Trump vetoes defense bill.

[Astrostar]

Trump's veto of massive defense bill sets up possible override vote next week

President Donald Trump on Wednesday vetoed the sweeping defense bill that both chambers of Congress recently passed by veto-proof majorities, setting up what could be the first veto override of his presidency, which would pit members of his own party against him.

www.cnn.com

What else would you expect from a serial, aggressive, committed draft dodger, who considers our military to be "losers and suckers?"

 

[toobfreak]

Trump's veto of massive defense bill sets up possible override vote next week

President Donald Trump on Wednesday vetoed the sweeping defense bill that both chambers of Congress recently passed by veto-proof majorities, setting up what could be the first veto override of his presidency, which would pit members of his own party against him.

www.cnn.com

What else would you expect from a serial, aggressive, committed draft dodger, who considers our military to be "losers and suckers?"

No matter what side Trump is on, you oppose it. VIVA LA TRUMP. Best President of America ever.

 

[Auld Phart]

Good


Maybe now they'll have to read it, and say "WTF?"

 

[JGalt]

I believe that was the NDAA defense bill that he vetoed, not the budget/stimulus bill. I could be wrong, but that's what it sounds like.

 

[bendog]

Cool. Unless congress can somehow override it before they wind down, Biden has another bargaining chip.

I hope doesnt' veto or pocket veto the aid bill. It's a bad bill, with pork for the 1% and it should cause Moscow Mitch to have vegetables and eggs thrown his way …. but some workers really need the help.

 

[bendog]

I believe that was the NDAA defense bill that he vetoed, not the budget/stimulus bill. I could be wrong, but that's what it sounds like.

Oh shit. I thought Trump grew a pair. I should have known.

 

[JGalt]

I believe that was the NDAA defense bill that he vetoed, not the budget/stimulus bill. I could be wrong, but that's what it sounds like.

Oh shit. I thought Trump grew a pair. I should have known.

Just wait for it, the omnibus spending bill could be the next one to get the veto. Biden's not gonna walk into a cushy job. He's gonna have to work his ass off for his salary.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Override time. Time to cut the cord for the GOP. Time to jettison Trump.

 

[OldLady]

That's how it was meant to be, but Mitch incorporated them.

In the House, the defense and Homeland Security spending, among other things, was voted on separately from the coronavirus bill, which was included in a separate package. That was done so Democrat members could vote against defense spending and border security elements in the legislation without putting the actual coronavirus relief in jeopardy.

But all of the legislation was voted on once in the Senate, making it in effect one piece of legislation representatives had to decide "yea" or "nay" on. That fact roiled many conservative elected officials.

Foreign aid in year-end spending package attached to coronavirus aid causes uproar

 

[JGalt]

Override time. Time to cut the cord for the GOP. Time to jettison Trump.

Why? Are we at war or something? President Trump has built up our military to the strongest in the world, over the last four years. He started in motion the bringing back of troops, and peace is breaking out in the ME.

Of course, there's China. But once their butt-boy Joe Biden gets seated, they'll back off.

Why are you pussies whining? Are you scared or something?

 

[OldLady]

I believe that was the NDAA defense bill that he vetoed, not the budget/stimulus bill. I could be wrong, but that's what it sounds like.

Oh shit. I thought Trump grew a pair. I should have known.

Just wait for it, the omnibus spending bill could be the next one to get the veto. Biden's not gonna walk into a cushy job. He's gonna have to work his ass off for his salary.

I believe by vetoing one, he's vetoed them all. They were tied together in the senate.

 

[JGalt]

I believe that was the NDAA defense bill that he vetoed, not the budget/stimulus bill. I could be wrong, but that's what it sounds like.

Oh shit. I thought Trump grew a pair. I should have known.

Just wait for it, the omnibus spending bill could be the next one to get the veto. Biden's not gonna walk into a cushy job. He's gonna have to work his ass off for his salary.

I believe by vetoing one, he's vetoed them all. They were tied together in the senate.

Well that's what happens when Democrats and Republicans in Congress "reach across the aisle." A complete clusterf*ck.

The train of bipartisanship done left the station a long time ago.

 

[hjmick]

As I understand it, there are enough votes in Congress to override this veto. Which is exactly what will happen it seems. That'll certainly toast his chestnuts...

 

[hjmick]

I believe that was the NDAA defense bill that he vetoed, not the budget/stimulus bill. I could be wrong, but that's what it sounds like.

Oh shit. I thought Trump grew a pair. I should have known.

Just wait for it, the omnibus spending bill could be the next one to get the veto. Biden's not gonna walk into a cushy job. He's gonna have to work his ass off for his salary.

I believe by vetoing one, he's vetoed them all. They were tied together in the senate.

Nope, two separate signatures or vetoes.

