Trump to create religious office in White House, target 'anti-Christian bias'.

This was not an EO aimed at that, however, using your logic that discrimination can also happen by excluding references to things in his EO, then if he doesn't make any EOs against LGBT people, then that would indicate support for it.
That is not exactly what I said . I said that the EO]s language is discriminatory. It sets the stage for actual discrimination which can happen by favoring one group over another. But if you want to talk about his orders, he has already targeted trans people in a number of ways . He has vowed to stamp them out!!
 
Last edited:
This will depend on your definition of "hurt". If he specifically tries to pass laws or EOs targeting anyone who is LGBT, I'd say he, and the government has no right to interfere, as it is not a power of the government to do. If, however, he does like he did in roe, and sends any legislation about it back to the states, that's not hurting them, that's restoring the government to its rightful place.
Bull!! He is just violating his oath of office by failing to defend and protect the constitutional rights of the people by allowing the states to discriminate.
 
Last edited:
I think people get so emotional about this because, we've expanded the power of the government so far beyond what it was ever intended to be, that when someone wants to roll back some of that power, it makes people go crazy. If we had just stuck to what the cotus said, none of this would be an issue.
And none of this would be an issue if people just would mind their own damned business and stay out of the lives of people who they disapprove of.
 
Islam isn't a real religion like Christianity.
If you take away Islam all that you have left is atheism (just a play on your statement that if you take away Christianity all that you have is atheism-see how that works?)

Happy Fatwa, Kid .They're coming for you
 
Last edited:
Thank you. That’s the atheist position on abortion. And that’s why if you remove Christianity from government the default is atheism. Killing children in the womb is godless
A clump of cells is not a child.

To claim that you know what God wants is arrogant and delusional

Your Christian God is not the only God

Ask your God-or any God- how she would chose if it came down to the life of the mother or the unborn fetus.

None of this is about protecting the unborn All of it is about subjugating and controlling women

You seem to be avoiding me. Cat got your tongue ??
 
But they could always become a target as they have in the past .Remember his own Muslim travel ban? They are vulnerable. I'm still waiting for you to provide examples of the "frequent anti Christian rhetoric" that has been alleged
PS I now remember. He vowed to reinstate the travel ban now, AND to expel those protesting the brutal treatment of Palastinians at the hand of the Israelis and aided and abetted by the US . What Hamas did on that October day was awful but these people are not Hamas but are paying a high price.
 
If you take away Islam all that you have left is atheism (just a play on your statement that if you take away Christianity all that you have is atheism-see how that works?)

Happy Fatwa, Kid .They're coming for you
Actually radical Islam is the opposite side of the same coin as atheist regimes. They both have the same goals for America, capitalism, and Christianity; their demise.
 
Actually radical Islam is the opposite side of the same coin as atheist regimes. They both have the same goals for America, capitalism, and Christianity; their demise.
Actually radical Christianity is the opposite side of the same coin as Fascism They both want to destroy our Constitutional Republic, The only difference is that the Christians want a theocracy as an excuse for autocracy while the Fascists are slightly more honest and just want raw power for the sake of power
 
Last edited:
Actually radical Christianity is the opposite side of the same coin as Fascism They both want to destroy our Constitutional Republic, The only difference is that the Christians want a theocracy as an excuse for autocracy while the Fascists are slightly more honest and just want raw power for the sake of power
What is 'radical Christianity'? What does one look like? Who is an example of one? My guess is you don't know, because it's just a leftwing talking point that sounds good. Are radical Christians those who try very hard to live according to Jesus' perfect teachings? Shouldn't, then, we ALL strive to be radical Christians?
 
But they could always become a target as they have in the past .Remember his own Muslim travel ban? They are vulnerable. I'm still waiting for you to provide examples of the "frequent anti Christian rhetoric" that has been alleged

There never was a Muslim ban lol, that's a term you dems made up. There was a ban from SOME Muslim countries that are hot beds of terrorism.

I'm still waiting for you to provide examples of the "frequent anti Christian rhetoric" that has been alleged

I've told you twice now, these were what trump had said, and he gave the example he was referring to.
 
