Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 60,981
- 25,577
- 2,173
It’s especially ironic that this investigation occurred under his authority.the first, lodged back in 2023 deals with the Russian hoax
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s especially ironic that this investigation occurred under his authority.the first, lodged back in 2023 deals with the Russian hoax
The evidence is drastically different in both cases, and you’re still ignoring the extra crimes committed by Trump including obstruction of justice, evidence destruction, witness tampering.
You can’t just ignore the facts that don’t fit your narrative.
An embarrassing lie, of course. As any 6 year old can see by reading the different charges and looking at the publicly available evidence.
People, stop giving these idiotic lies attention. They are designed solely to beg for attention.
Democrats are the real flesh eaters.Grab your ankles, MAGAts!
You paid his legal fees. Now you get to pay twice!
Not really, the hoax was started by the Obama admin because he won.It’s especially ironic that this investigation occurred under his authority.
You’re ignoring a lot.Im not ignoring anything, you are ignoring everything about the biden crimes. How many times do I have to say that I dont care if trump is punished. He should be if he committed crimes. Im just trying to get you and the rest of the dems to see their own party the same way.
Mueller was appointed under Trump.Not really, the hoax was started by the Obama admin because he won.
And you think it entitles him to a quarter of a Billion dollars?! Are you nuts? Do you know how many people get unfairly prosecuted, even jailed and later found to be innocent? Should we give that much money to all those people as well or do you think Trump is special or more in need?More than emotional distress. Try again dembot
Yes what happened to Trump was unprecedented.
I have no idea, not sure if all the cost he had, and what not.And you think it entitles him to a quarter of a Billion dollars?! Are you nuts? Do you know how many people get unfairly prosecuted, even jailed and later found to be innocent? Should we give that much money to all those people as well or do you think Trump is special or more in need?
He's gonna get it too. Her has already said he can do it without any help.President Trump is demanding that the Justice Department pay him about $230 million in compensation for the federal investigations into him, according to people familiar with the matter, who added that any settlement might ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him or those in his orbit.
The situation has no parallel in American history, as Mr. Trump, a presidential candidate, was pursued by federal law enforcement and eventually won the election, taking over the very government that must now review his claims. It is also the starkest example yet of potential ethical conflicts created by installing the president’s former lawyers atop the Justice Department.
***********************************************************************************
Given that the Trump Administration is an open sewer of corruption, it is no surprise that he wants 1/4 billion from us. Trump has his sycophants in place, so he will be paid what he wants. The Trump family which has made billions off his cryptocurrency scams also has an insatiable appetite for more money. The monetization of the presidency continues. Trump's greed has no bounds.
Let's face it. The US we knew is no longer. We live in a kleptocracy.
Xiden should have settled in 2023 when it was filed. His stonewalling has only cost Americans more money for his political prosecutionHe's gonna get it too. Her has already said he can do it without any help.
Besides, he has replaced all the authorities with his loyal tRumplings.
They will sing a happy song and write the check:
Oompah Loompah Doopity Doo!
We Glady Give Our Budget To You!
Oompah Loompah Doopity Dee!
We're Completely Owned As Anyone Can See!!!
Well he was found guilty of multiple felonies by a jury and the other cases never went to trial. For him to ask for a quarter a billion is insane. How about you share bottle of your outrage in regard to the criminal justice system for those unjustly treated by cops or those innocent people who get arrested. Mostly minoritiesI have no idea, not sure if all the cost he had, and what not.
I have no idea how much we give to each individual. Don’t care. That’s why we have these settlement discussions
That case has nothing to do with these claimsWell he was found guilty of multiple felonies by a jury and the other cases never went to trial. For him to ask for a quarter a billion is insane. How about you share bottle of your outrage in regard to the criminal justice system for those unjustly treated by cops or those innocent people who get arrested. Mostly minorities
I certainly does. It shows that he is good felony activity as found by a jury of his peers. So don’t play righteous like he was some innocent guy getting persecutedThat case has nothing to do with these claims
Try and keep up dembot, you are way out of your league
No that was a state case, this involves federal issuesI certainly does. It shows that he is good felony activity as found by a jury of his peers. So don’t play righteous like he was some innocent guy getting persecuted
You don't sound insane at all.Democrats are the real flesh eaters.
Yes that was a state case showing that he is a criminal.No that was a state case, this involves federal issues
Try and keep up debot
The state case has nothing to do with the claims brought with the fedsYes that was a state case showing that he is a criminal.
You’re avoiding the debate. I told you why I brought it up. Never claimed it had anything to specifically do with the Fed case.The state case has nothing to do with the claims brought with the feds
You can’t be anymore clueless
No I am not. I am not the one that defected and stated talking about something completely unrelated to the topicYou’re avoiding the debate. I told you why I brought it up. Never claimed it had anything to specifically do with the Fed case.