Trump wants $230,000,000.00 from the US taxpayer.

[Marener]

Again, those weren't classified "documents". That was classified "information", in non-document form.

As such there is a clearly different requirement of proving the information was classified, or derived from classified documents.

There’s also precedent with Reagan, who has classified information in diaries he kept after leaving office.

 

[Marener]

Yeah but Hur said xiden did it willfully

And comey said Clinton did the same. On the illegals server she never told Obama about

Hur said there was evidence he did it willfully but not sufficient evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

There’s a difference.

 

[Marener]

Really when was Trump convicted of these charges beyond a reasonable doubt?

The head legally appointed lawyer said Biden willfully retained and diclosed docs but was too old to be prosecuted

A prosecutor assessed that the evidence against Trump was sufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

A prosecutor assessed the evidence against Biden was insufficient to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[struth]

Hur said there was evidence he did it willfully but not sufficient evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

There’s a difference.

Because xiden we too senile

Geez dembot catch up, he was trying to be nice to his boss, and you dembots still voted for him

You are right xiden couldn’t prove it beyond a readable doubt against Trump, there is a difference

 

[Marener]

Because xiden we too senile

Geez dembot catch up, he was trying to be nice to his boss, and you dembots still voted for him

You are right xiden couldn’t prove it beyond a readable doubt against Trump, there is a difference

Prosecutors don’t charge people when there’s insufficient evidence.

Your claims that Hur decided he broke the law are false.

 

[Mac-7]

Haha, technically trumps the only one of those three who has been found guilty ins m actual court. You’re living in a different reality

A bullshit kangaroo court

 

[Slade3200]

A bullshit kangaroo court

So you say. But in reality it was a real court with a real judge and a real jury where real evidence was presented. Sorry you don’t like their verdict

 

[Mac-7]

So you say. But in reality it was a real court with a real judge and a real jury where real evidence was presented. Sorry you don’t like their verdict

Every accused person in Nazi Germany was found guilty in a german court of law

 

[ThisIsMe]

Actually, it's also that they can't prove intent.
It's like if somebody is shopping and accidently puts something in his pocket.
And when confronted, empties out his pockets, and pays for the item.

As opposed to the guy who insists there's nothing in his pockets. That he showed them everything in his pockets. And finally runs out of the store when they aren't looking.

"Oopsie how did these classified documents get in my garage and at the Penn biden center".

I dont buy they were accidently put in his personal items by mistake and then NARA didnt know they were missing for 30 years.

Biden as a senator ended up in possession of classified materials at his home. That doesnt happen by accident. He knew they were there.

 

[Marener]

"Oopsie how did these classified documents get in my garage and at the Penn biden center".

I dont buy they were accidently put in his personal items by mistake and then NARA didnt know they were missing for 30 years.

Biden as a senator ended up in possession of classified materials at his home. That doesnt happen by accident. He knew they were there.

You’re entitled to your opinion, but that doesn’t mean the same as having evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[Slade3200]

Every accused person in Nazi Germany was found guilty in a german court of law

And???

 

[Mac-7]

And???

What do you think it means?

A kangaroo court in nazi germany is no different from one in new york city

 

[Slade3200]

What do you think it means?

A kangaroo court in nazi germany is no different from one in new york city

It’s a sad day that you seriously compare our legal system to that of Nazi Germany. Can’t think of anything more unpatriotic. That’s a pretty low tactic

 

[Mac-7]

It’s a sad day that you seriously compare our legal system to that of Nazi Germany. Can’t think of anything more unpatriotic. That’s a pretty low tactic

I am not commenting on the entire legal system

 

[struth]

Prosecutors don’t charge people when there’s insufficient evidence.

Your claims that Hur decided he broke the law are false.

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

There are a host of reasons why someone wouldn't get charged, for example, if they are senile.

 

[Marener]

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

There are a host of reasons why someone wouldn't get charged, for example, if they are senile.

Here, the reason is that the evidence is insufficient. See. I knew you didn't read the report.

 

[struth]

Here, the reason is that the evidence is insufficient. See. I knew you didn't read the report.

View attachment 1177862
View attachment 1177863
View attachment 1177864
View attachment 1177865

Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retainedand disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a privatecitizen. These materials included (1) marked classified documents about military andforeign policy in Afghanistan, and (2) notebooks containing Mr. Biden's handwrittenentries about issues of national security and foreign policy implicating sensitiveintelligence sources and methods. FBI agents recovered these materials from thegarage, offices, and basement den in Mr. Biden's Wilmington, Delaware home.
Prosecution of Mr.Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating andmitigating factors set forth in the Department of Justice's Principles of FederalProsecution. For these reasons, we decline prosecution of Mr. Biden.

 

[Marener]

Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retainedand disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a privatecitizen. These materials included (1) marked classified documents about military andforeign policy in Afghanistan, and (2) notebooks containing Mr. Biden's handwrittenentries about issues of national security and foreign policy implicating sensitiveintelligence sources and methods. FBI agents recovered these materials from thegarage, offices, and basement den in Mr. Biden's Wilmington, Delaware home.

And that evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. You forgot to mention that. It's literally the next sentence:

However, for the reasons summarized below, we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Didn't you know that you have to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?

 

[struth]

And that evidence was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. You forgot to mention that.

Didn't you know that you have to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?

Prosecution of Mr.Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating andmitigating factors set forth in the Department of Justice's Principles of FederalProsecution. For these reasons, we decline prosecution of Mr. Biden.

Those reasons being he was senile

 

[postman]

What’s the difference between disclosing classified documents, like Clinton., and just classieed information, like xiden and Ames?

Yeah but Hur said xiden did it willfully

And comey said Clinton did the same. On the illegals server she never told Obama about

This is where the legal requirements of proof come in.
The Clinton documents contained markings like (S) or (C) to indicate
they contained classified information. But classified documents have headers and footers that clearly say "CLASSIFIED". Meaning that you can tell a classified documents by just taking even a quick glance at it.
Classified information has to be read by someone with the knowledge of the type of information, or specifics of the information to make that determination.

To put it simply, a grade school child can tell if something is a classified document, where the same isn't true for classified information.