What is 'radical Christianity'? What does one look like? Who is an example of one? My guess is you don't know, because it's just a leftwing talking point that sounds good. Are radical Christians those who try very hard to live according to Jesus' perfect teachings? Shouldn't, then, we ALL strive to be radical Christians?
The New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) is a Christian supremacist theological belief and controversial movement associated with the far-right that combines elements of Pentecostalism, evangelicalism, and the Seven Mountain Mandate to advocate for spiritual warfare to bring about Christian dominion over all aspects of ...

New Apostolic Reformation - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Apostolic_Reformation#:~:text=The New Apostolic Reformation (NAR,dominion over all aspects of society

Christian Fascism!!! They want to destroy secular society
Long a fringe movement of the American Christian right, it has been characterized as "one of the most important shifts in Christianity in modern times".[3] The NAR's prominence and power have increased since the 2016 election of Donald Trump as US president. Theology professor André Gagné, author of a 2024 book on the movement, has characterized it as "inherently political" and said it threatens to "subvert democracy".[4
 

Attachments

  • 1739537401108.webp
    1739537401108.webp
    194 bytes · Views: 2
Last edited:
Bull!! He is just violating his oath of office by failing to defend and protect the constitutional rights of the people by allowing the states to discriminate.
What constitutional rights? Anything not delegated to the government by the cotus is a state issue
 
And none of this would be an issue if people just would mind their own damned business and stay out of the lives of people who they disapprove of.

I agree, everyone needs to mind their own business, this includes states and the federal government.
 
A clump of cells is not a child.

To claim that you know what God wants is arrogant and delusional

Your Christian God is not the only God

Ask your God-or any God- how she would chose if it came down to the life of the mother or the unborn fetus.

None of this is about protecting the unborn All of it is about subjugating and controlling women

You seem to be avoiding me. Cat got your tongue ??

None of this is about protecting the unborn All of it is about subjugating and controlling women

That's not true. Nobody is trying to control women. If a women wants to sew a horn to her head and call herself a unicorn, nobody is going to stop her. If she wants to kill an unborn baby, people have something to say about that.

If it were about controlling women, men would be demanding that all women should be in thr kitchen. And while I recognize there are SOME people who belive that should be the case, nobody is proposing legislation or taking steps to make it happen.

Women can do whatever they want, and nobody cares, it's only when it comes to a baby that some people take notice.
 
There never was a Muslim ban lol, that's a term you dems made up. There was a ban from SOME Muslim countries that are hot beds of terrorism.

In 2017, President Trump signed an executive order banning people from six Muslim-majority countries from entering the USA, and slamming the door on refugees. After being temporarily stopped multiple times, the US Supreme Court overturned a block on the devastating ban in June.

The order demonises the vulnerable – those who have fled torturers, warlords and dictators – and those who simply want to be with their families. It is essentially a licence to discriminate, disguised as a 'national security measure'.
And now he is targeting Palastinians protesting the genocide in Gaza
 
Last edited:
I've told you twice now, these were what trump had said, and he gave the example he was referring to.
You have not told me a damned thing . What "example" Now it is "something that Trump said" which most likely was bullshit and you are still not saying what it was.

You gotta be shitting me with that codswallop.
 
Last edited:
That's not true. Nobody is trying to control women. If a women wants to sew a horn to her head and call herself a unicorn, nobody is going to stop her. If she wants to kill an unborn baby, people have something to say about that.

If it were about controlling women, men would be demanding that all women should be in thr kitchen. And while I recognize there are SOME people who belive that should be the case, nobody is proposing legislation or taking steps to make it happen.

Women can do whatever they want, and nobody cares, it's only when it comes to a baby that some people take notice.
More inane codswallop . You're either a liar or a fool
 
Thank you. That’s the atheist position on abortion. And that’s why if you remove Christianity from government the default is atheism. Killing children in the womb is godless
So for you it's the Christian Highway or no highway at all? Your faith is strong but your critical thinking skills are nonexistent.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom