Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
-
Then I guess that would give us an advantage with all the low life lying these worthless shit head democRats do. We do know you democRats if not to stupib could be bat shit crazy a problem that would cure it's self if food stamps were cut.President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases --There is a central flaw in the argument-- Judges have heard the cases and have been among the harshest critics of the legal arguments put forth by Trump’s legal team, often dismissing them with scathing language of repudiation. Even Trump's own hand picked judges have said there is no legal merit to Trump's (so called) evidence. Yet Trump supporters continue to bang the drum about voter fraud.
Trump supporters can't handle the truth!
Trump thought courts were key to winning. Judges disagreed.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases.apnews.com
Dogbiscuit (another poster on here) has bet me 1,000 dollars that Trump is going to get a second term. Guess on Jan 21st, I'm gonna have some nice pocket change.
It is a federal offence (against the law) to bet on the internet.
www.onlinegambling.com
Every case that has been rejected is because of technicalities and lack of standing.
-
Thanks for looking this up. I was wrongReally? Then how do you explain internet gambling?
-
How many times are you going to repeat this lie? No court has looked at the evidence.President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases --There is a central flaw in the argument-- Judges have heard the cases and have been among the harshest critics of the legal arguments put forth by Trump’s legal team, often dismissing them with scathing language of repudiation. Even Trump's own hand picked judges have said there is no legal merit to Trump's (so called) evidence. Yet Trump supporters continue to bang the drum about voter fraud.
Trump supporters can't handle the truth!
Trump thought courts were key to winning. Judges disagreed.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases.
Thanks for looking this up. I was wrongReally? Then how do you explain internet gambling?
Wrong, bozo.Every case that has been rejected is because of technicalities and lack of standing.
A lawyer you are not. The challenges to the election results were (all) rejected for lack of EVIDENCE
Trump is going to get thousands of his followers to march on the US Capitol declaring Trump won. They will clash with thousands who oppose this intrusion, and many lives will be lost during the mayhem.
While Trump smiles at the lose of lives
How many times are you going to repeat this lie? No court has looked at the evidence.President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases --There is a central flaw in the argument-- Judges have heard the cases and have been among the harshest critics of the legal arguments put forth by Trump’s legal team, often dismissing them with scathing language of repudiation. Even Trump's own hand picked judges have said there is no legal merit to Trump's (so called) evidence. Yet Trump supporters continue to bang the drum about voter fraud.
Trump supporters can't handle the truth!
Trump thought courts were key to winning. Judges disagreed.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases.
They didn't look at the evidence, turd. That is an indisputable fact.How many times are you going to repeat this lie? No court has looked at the evidence.President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases --There is a central flaw in the argument-- Judges have heard the cases and have been among the harshest critics of the legal arguments put forth by Trump’s legal team, often dismissing them with scathing language of repudiation. Even Trump's own hand picked judges have said there is no legal merit to Trump's (so called) evidence. Yet Trump supporters continue to bang the drum about voter fraud.
Trump supporters can't handle the truth!
Trump thought courts were key to winning. Judges disagreed.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases.
Really? You think that the courts don't have the resources to check the claims laid down by Trump and his supporters? Unlike you, they actually do look at evidence, and none has proven that there was fraud. Even Barr (one of Trump's loyal toadies) has said that there was zero voter fraud. Oh wait...............I'm guessing you're gonna throw him under the bus and say he lied, even though he's been firmly in Trump's corner up until the election.
They didn't look at the evidence, turd. That is an indisputable fact.How many times are you going to repeat this lie? No court has looked at the evidence.President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases --There is a central flaw in the argument-- Judges have heard the cases and have been among the harshest critics of the legal arguments put forth by Trump’s legal team, often dismissing them with scathing language of repudiation. Even Trump's own hand picked judges have said there is no legal merit to Trump's (so called) evidence. Yet Trump supporters continue to bang the drum about voter fraud.
