Trump Warns Iran "The Big One is Coming" as More Stealth Bombers Deploy

I am not arguing that point as I have never addressed that portion of your delusions of using a nuclear weapon. I also did not sweep the floor around the silo. I was the one officer aboard my ship that could in fact actually launch a nuclear weapon of either type. I was also only one of 4 people allowed to be a courier for and handle the weapons for loading and offloading. Now, what were your bona fides in that regard, or are your Goggle skills just advanced?
So they taught you how to press a button? 🙄
 
Trump thinks he (Bibi) will get to pick who runs Iran
Israel should definitely have input considering the prior Regime’s stated goal was to eliminate the Jewish country. It makes sense that the same Jewish country would have interest in making sure another Jew-hating Islamic terrorist isn’t put in charge of Iran,
 
There are no grunts in the Navy. Army and Marines? Yes.

So, you have read about things but never actually done anything.
Like I have, I have no experience as a button pusher. I used to play Simon as a child. Perhaps that would make my prowess as a button push far surpass yours. Free Simon
 
15th post

More stealth bombers, which can carry nukes, are deploying. Trump speaks of "the BIG ONE". Trump demand unconditional surrender, which was last obtained by us about nuking Japan. Read the tea leaves. While not conclusive, of course, these may be signs that we are going to use nukes in Iran to compel a swift unconditional surrender from the fiends.

Would I place money on this? Probably not, at this time. However, Trump is a transformer. He is the new merchant of Hope and Change. Perhaps we should consider the positive aspects of nuking Iran. Here are a few.

1. It shows Russia that we are serious about using nuclear weapons and, therefore, they can stop throwing around nuclear threats when he has been too p*ssy to use them to date in any context. We used them in WWII, and we will do it again. Using then in Iran will solidify this and have Russia, and China, curled up in the fetal position embracing each other. The USA is THE NUCLEAR WARFARE GOD.

2. It will bring a quick end to the Iran war, with us as the victors. It will probably save lives on both sides.

3. Nukes can be safely deployed. Everyone is so scared of nuclear weapons. Its like how people are too scared to carry a Glock with a round chambered because there is no exterior safety. In reality, Glocks DO have safeties, and as long as you carry it right, you can carry with a round chambered as safely as you can any other firearm. The nuke default reaction of fear is programmed. Therefore, it can be unprogrammed. Just because we set off some nukes on Iran does not mean it has to be some sort of holocaust involving mass casualties. First, we can use tactical nukes quite effectively to hasten victory. Also, we can effect some high altitude air bursts to shock and awe the fiends while also creating an EMP that will disable everything electric they have. Can you imagine the effect this will have on those people?!? They will beg to surrender unconditionally. Plus, the high altitude bursts substantially reduce the fallout risk. Essentially, we blast a mega tonnage warhead over Tehran a few miles up, and thereby create a second sun in the sky that is far brighter than then one we have naturally. Then everything goes black (we will of course move to prevent any harm/disruption to our electronics due to the EMP. We are not even stationed near the Iranian border. We can select the proper size warhead to keep the EMP limited to a particular area).

4. Building on point no. 1, the use of nukes will cement us as the one true superpower in the world, which is worth trillions in shoring up our national security. As an aside, when everyone sees how was can deploy nuclear weapons in a relatively safe manner, I think we will experience a huge surge in interest in building nuclear reactors for civilian energy. That would be a definite win. We would enhance our energy capabilities, and the leftist twerps will be happy and reduced carb and stuff.

Hell, I am all-in for using nuclear weapons on Iran. It will be spectacular! I see only positive results in do so. Again, we do not have to use them in the same way we did in WWII. Times have changed and technology now affords us many, many options that did not exist at that time. In fact, we do not want to turn Iran into a glass parking lot. There are too many resources there (e.g., oil) that we can exploit to our own advantage). It would be against OUR national interest to do that. But that does not mean that we cannot strategically use nukes, even the big ones, to effect our will on the region.

Probably a good time to test the theory that high-altitude nuclear air bursts cause EMP. Knock out every piece of electronic equipment they have.
 
Probably a good time to test the theory that high-altitude nuclear air bursts cause EMP. Knock out every piece of electronic equipment they have.
So, you don't mind killing innocent Iranians either? You don't mind Russia and China responding in kind?

Is there some virus that you people have contracted to make you lose all perspective?
 
So, you don't mind killing innocent Iranians either? You don't mind Russia and China responding in kind?

Is there some virus that you people have contracted to make you lose all perspective?

I was going to add "Although I don't think Trump would go that far." I will also add this:

"AI Overview

High-altitude nuclear airbursts (HEMP) designed to create electromagnetic pulses
generally do not cause significant local radioactive fallout on the ground. Because the explosion occurs at very high altitudes—often 30km to 400km (18 to 250+ miles)—the fireball does not touch the ground, preventing the suction of dirt and debris that creates heavy, localized fallout.
  • Minimal Local Fallout: The radioactive debris from a high-altitude burst is released into the upper atmosphere, causing little to no immediate danger from fallout to people on the ground.
  • Global Circulation: While local fallout is minimal, the radioactive material is injected into the stratosphere and can circulate around the world for years, slowly settling as worldwide fallout.
  • Radiation Effects: Instead of fallout, the primary hazards are the immediate EMP (damaging electronics) and, depending on altitude, temporary trapped electron radiation that can affect satellites.
In contrast, low-altitude or ground-level nuclear explosions create significant, dangerous local fallout."
 
I was going to add "Although I don't think Trump would go that far." I will also add this:

"AI Overview

High-altitude nuclear airbursts (HEMP) designed to create electromagnetic pulses
generally do not cause significant local radioactive fallout on the ground. Because the explosion occurs at very high altitudes—often 30km to 400km (18 to 250+ miles)—the fireball does not touch the ground, preventing the suction of dirt and debris that creates heavy, localized fallout.
  • Minimal Local Fallout: The radioactive debris from a high-altitude burst is released into the upper atmosphere, causing little to no immediate danger from fallout to people on the ground.
  • Global Circulation: While local fallout is minimal, the radioactive material is injected into the stratosphere and can circulate around the world for years, slowly settling as worldwide fallout.
  • Radiation Effects: Instead of fallout, the primary hazards are the immediate EMP (damaging electronics) and, depending on altitude, temporary trapped electron radiation that can affect satellites.
In contrast, low-altitude or ground-level nuclear explosions create significant, dangerous local fallout."
So you still don't understand MAD, do you?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom