Trump takes the 5th 400 times...

Ornato DID NOT deny it.

There was no way to "portray" it...she spoke, live, under oath and made it perfectly clear that she was referring to a conversation.

You must stop lying.
Where is the transcript? Why isn't it release....because it doesn't confirm the narrative...we all know this.

Secret Service officials quickly disputed the account from Hutchinson about a physical altercation.


And who cross examined Cassidy? Oh that's right this committee didn't allow any of that.....it was a kangeroo court plain and simple.
 
we know, as Trump said in his own words: only the mob or criminals or guilty people plead the 5th. Trump is guilty as fuck, so he had to plead the 5th because he had no valid legal excuse for his criminal actions. Also this disposition is under oath, so if Trump told more lies he would get another criminal charge.
Oh well, you have to prove it, something you haven't done with a 4 million charges you tried to get him on......keep trying, one of these days you'll make it stick....lolololololol
 
Where is the transcript? Why isn't it release....because it doesn't confirm the narrative...we all know this.

Secret Service officials quickly disputed the account from Hutchinson about a physical altercation.


And who cross examined Cassidy? Oh that's right this committee didn't allow any of that.....it was a kangeroo court plain and simple.
With what would she be challenged?

By whom?


You don't do much thinking, do you...
 
we know, as Trump said in his own words: only the mob or criminals or guilty people plead the 5th. Trump is guilty as fuck, so he had to plead the 5th because he had no valid legal excuse for his criminal actions. Also this disposition is under oath, so if Trump told more lies he would get another criminal charge.
/----/ Are you saying Trump was wrong when he said that, or these democRATs are criminals and mobsters? Which is it?
 
Ornato DID NOT deny it.

There was no way to "portray" it...she spoke, live, under oath and made it perfectly clear that she was referring to a conversation.

You must stop lying.
Which, if they really wanted it entered into evidence, they should have had him on the stand. She could be 100% truthful and 100% wrong at the same time. There's really no place for such hearsay when holding hearings unless you're going for hit points instead of actual justice or to get to the bottom of something.

That's just one reason why this is regarded as a classic Kangaroo Court, a Soviet style show trial, if you will.
 
Last edited:
we know, as Trump said in his own words: only the mob or criminals or guilty people plead the 5th. Trump is guilty as fuck, so he had to plead the 5th because he had no valid legal excuse for his criminal actions. Also this disposition is under oath, so if Trump told more lies he would get another criminal charge.
Oh, I see what you're doing there. You're attempting to make the case that hypocrisy is an automatic guilty verdict. Sorry, not going to fly. TRUMP! could even be guilty of wearing white after Labor Day and still be found not guilty because he refused to incriminate himself. Of course, it simply doesn't matter to the terminally simple minded what the ultimate verdict is. Orange Man Bad means guilty, no matter what. It reminds one of the Queen of Hearts in Alice in Wonderland.
 
Which, if they really wanted it entered into evidence, they should have had him on the stand. She could be 100% truthful and 100% wrong at the same time. There's really no place for such hearsay when holding hearings unless you're going for hit points instead of actual justice or to get to the bottom of something.

That's just one reason why this is regarded as a classic Kangaroo Court, a Soviet style show trial, if you will.
You confuse a commission with a legal proceeding....this suggests that you're a bit simple.

If she is testifying to something she was told, directly, it isn't "hearsay". She is testifying to something she saw or heard, first hand.

No one, outside the lunatic fringe, would describe what ACTUALLY transpired as a "Cangaroo court"....only someone being told what happened.
 
You confuse a commission with a legal proceeding....this suggests that you're a bit simple.

If she is testifying to something she was told, directly, it isn't "hearsay". She is testifying to something she saw or heard, first hand.

No one, outside the lunatic fringe, would describe what ACTUALLY transpired as a "Cangaroo court"....only someone being told what happened.
When a commission is formed to further a pre-determined narrative instead of revealing actual truth, it is not going to be taken seriously, and should not be.
 
Hey, you know the narrative. He's not allowed to use any legal protections because reasons and Orange Man Bad.

He condemned others for doing that, now he is getting it in return.
 
When a commission is formed to further a pre-determined narrative instead of revealing actual truth, it is not going to be taken seriously, and should not be.
Please don't dig further, Fluffy...

This one featured sworn testimony, nearly exclusively from Republicans....who were there....
 
translation - donny will say anything whilst 'in the moment' to either

A) make himself look bigley better than he really is

B) get out of a situation that can nail him on something disgusting/criminal/or cowardly




how original.
/----/ Are you saying Trump was wrong when he said that, or these democRATs are criminals and mobsters? Which is it? Are you afraid to answer becuase it will deflate your silly posts?
 

Forum List

Back
Top