WHC Dinner gunman Cole Allen’s full anti-Trump manifesto released

JGalt

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2011
Messages
84,658
Reaction score
112,284
Points
3,635
It's full of the usual stuff we've all been accustomed to hearing from Democrats.

Read White House Correspondents’ Dinner gunman Cole Allen’s full anti-Trump manifesto​


"Accused White House Correspondents’ Dinner gunman Cole Allen sent a sprawling manifesto to family members about 10 minutes before Saturday’s attack, sources told The Post.

The 1,052-word missive obtained by The Post Sunday morning — signed ā€œCole ā€˜coldForce’ ā€˜Friendly Federal Assassin’ Allenā€ — outlined his ā€œrules of engagementā€ for the shooting and stated he believed it was his righteous duty to target administration officials."

Cole Allen’s manifesto in full:​


Exclusive | Read White House Correspondents’ Dinner gunman Cole Allen’s full anti-Trump manifesto
 
OK, so what was different about this one than the ones posted before in numerous threads? :dunno:

This one has the full account, while those were just snippets. Here it is for those who don't like clicking on links:

"Hello everybody!

So I may have given a lot of people a surprise today. Let me start off by apologizing to everyone whose trust I abused.

I apologize to my parents for saying I had an interview without specifying it was for ā€œMost Wanted.ā€

I apologize to my colleagues and students for saying I had a personal emergency (by the time anyone reads this, I probably most certainly DO need to go to the ER, but can hardly call that not a self-inflicted status.)

I apologize to all of the people I traveled next to, all the workers who handled my luggage, and all the other non-targeted people at the hotel who I put in danger simply by being near.

I apologize to everyone who was abused and/or murdered before this, to all those who suffered before I was able to attempt this, to all who may still suffer after, regardless of my success or failure.

I don’t expect forgiveness, but if I could have seen any other way to get this close, I would have taken it. Again, my sincere apologies.

On to why I did any of this:

I am a citizen of the United States of America.

What my representatives do reflects on me.

And I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.

(Well, to be completely honest, I was no longer willing a long time ago, but this is the first real opportunity I’ve had to do something about it.)

While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.)

Administration officials (not including Mr. Patel): they are targets, prioritized from highest-ranking to lowest

Secret Service: they are targets only if necessary, and to be incapacitated non-lethally if possible (aka, I hope they’re wearing body armor because center mass with shotguns messes up people who aren’t

Hotel Security: not targets if at all possible (aka unless they shoot at me)

Capitol Police: same as Hotel Security

National Guard: same as Hotel Security

Hotel Employees: not targets at all

Guests: not targets at all

In order to minimize casualties I will also be using buckshot rather than slugs (less penetration through walls)

I would still go through most everyone here to get to the targets if it were absolutely necessary (on the basis that most people chose to attend a speech by a pedophile, rapist, and traitor, and are thus complicit) but I really hope it doesn’t come to that.

Rebuttals to objections:​

Objection 1: As a Christian, you should turn the other cheek.

Rebuttal: Turning the other cheek is for when you yourself are oppressed. I’m not the person raped in a detention camp. I’m not the fisherman executed without trial. I’m not a schoolkid blown up or a child starved or a teenage girl abused by the many criminals in this administration.

Turning the other cheek when someone else is oppressed is not Christian behavior; it is complicity in the oppressor’s crimes.

Objection 2: This is not a convenient time for you to do this.

Rebuttal: I need whoever thinks this way to take a couple minutes and realize that the world isn’t about them. Do you think that when I see someone raped or murdered or abused, I should walk on by because it would be ā€œinconvenientā€ for people who aren’t the victim?

This was the best timing and chance of success I could come up with.

Objection 3: You didn’t get them all.

Rebuttal: Gotta start somewhere.

Objection 4: As a half-black, half-white person, you shouldn’t be the one doing this.

Rebuttal: I don’t see anyone else picking up the slack

Objection 5: Yield unto Caesar what is Caesar’s.

