Trump wants $230,000,000.00 from the US taxpayer.

Stupid question. This is not about me.

But as long as we're going down that road, why are you okay with Biden doing it?
Apparently it’s about me though?

I’m opposed to Biden doing it. Thanks for asking!

Why are you okay with Trump doing it?
 
Why is lawfare different from any other unfair prosecution. Stuff that happens every day.

How’s it different from what happened to Hunter Biden or James Comey etc etc. do you condemn those prosecutions?
Comey and biden were guilty of crimes that are prosecuted by the government all the time

Trump was ensnared in a kangaroo court run by his politicsl enemies
 
Apparently it’s about me though?

I’m opposed to Biden doing it. Thanks for asking!

Why are you okay with Trump doing it?
I'm not either.

Can we get back to the topic now?
 
No, a comparison with what Trump said and did, is daddy promised me a shinny red bicycle, and instead he tore down the shed with my old bicycle in it, and threw everything into the dumpster.
Your excuse is pathetic
 
I'm not either.

Can we get back to the topic now?
Surely you don’t think Trump deserves to be paid hundreds of millions of dollars because the DoJ investigated and prosecuted him for stealing highly classified documents, right?

After all, you don’t support Trump stealing them.

And that is the topic.
 
You can prove that Biden was in possession of classified materials, but you can't prove he intended to keep them.
Especially since he gave them all back when asked to.
 
Yup and the absurd amount he wants in damages. Let me ask do you think everybody who feels the have been unfairly prosecuted should be entitled to what Trump wants?

The level of disconnect and entitlement here is insane. It’s all a game though,.. right?
They should ask for as much as they want. I’ve seen huge numbers

Doesn’t mean you always get what you ask for

Moreover not everyone is in the same position

If a doctor gets slandered does he not lose more then say a guy bagging groceries?
 
You clearly didn’t because you didn’t realize I linked to it
Linking to is doesn’t mean you read it.

Because clearly you didn’t read it.
 
This is why Trump has had to fire so many career prosecutors.
The one's who know the law, and who follow the law.
The one's who don't stand for vindictive prosecutions or selective prosecutions.
And who actually follow DOJ indictment policy, and not just get an indictment knowing they have no chance of proving the flimsy evidence they presented to the grand jury beyond a reasonable doubt.
Correct he fired many to ensure he had people that would follow the law and not illegally appoint people like Smith

As far as Hur I can’t disagree with his conclusion. We don’t prosecute criminals that are senile
 
They can prove both that Trump was possession of classified materials and that he intended to keep them for years, after he knew he had them.
 
Surely you don’t think Trump deserves to be paid hundreds of millions of dollars because the DoJ investigated and prosecuted him for stealing highly classified documents, right?

After all, you don’t support Trump stealing them.

And that is the topic.
So, that's a no then to sticking to the thread topic. You're going to continue to personalize this and try to make this about me.

Have a great day. Go find someone else willing to put up with your annoying postings.
 
Linking to is doesn’t mean you read it.

Because clearly you didn’t read it.
Of course I did, hence why I corrected your lie and linked you to the report

And why of course even since then you haven’t been able to quote from it your incorrect claim…because it’s not in there
 
No, a comparison with what Trump said and did, is daddy promised me a shinny red bicycle, and instead he tore down the shed with my old bicycle in it, and threw everything into the dumpster.
Well, that explains some of your issues Ratty
 
Correct he fired many to ensure he had people that would follow the law and not illegally appoint people like Smith

As far as Hur I can’t disagree with his conclusion. We don’t prosecute criminals that are senile
Yes, he hired people like Bove and Bondi, who let a convicted child sex trafficker out of a secure prison.
 
Yes, he hired people like Bove and Bondi, who let a convicted child sex trafficker out of a secure prison.
You really, really don't want to go there. The number of violent criminals Democrats have allowed out of prison is legend.
 
15th post
So, that's a no then to sticking to the thread topic. You're going to continue to personalize this and try to make this about me.

Have a great day. Go find someone else willing to put up with your annoying postings.
The thread topic is Trump giving himself hundreds of millions of dollars because he was so injured from being prosecuted for stealing highly classified documents.

And I asked your opinion of this.

I guess that’s somehow offensive to you?
 
Of course I did, hence why I corrected your lie and linked you to the report

And why of course even since then you haven’t been able to quote from it your incorrect claim…because it’s not in there
The report says exactly what I claimed. You’d know this if you’d have read it.
 
I'm not so sure about that, but since he was elected, we'll never need to go down that constitutional crisis road.
It wouldn't be a constitutional crisis. A private citizen in possession of classified materials, who refused to give them back. And who no longer had any reason to be in possession of them.

A simple case of "lock him up."
 
They can prove both that Trump was possession of classified materials and that he intended to keep them for years, after he knew he had them.
If they could they would have. They failed to do that

However Hur concluded xiden not only willfully retained classified documents illegally, he also disclosed for profit some of it

But was too senile to prosecute

Likewise Comey concluded Clinton willfully retained classified documents, a recklessly keep them on an illegal server, including military documents.
 
Back
Top Bottom