Trump Warns Iran "The Big One is Coming" as More Stealth Bombers Deploy

[Zincwarrior]

He may deploy the MOAB
The GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB), nicknamed the "Mother of All Bombs," is the largest non-nuclear, GPS-guided conventional bomb in the U.S. arsenal. Weighing 21,600 lbs and containing 18,700 lbs of explosive, it is designed for devastating, wide-area destruction of tunnels, caves, and bunkers, typically deployed via C-130 transport aircraft.

Indeed. Iran has boasted of multiple large underground facilities for their Shaheds. Both Israel and the US said they would start targeting them now in their Phase II. Probably try to hit the nuke storage again as well.

 

[Blaster]

Trump is insane and needs to be immediately removed from office

Haha

 

[ThisIsMe]

Kristi Noem Out: Trump Picks Sen. Markwayne Mullin as Replacement

President Donald Trump will nominate Sen. Markwayne Mullin to replace Kristi Noem as chief of the Department of Homeland Security.

www.breitbart.com

More stealth bombers, which can carry nukes, are deploying. Trump speaks of "the BIG ONE". Trump demand unconditional surrender, which was last obtained by us about nuking Japan. Read the tea leaves. While not conclusive, of course, these may be signs that we are going to use nukes in Iran to compel a swift unconditional surrender from the fiends.

Would I place money on this? Probably not, at this time. However, Trump is a transformer. He is the new merchant of Hope and Change. Perhaps we should consider the positive aspects of nuking Iran. Here are a few.

1. It shows Russia that we are serious about using nuclear weapons and, therefore, they can stop throwing around nuclear threats when he has been too p*ssy to use them to date in any context. We used them in WWII, and we will do it again. Using then in Iran will solidify this and have Russia, and China, curled up in the fetal position embracing each other. The USA is THE NUCLEAR WARFARE GOD.

2. It will bring a quick end to the Iran war, with us as the victors. It will probably save lives on both sides.

3. Nukes can be safely deployed. Everyone is so scared of nuclear weapons. Its like how people are too scared to carry a Glock with a round chambered because there is no exterior safety. In reality, Glocks DO have safeties, and as long as you carry it right, you can carry with a round chambered as safely as you can any other firearm. The nuke default reaction of fear is programmed. Therefore, it can be unprogrammed. Just because we set off some nukes on Iran does not mean it has to be some sort of holocaust involving mass casualties. First, we can use tactical nukes quite effectively to hasten victory. Also, we can effect some high altitude air bursts to shock and awe the fiends while also creating an EMP that will disable everything electric they have. Can you imagine the effect this will have on those people?!? They will beg to surrender unconditionally. Plus, the high altitude bursts substantially reduce the fallout risk. Essentially, we blast a mega tonnage warhead over Tehran a few miles up, and thereby create a second sun in the sky that is far brighter than then one we have naturally. Then everything goes black (we will of course move to prevent any harm/disruption to our electronics due to the EMP. We are not even stationed near the Iranian border. We can select the proper size warhead to keep the EMP limited to a particular area).

4. Building on point no. 1, the use of nukes will cement us as the one true superpower in the world, which is worth trillions in shoring up our national security. As an aside, when everyone sees how was can deploy nuclear weapons in a relatively safe manner, I think we will experience a huge surge in interest in building nuclear reactors for civilian energy. That would be a definite win. We would enhance our energy capabilities, and the leftist twerps will be happy and reduced carb and stuff.

Hell, I am all-in for using nuclear weapons on Iran. It will be spectacular! I see only positive results in do so. Again, we do not have to use them in the same way we did in WWII. Times have changed and technology now affords us many, many options that did not exist at that time. In fact, we do not want to turn Iran into a glass parking lot. There are too many resources there (e.g., oil) that we can exploit to our own advantage). It would be against OUR national interest to do that. But that does not mean that we cannot strategically use nukes, even the big ones, to effect our will on the region.

Or it could be another one of those MOABs we used awhile back.


I doubt trump would drop a nuke. We can destroy their regime by other means

 

[Hafar1014]

Did he? Or did Israel hit the school?

Iranian rocket failure hit the school

 

[Lisa558]

Iranian rocket failure hit the school

But, but, but…..it’s the Jews’ fault!!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Or it could be another one of those MOABs we used awhile back.


I doubt trump would drop a nuke. We can destroy their regime by other means

MOABs are dropped by cargo aircraft. They are too big for bombers.

Damned straight!

 

[Captain Creeper]

You are looney tunes if you think we are going to nuke anyone! Go check in to the nearest funny farm before you hurt yourself!

