump about it and so would the left. But I doubt any of them would actually do anything about it. They all think Trump's crazy. And like I said, "I don't think Trump would go that far."

Like I said, you know nothing about MAD. Maybe you should look it up.

 

[JGalt]

Like I said, you know nothing about MAD. Maybe you should look it up.

Sure thing....

"It is highly unlikely that Russia or China would initiate a full-scale nuclear strike (MAD) on the U.S. solely because the U.S. nuked Iran. While they are strategic partners with Iran and would likely respond with severe economic, conventional, or diplomatic retaliation, MAD implies a direct attack on the mainland, which would result in their own destruction
.
Key Considerations:

• Strategic Partners: Russia and China have deep military and economic ties to Iran, making a U.S. attack a major provocation.
• Risk of Escalation: While they would likely not trigger full MAD, the risk of miscalculation, conventional war, or limited nuclear exchange would be unprecedentedly high.
• MAD Doctrine: The doctrine relies on direct retaliation against the attacker; neither Russia nor China would typically risk total annihilation for a non-treaty ally like Iran unless they deemed their own survival directly threatened.

The primary response would likely be massive, combined international condemnation and economic warfare rather than immediate nuclear suicide."

Are you happy now?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Sure thing....

"It is highly unlikely that Russia or China would initiate a full-scale nuclear strike (MAD) on the U.S. solely because the U.S. nuked Iran. While they are strategic partners with Iran and would likely respond with severe economic, conventional, or diplomatic retaliation, MAD implies a direct attack on the mainland, which would result in their own destruction
.
Key Considerations:

• Strategic Partners: Russia and China have deep military and economic ties to Iran, making a U.S. attack a major provocation.
• Risk of Escalation: While they would likely not trigger full MAD, the risk of miscalculation, conventional war, or limited nuclear exchange would be unprecedentedly high.
• MAD Doctrine: The doctrine relies on direct retaliation against the attacker; neither Russia nor China would typically risk total annihilation for a non-treaty ally like Iran unless they deemed their own survival directly threatened.

The primary response would likely be massive, combined international condemnation and economic warfare rather than immediate nuclear suicide."

Are you happy now?

No because you didn't come up with. AI did.

 

[JGalt]

No because you didn't come up with. AI did.

Of course, silly. That explains the quotation marks. Did you think I was going to drive 12 miles to the public library, only to find it closed this time of the evening?

I don't even know if my 20 year old library card is still valid.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Of course, silly. That explains the quotation marks. Did you think I was going to drive 12 miles to the public library, only to find it closed this time of the evening?

I don't even know if my 20 year old library card is still valid.

AI gives you the answer for a question and does not allow you to make the decision for yourself after reading the references. You earned nothing in the process. I could ask you tomorrow the same question and you'd have to use AI again. That is why I think AI will create a new class of morons who are not functional at learning.

 

[Captain Creeper]

So, you don't mind killing innocent Iranians either? You don't mind Russia and China responding in kind?

Is there some virus that you people have contracted to make you lose all perspective?

You are assuming people will die. It is highly doubtful, however, if the device is detonated high enough.

Jesus, you really don’t know shit about these weapons.

 

[Captain Creeper]

AI gives you the answer for a question and does not allow you to make the decision for yourself after reading the references. You earned nothing in the process. I could ask you tomorrow the same question and you'd have to use AI again. That is why I think AI will create a new class of morons who are not functional at learning.

Well, we can agree on that.

 

[Leo123]

No no no, he didn't mean nukes. He means an escalation in the bombing to inflict massive casualties on the IRGC to break their back.

More bunker busters too maybe.

 

[Captain Creeper]

Like I said, you know nothing about MAD. Maybe you should look it up.

Using a high altitude blast over Iran is not within the parameters of the doctrine of mutually assured destruction. Who would retaliate? Russia and China would not retaliate BECAUSE IT WOULD NOT BE AN ATTACK ON THEM.

You should use AI on this topic, as it would make you sound more intelligent.

 

[skye]

What does it mean?


The threat of nuclear strikes?

Trump Warns Iran "The Big One is Coming"​

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump dropping a nuke may finally be the one thing that shakes the GOP Senators out of their apathetic trance, so that he can be tossed out of office.

 

[JGalt]

AI gives you the answer for a question and does not allow you to make the decision for yourself after reading the references. You earned nothing in the process. I could ask you tomorrow the same question and you'd have to use AI again. That is why I think AI will create a new class of morons who are not functional at learning.

Grok, create an image of a grumpy old male school teacher holding a giant ruler and a book, and wearing a graduation cap...

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You are assuming people will die. It is highly doubtful, however, if the device is detonated high enough.

Jesus, you really don’t know shit about these weapons.

If you use it for EMP, people all over the world will die in the ensuing Armageddon. If there is no nuclear holocaust, how many Iranians will die from simply lack of power, assuming your EMP goes as planned? That is why an EMP attack is considered a nuclear attack. regardless of the intent and employment.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Grok, create an image of a grumpy old male school teacher holding a giant ruler and a book, and wearing a graduation cap...

View attachment 1227883

Where did you get my last school yearbook picture from?

 

[JGalt]

If you use it for EMP, people all over the world will die in the ensuing Armageddon. If there is no nuclear holocaust, how many Iranians will die from simply lack of power, assuming your EMP goes as planned? That is why an EMP attack is considered a nuclear attack. regardless of the intent and employment.

I wasn't suggesting the use of large nuclear weapons to create an EMP. We have many smaller ones more suitable for that purpose, ones that could be used over isolated areas with low civilian population.

"The smallest nuclear weapons currently in the US arsenal (as of early 2026, based on the latest estimates from sources like the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) and the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists) are low-yield variants of the B61 gravity bomb family, particularly the B61-3, B61-4, and the newer B61-12.

These are tactical (non-strategic) nuclear weapons, deliverable by aircraft such as F-15, F-16, F-35, and B-2 bombers. They feature variable ("dial-a-yield") designs, allowing operators to select different explosive yields depending on the mission.

• The lowest selectable yield for these B61 variants is approximately 0.3 kilotons(300 tons of TNT equivalent).
  • This is the minimum setting on the B61-3 (up to 170 kt max), B61-4 (up to 50 kt max), and B61-12 (up to 50 kt max, with options including 0.3 kt, 1.5 kt, 10 kt, and 50 kt).
  • 0.3 kt is roughly 2% of the yield of the Hiroshima bomb (~15 kt) and is often described as the unboosted fission primary yield.

For comparison:

• The US also deploys a small number of W76-2 low-yield warheads on Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). These are estimated at around 8 kt (some earlier reports cited ~5 kt, but recent FAS/Bulletin updates use 8 kt). Production was limited (likely ~25 warheads), and they are deployed on only 1–2 missiles per submarine for specific scenarios. This is higher than the B61's minimum.
• Older historical US weapons (e.g., retired W54 or W48) had even smaller yields (down to 0.01–0.072 kt), but none remain in the active arsenal.

The US stockpile includes about 200 non-strategic B61 bombs (with ~100 forward-deployed in Europe for NATO). The B61-12 has been entering service to consolidate older variants, maintaining or improving low-yield options while adding precision guidance.

Yields are estimates from declassified info and expert analyses (e.g., FAS Nuclear Notebook 2025), as exact figures remain classified. No US nuclear weapons are smaller than ~0.3 kt in the current operational inventory."

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I wasn't suggesting the use of large nuclear weapons to create an EMP. We have many smaller ones more suitable for that purpose...

"The smallest nuclear weapons currently in the US arsenal (as of early 2026, based on the latest estimates from sources like the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) and the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists) are low-yield variants of the B61 gravity bomb family, particularly the B61-3, B61-4, and the newer B61-12.

These are tactical (non-strategic) nuclear weapons, deliverable by aircraft such as F-15, F-16, F-35, and B-2 bombers. They feature variable ("dial-a-yield") designs, allowing operators to select different explosive yields depending on the mission.

• The lowest selectable yield for these B61 variants is approximately 0.3 kilotons(300 tons of TNT equivalent).
  • This is the minimum setting on the B61-3 (up to 170 kt max), B61-4 (up to 50 kt max), and B61-12 (up to 50 kt max, with options including 0.3 kt, 1.5 kt, 10 kt, and 50 kt).
  • 0.3 kt is roughly 2% of the yield of the Hiroshima bomb (~15 kt) and is often described as the unboosted fission primary yield.

For comparison:

• The US also deploys a small number of W76-2 low-yield warheads on Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs). These are estimated at around 8 kt (some earlier reports cited ~5 kt, but recent FAS/Bulletin updates use 8 kt). Production was limited (likely ~25 warheads), and they are deployed on only 1–2 missiles per submarine for specific scenarios. This is higher than the B61's minimum.
• Older historical US weapons (e.g., retired W54 or W48) had even smaller yields (down to 0.01–0.072 kt), but none remain in the active arsenal.

The US stockpile includes about 200 non-strategic B61 bombs (with ~100 forward-deployed in Europe for NATO). The B61-12 has been entering service to consolidate older variants, maintaining or improving low-yield options while adding precision guidance.

Yields are estimates from declassified info and expert analyses (e.g., FAS Nuclear Notebook 2025), as exact figures remain classified. No US nuclear weapons are smaller than ~0.3 kt in the current operational inventory."

There you go with that AI bullshit again. EMP weapons are dependent on altitude and nuclear yield. Do you want to take out a town, city, state, country or most of a continent?

How will you deliver the bombs you discussed, as aircraft cannot get high enough to produce an EMP over a wide area? You have to launch an ICBM or SLBM to attain the altitude. What happens when Russia and China detect your launch and retaliate immediately before you can zap IRAN or whomever.

Your entire scenario is an exercise in futility as you could never pull it off with out starting WWIII.