- Thread starter
- #41
Lady, I have accused you of lying in numerous threads and your response is almost always to fail to respond, even when I post links to support my allegations. In this instance of you accusing me of lying, keeping in mind my post accused you of using speculative opinions, you have proven my point. Your post is nothing more than speculative opinion.First, your assessment of Clinton as a known criminal and congenital liar are subjective opinions as is your allegation that Clinton sold access to the US government. You have listed a long list of unproven allegations in your "scandals list". Trump scandals are, on the other hand, created from his own recorded comments, video's and court documents, sworn testimony and the public record.Trump did so great during all three debates that the flood of Republicans vowing not to support him or vote for him continues to this day and his poll numbers continue to plummet. He is being given less than a 10% chance of winning vs Clinton's 90% chance. Historically Red Republican states are now being looked at as questionable and battleground states. The man has become one of the most despised candidates in American history.
Perhaps you'd care to entertain this query.....
As the candidate you have chosen is known as a criminal and congenital liar, revealed to have sold access to the United States Government, ....
.....and the other is acclaimed as a successful entrepreneur, who has promised to embrace the Constitution.....
....what is the ar gument in favor of the former over the latter?
There are several Republicans I would have and could have supported over Clinton, but I am not being given that choice. The Republicans chose an unhinged loose cannon with a horrible temperament and mental issues as well as a horrifying lack of knowledge or even motivation to learn about the important issues.
The sane candidate with experience will get my begrudging support.
You have been revealed as a liar so often, that this post is simply gilding the lily.
The pretense is transparent....so much so that even the Liberal house organ...
.... the Mexican paper...the NYTimes states:
"In April 2012, representatives from Qatar were apparently hoping to get “five minutes” with former President Bill Clinton while in New York to present him with a $1 million check for his foundation as a birthday gift from the previous year.
While it is unclear whether that meeting ever took place, the offer,mentioned in one of thousands of hacked Clinton campaign emailsreleased by WikiLeaks last week, was an example of the complex ethical issues the Clinton Foundation faced in managing relationships with foreign governments when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state. It also raised questions about whether the foundation had fully followed procedures it had voluntarily agreed to in order to avoid those very issues."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/16/us/politics/wikileaks-bill-clinton-foundation.html
In here last debate, Bill's wife made it known that you has no understanding of the role of the Supreme Court, nor respect for the Constitution....
..yet you will support the criminal enterprise over Founders' America.
What more is there to say.
I never lie, as shown in my every post: documented, linked and source.
As an example.....the misnomer that you tried to slip by...."Red States"
Your motivation is always to shield communists.