Rebuttal: The United States of America are ruled by the law, not by any one or several people. In so far as representatives and judges do not follow the law, no one is required to yield them anything so unlawfully ordered.

I would also like to extend my appreciation to a great many people since I will not be likely to be able to talk with them again (unless the Secret Service is astoundingly incompetent.)

Thank you to my family, both personal and church, for your love over these 31 years.

Thank you to my friends, for your companionship over many years.

Thank you to my colleagues over many jobs, for your positivity and professionalism.

Thank you to my students for your enthusiasm and love of learning.

Thank you to the many acquaintances I’ve met, in person and online, for short interactions and long-term relationships, for your perspectives and inspiration.

Thank you all for everything.

Sincerely,

Cole ā€œcoldForceā€ ā€œFriendly Federal Assassinā€ Allen

PS: Ok now that all the sappy stuff is done, what the hell is the Secret Service doing? Sorry, gonna rant a bit here and drop the formal tone.

Like, I expected security cameras at every bend, bugged hotel rooms, armed agents every 10 feet, metal detectors out the wazoo.

What I got (who knows, maybe they’re pranking me!) is nothing.

No damn security.

Not in transport.

Not in the hotel.

Not in the event.

Like, the one thing that I immediately noticed walking into the hotel is the sense of arrogance.

I walk in with multiple weapons and not a single person there considers the possibility that I could be a threat.

The security at the event is all outside, focused on protestors and current arrivals, because apparently no one thought about what happens if someone checks in the day before.

Like, this level of incompetence is insane, and I very sincerely hope it’s corrected by the time this country gets actually competent leadership again.

Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed s–t.

Actually insane.

Oh and if anyone is curious is how doing something like feels: it’s awful. I want to throw up; I want to cry for all the things I wanted to do and never will, for all the people whose trust this betrays; I experience rage thinking about everything this administration has done.

Can’t really recommend it! Stay in school, kids."
 
Last edited:
His assessment of event security is concerning.

Did the Secret Service not stop the threat? Shifting the blame to "security" issues does nothing but minimize the real problem, just as writing off the attempted assassination by saying "Well he was just crazy" or saying "We have a gun problem."

Does anyone really believe that increasing security or firearms restrictions would stop things like this from happening?
 
Did the Secret Service not stop the threat? Shifting the blame to "security" issues does nothing but minimize the real problem, just as writing off the attempted assassination by saying "Well he was just crazy" or saying "We have a gun problem."

Does anyone really believe that increasing security or firearms restrictions would stop things like this from happening?
Correct.

The real problem is the propagandization and brainwashing at the heart of this. It starts with the Professors in the Universities and then gets reinforced by the media and peers who have all gone through the same mindwashing.
 
Still, his Leeeeroy Jenkins! approach left a lot to be desired as far as results went.....Must have been the dragons. ;)



Thanks. I had no idea about that "Leeeeroy Jenkins" thing until I looked it up.

Damn, I've missed a lot over the last 11 years. :laughing0301:
 
It's full of the usual stuff we've all been accustomed to hearing from Democrats.

Read White House Correspondents’ Dinner gunman Cole Allen’s full anti-Trump manifesto​


"Accused White House Correspondents’ Dinner gunman Cole Allen sent a sprawling manifesto to family members about 10 minutes before Saturday’s attack, sources told The Post.

The 1,052-word missive obtained by The Post Sunday morning — signed ā€œCole ā€˜coldForce’ ā€˜Friendly Federal Assassin’ Allenā€ — outlined his ā€œrules of engagementā€ for the shooting and stated he believed it was his righteous duty to target administration officials."

Cole Allen’s manifesto in full:​


Exclusive | Read White House Correspondents’ Dinner gunman Cole Allen’s full anti-Trump manifesto
Without any doubt he has anti social personality disorder a psychopath with traits of narcissism, delusions of grandeur. He is very much like Eric Harris the Columbine shooter and Ted Kacinsky the unibomber. How did he not get diagnosed or was he.
 
Back
Top Bottom