That’s how the hotline was set up. For everyone. Still is. Because of the high volume of vet and LGbTQ groups that had specialized issues they decided to give additional outlets to better handle the volume and better serve their needs. That’s why there is a dedicated line for vets and an option for LGBtQ
Should we integrate the vet operators trained in PTSD etc to do the same? Better serve everybody and not single out a segment?
I have to strongly disagree with the comparison to vets.
We have a vital national interest in keeping our armed forces strong and well-staffed. Providing counselling services to veterans, helps keep potential recruits from thinking they should not join becuase they will be ignored after their time in service.
There is also obligation on the part of the country, as veterans are often in need of such services specifially due to having served in our armed forces. This is something that they are actually entitled to (and more), whereas the sense if entitlement felt by the LGBT-Q++ community is entirely self-generated.
The veteran's hotline is run by the Department of Veterans Affairs, which is a cabinet level agency. There is no such federal agency that serves LGBT-Q++, though I have no doubt many Democrats and "not Democrats" would like to see one.
None of this is to say that I don't believe there should be a hotline for LGBT-Q++ people in crises. I think the various advocacy groups should run more than one of them. I won't have to worry about whether they are agendized. I would assume that they are, as is their right to be.
Many LGBT-Q folk are Democrats (or "not Democrats"). As such, they view any disagreement as hostility, and would be offended and probably hang up if the caller were
not agendized - to match their own agenda.
Nothing wrong with LGBT hotline per se, but it should not be the only choice in a tax-funded hotline besides staying on the line for "all other." If we give a special line for LGBT-Q++ why not a special line for problem gamblers, recent divorcees, recent widows, jobless, homeless, abused spouses, abusers who want help, agoraphobics, etc?
Why not?
Because you would have to go to three or four digits to list all possible reasons to call a crises hotline, and that would cause long waits to listen to the menu. The reason LGBT-Q++ got its own line is that they are the current Democrat and "not Democrat" political flavor of the time. I'm only surprised they did not put an Option 4, for illegal immigrants.