I stated in my op that I did not think we would actually use nuclear weapons. You either did not read it, and just started ignorantly spouting off, OR you are like closeted leftist who argues based on emotion. The point of my post is to explore the positives of using nuclear devices in the Iran conflict, of which there are many.

 

[Captain Creeper]

How many innocent Iranians are you killing?

Please STFU!

Not many if you detonate the device way up there in the atmosphere.

How can you claim to know anything about nuclear weapons?!? You are acting like a big dummy.

 

[Captain Creeper]

No, I was nuclear weapons officer in the Navy and I served on nuclear fleet ballistic missile submarine. What do you have in terms of experience?

You know what you can do with your tampon Tim!

Obviously, it did not make you an expert. I studied nuclear physics and political science in college. I did not do the hard stuff, like dusting control modules and jacking off in my rack, you goofball.

 

[Captain Creeper]

It will spread much worse in the United States after Russia and China blow us off the face of the earth forcing us to do the same to them. You have never heard of MAD?

What kind of ******* show of force are you trying to make? The Iranians know we have nukes and used them in WWII.

Have you flipped your wig?

You are so ******* ignorant on this topic. It amazes me that you are still here.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I stated in my op that I did not think we would actually use nuclear weapons. You either did not read it, and just started ignorantly spouting off, OR you are like closeted leftist who argues based on emotion. The point of my post is to explore the positives of using nuclear devices in the Iran conflict, of which there are many.

What part of idiotic are you not getting? There are zero positives of ever even considering using a nuclear weapon. To think there are, is quite insane.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

You are so ******* ignorant on this topic. It amazes me that you are still here.

What specific nuclear weapons have YOU personally worked with?

 

[Captain Creeper]

What part of idiotic are you not getting? There are zero positives of ever even considering using a nuclear weapon. To think there are, is quite insane.

Can you not read?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Can you not read?

Yes, quite well, and I recognize bullshit when I see it. You are full of it!

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Trump is insane and needs to be immediately removed from office

Minus one times minus one equals plus one.

Crazy person calling Trump crazy equals........

 

[Captain Creeper]

What specific nuclear weapons have YOU personally worked with?

The implication is that YOU "worked with" some particular nuclear weapons. Well, let me tell you something, just because you sweep the floor around a silo does not make you an expert or otherwise denigrate the authority upon which I speak. That is ludicrous, and I should not even have to say this. But, you know, some people are easily influenced ....yada, yada ...

Here are a couple more tidbits for you to ignore. If you blast one 10-15 miles up in the atmosphere, the radiation has very little particulate to attached to. It is not like radiation, of any kind, is a material thing that will fall down to earth. Particulate subject to gravity is required for their to be fallout. Second, whatever particulate is irradiated and falls to earth, it will be diluted by the air and other particulate, gasses, and moisture it encounters on its quite slow descent of 10-15 miles.

I am not talking about a ground burst, which produces the worst fallout. I am not talking about a typical 1-2 mile high air burst. I am talking about a high altitude burst.

Chew on that, Linda, and please keep the ignorance flowing.

 

[Captain Creeper]

Yes, quite well, and I recognize bullshit when I see it. You are full of it!

I don't think so. I think you have a caregiver named LaShawnDriKea reading it to you.

 

[BackAgain]

Not necessarily. You should read my entire post. We can deploy nukes in a relatively safe manner.

I don’t believe that whatsoever.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The implication is that YOU "worked with" some particular nuclear weapons. Well, let me tell you something, just because you sweep the floor around a silo does not make you an expert or otherwise denigrate the authority upon which I speak. That is ludicrous, and I should not even have to say this. But, you know, some people are easily influenced ....yada, yada ...

Here are a couple more tidbits for you to ignore. If you blast one 10-15 miles up in the atmosphere, the radiation has very little particulate to attached to. It is not like radiation, of any kind, is a material thing that will fall down to earth. Particulate subject to gravity is required for their to be fallout. Second, whatever particulate is irradiated and falls to earth, it will be diluted by the air and other particulate, gasses, and moisture it encounters on its quite slow descent of 10-15 miles.

I am not talking about a ground burst, which produces the worst fallout. I am not talking about a typical 1-2 mile high air burst. I am talking about a high altitude burst.

Chew on that, Linda, and please keep the ignorance flowing.

I am not arguing that point as I have never addressed that portion of your delusions of using a nuclear weapon. I also did not sweep the floor around the silo. I was the one officer aboard my ship that could in fact actually launch a nuclear weapon of either type. I was also only one of 4 people allowed to be a courier for and handle the weapons for loading and offloading. Now, what were your bona fides in that regard, or are your Goggle skills just advanced?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I don't think so. I think you have a caregiver named LaShawnDriKea reading it to you.

******* ridiculous. You are a massive ******* troll!