TimFitz
Platinum Member
- Oct 31, 2024
- 9,379
- 5,358
- 938
The evidence that Adam Shifty needed a pardon for crimes against the United States
Schiff never asked for or needed a pardon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The evidence that Adam Shifty needed a pardon for crimes against the United States
The $230 million is the amount in his claims.
This is from the article:
Asked about the issue at the White House after this article published, the president said, “I was damaged very greatly and any money I would get, I would give to charity.”
He added, “I’m the one that makes the decision and that decision would have to go across my desk and it’s awfully strange to make a decision where I’m paying myself.”
So he says the lawsuits are amazing and that he’s the one who decides about whether he wins the lawsuits (which aren’t technically lawsuits but not that important).
He certainly accepted oneSchiff never asked for or needed a pardon.
Problems here.
One, "seeing how it goes" would require transparency that we don't get from this administration. If asked by press, they can just lie or reply with "your mom". If anyone is asked under oath, they can just refuse to say anything.
Second, it's pretty outlandish to think we'd see an independent counsel. For starters, he believes they're unconstitutional but also we haven't seen any independent counsels to prosecute any of his current political opponents.
Third, the federal cases against him only went away because he became president, not because they were found lacking in factual basis. It's pretty absurd to believe you're entitled to millions of dollars because the FBI had to execute a search warrant to recover highly classified documents hidden in your basement.
I don’t know what to tell you. I directly copied it from the article. It’s the 6th paragraph. If you can’t find it, that’s not my fault.I read the article and then went back and did a word search and that phrase nor key words in that phrase were not in the article in the OP.
Ok
I read the article and then went back and did a word search and that phrase nor key words in that phrase were not in the article in the OP.
The article did not say that. The article DID quote a critic saying thats what it would be like, but doesnt cite trump as having said it. Maybe i missed it. Can you pull the quote from the article for me?
I don’t know what to tell you. I directly copied it from the article. It’s the 6th paragraph. If you can’t find it, that’s not my fault.
The people deciding are the people who work for him.My bad I see that paragraph now. The article says trump filed the complaints which are a precursor to a lawsuit, so this will have to go to court.
Here is the exact Trump quote from another source.
![]()
Trump acknowledges he's seeking 'a lot of money' in damages from DOJ
Trump said he'll ultimately get to decide if he gets the money, when asked about a New York Times report that he's seeking $230 million in damages from the Justice Department.www.nbcnews.com
* can give you half a dozen more, including video.
The people deciding are the people who work for him.
It won’t have to go to court. If he decides to reject his own claim (which are very strong according to him), then he can take it to court.My bad I see that paragraph now. The article says trump filed the complaints which are a precursor to a lawsuit, so this will have to go to court.
Then I agree its an ethical problem and should not happen. In this case it should be forced into the courts. It would some serious issues if a president could file a claim against the government and then be in a position to where they could leverage the people hes over to approve that claim.It won’t have to go to court. If he decides to reject his own claim (which are very strong according to him), then he can take it to court.
But he could just pay the claim before then too.
It shouldn’t go anywhere till he’s out of office.Then I agree its an ethical problem and should not happen. In this case it should be forced into the courts. It would some serious issues if a president could file a claim against the government and then be in a position to where they could leverage the people hes over to approve that claim.
Im on board with you here.
It shouldn’t go anywhere till he’s out of office.
If it goes before the court, Trump is both the plaintiff and the defense. Total conflict of interest.
Trump doesn’t care about ethics or conflicts of interest. Especially after SCOTUS decides the president is not subject to criminal prosecution.Yep, I cant disagree. This shouldn't happen, but then all the lawfare that caused it to get to this point shouldn't have happened either..
Trump doesn’t care about ethics or conflicts of interest. Especially after SCOTUS decides the president is not subject to criminal prosecution.
I don’t consider the DoJ trying to recover and safeguard classified documents to be lawfare. That seems like the normal thing to do. It certainly boggles the mind that the person who stole and hid the documents would be paid hundreds of millions of dollars because they were inconvenienced by the DoJ trying to protect national security.
None of that is true.Well, the debate has been had many times, trump said he declassified them. The FBI knew he had them but didnt take them, told him to put another lock on the door. Biden had classified documents and the left didnt care.
Lawfare.
None of that is true.
Trump never told the DoJ he declassified them.
The FBI was told that Trump turned over everything (which is a lie).
Biden has nothing to do with it.
Funny how he wasn't a criminal until he declared he was running for President. And BAM, 91< as in 91 charges were filed against him all at once, and you expect us to not realize the reason the lawfare was implemented against him? You got greedy and went WAY overboard. And you are still trying the same stupid tactic that was a failure to begin with.
You dumbasses got him elected.Thank you, now pay him back what you cost him. Use your own money to do it, because we did cause the problem...
Dude. He is going for a quarter of a billion dollars for emotional distress and all you can say is that it’s not uncommon for the gov to get sued?!Sadly it’s not uncommon for the govt to be sued and settle lawsuits
Trump filed these claims back in 2023 and 2024…xiden stonewalled justice