 

[JGalt]

The President's full statement:

"I am returning, without my approval, H.R. 6395, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (the "Act"). My Administration recognizes the importance of the Act to our national security. Unfortunately, the Act fails to include critical national security measures, includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military's history, and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions. It is a 'gift' to China and Russia.

No one has worked harder, or approved more money for the military, than I have -- over $2 trillion. During my 4 years, with the support of many others, we have almost entirely rebuilt the United States military, which was totally depleted when I took office. Your failure to terminate the very dangerous national security risk of Section 230 will make our intelligence virtually impossible to conduct without everyone knowing what we are doing at every step.

The Act fails even to make any meaningful changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, despite bipartisan calls for repealing that provision. Section 230 facilitates the spread of foreign disinformation online, which is a serious threat to our national security and election integrity. It must be repealed.

Additionally, the Act includes language that would require the renaming of certain military installations. Over the course of United States history, these locations have taken on significance to the American story and those who have helped write it that far transcends their namesakes. My Administration respects the legacy of the millions of American servicemen and women who have served with honor at these military bases, and who, from these locations, have fought, bled, and died for their country. From these facilities, we have won two World Wars. I have been clear in my opposition to politically motivated attempts like this to wash away history and to dishonor the immense progress our country has fought for in realizing our founding principles.

The Act also restricts the President's ability to preserve our Nation's security by arbitrarily limiting the amount of military construction funds that can be used to respond to a national emergency. In a time when adversaries have the means to directly attack the homeland, the President must be able to safeguard the American people without having to wait for congressional authorization. The Act also contains an amendment that would slow down the rollout of nationwide 5G, especially in rural areas.

Numerous provisions of the Act directly contradict my Administration's foreign policy, particularly my efforts to bring our troops home. I oppose endless wars, as does the American public. Over bipartisan objections, however, this Act purports to restrict the President's ability to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, Germany, and South Korea. Not only is this bad policy, but it is unconstitutional. Article II of the Constitution makes the President the Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States and vests in him the executive power. Therefore, the decision regarding how many troops to deploy and where, including in Afghanistan, Germany, and South Korea, rests with him. The Congress may not arrogate this authority to itself directly or indirectly as purported spending restrictions.

For all of these reasons, I cannot support this bill. My Administration has taken strong actions to help keep our Nation safe and support our service members. I will not approve this bill, which would put the interests of the Washington, D.C. establishment over those of the American people. It is my duty to return H.R. 6395 to the House of Representatives without my approval."

Trump vetoes defense spending bill, says it's 'gift' to China and Russia, lacks Section 230 reforms

 

[airplanemechanic]

As I understand it, there are enough votes in Congress to override this veto. Which is exactly what will happen it seems. That'll certainly toast his chestnuts...

Not so simple. House doesn't think they have the votes as many republicans have said they won't go against the president's veto.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Trump's veto of massive defense bill sets up possible override vote next week

President Donald Trump on Wednesday vetoed the sweeping defense bill that both chambers of Congress recently passed by veto-proof majorities, setting up what could be the first veto override of his presidency, which would pit members of his own party against him.

www.cnn.com

What else would you expect from a serial, aggressive, committed draft dodger, who considers our military to be "losers and suckers?"

You mean the man that approved more funding for the military and rebuilt the military more in 4 years than any other president?

 

[OldLady]

I believe that was the NDAA defense bill that he vetoed, not the budget/stimulus bill. I could be wrong, but that's what it sounds like.

Oh shit. I thought Trump grew a pair. I should have known.

Just wait for it, the omnibus spending bill could be the next one to get the veto. Biden's not gonna walk into a cushy job. He's gonna have to work his ass off for his salary.

I believe by vetoing one, he's vetoed them all. They were tied together in the senate.

Nope, two separate signatures or vetoes.

This is very confusing. No one seems to know what they're talking about. I'm getting so many different stories I give up.

 

[miketx]

Trump's veto of massive defense bill sets up possible override vote next week

President Donald Trump on Wednesday vetoed the sweeping defense bill that both chambers of Congress recently passed by veto-proof majorities, setting up what could be the first veto override of his presidency, which would pit members of his own party against him.

www.cnn.com

What else would you expect from a serial, aggressive, committed draft dodger, who considers our military to be "losers and suckers?"

 

[jbrownson0831]

Trump's veto of massive defense bill sets up possible override vote next week

President Donald Trump on Wednesday vetoed the sweeping defense bill that both chambers of Congress recently passed by veto-proof majorities, setting up what could be the first veto override of his presidency, which would pit members of his own party against him.

www.cnn.com

What else would you expect from a serial, aggressive, committed draft dodger, who considers our military to be "losers and suckers?"

You mean the guy who has one more military exemption than the President? That draft dodger?