Trump supporters can't handle the truth!
Trump thought courts were key to winning. Judges disagreed.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases.
Really? You think that the courts don't have the resources to check the claims laid down by Trump and his supporters? Unlike you, they actually do look at evidence, and none has proven that there was fraud. Even Barr (one of Trump's loyal toadies) has said that there was zero voter fraud. Oh wait...............I'm guessing you're gonna throw him under the bus and say he lied, even though he's been firmly in Trump's corner up until the election.
They didn't decide any of these cases on the evidence, moron.They didn't look at the evidence, turd. That is an indisputable fact.How many times are you going to repeat this lie? No court has looked at the evidence.President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases --There is a central flaw in the argument-- Judges have heard the cases and have been among the harshest critics of the legal arguments put forth by Trump’s legal team, often dismissing them with scathing language of repudiation. Even Trump's own hand picked judges have said there is no legal merit to Trump's (so called) evidence. Yet Trump supporters continue to bang the drum about voter fraud.
Trump supporters can't handle the truth!
Trump thought courts were key to winning. Judges disagreed.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases.
Really? You think that the courts don't have the resources to check the claims laid down by Trump and his supporters? Unlike you, they actually do look at evidence, and none has proven that there was fraud. Even Barr (one of Trump's loyal toadies) has said that there was zero voter fraud. Oh wait...............I'm guessing you're gonna throw him under the bus and say he lied, even though he's been firmly in Trump's corner up until the election.
Really? Courts don't look at the evidence? Then how in the hell do they make their decision? BTW.................your sig line looks like a condom, is that because you're a dickhead?
They didn't decide any of these cases on the evidence, moron.They didn't look at the evidence, turd. That is an indisputable fact.How many times are you going to repeat this lie? No court has looked at the evidence.President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases --There is a central flaw in the argument-- Judges have heard the cases and have been among the harshest critics of the legal arguments put forth by Trump’s legal team, often dismissing them with scathing language of repudiation. Even Trump's own hand picked judges have said there is no legal merit to Trump's (so called) evidence. Yet Trump supporters continue to bang the drum about voter fraud.
Trump supporters can't handle the truth!
Trump thought courts were key to winning. Judges disagreed.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases.
Really? You think that the courts don't have the resources to check the claims laid down by Trump and his supporters? Unlike you, they actually do look at evidence, and none has proven that there was fraud. Even Barr (one of Trump's loyal toadies) has said that there was zero voter fraud. Oh wait...............I'm guessing you're gonna throw him under the bus and say he lied, even though he's been firmly in Trump's corner up until the election.
Really? Courts don't look at the evidence? Then how in the hell do they make their decision? BTW.................your sig line looks like a condom, is that because you're a dickhead?
Sorry, Dickhead....every case was dismissed because of a pre-determined opinion. This is how a hearing lasts only 2 hours before the judge decides off-hand that the parties had no legal standing to bring suit.Every case that has been rejected is because of technicalities and lack of standing.
A lawyer you are not. The challenges to the election results were (all) rejected for lack of EVIDENCE
Hillary Clinton called Donald Trump to concede defeat in the presidential election, a Trump aide confirmed early Wednesday morning, not long after her campaign chairman signaled she would not directly address supporters or concede until later.I'm not all that concerned. Probably just the same way Democrats acted when Trump won. Investigation after investigations that accomplish nothing.
-
Uh....no....they hold a hearing first.....they then decide if the case will proceed.They didn't decide any of these cases on the evidence, moron.They didn't look at the evidence, turd. That is an indisputable fact.How many times are you going to repeat this lie? No court has looked at the evidence.President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases --There is a central flaw in the argument-- Judges have heard the cases and have been among the harshest critics of the legal arguments put forth by Trump’s legal team, often dismissing them with scathing language of repudiation. Even Trump's own hand picked judges have said there is no legal merit to Trump's (so called) evidence. Yet Trump supporters continue to bang the drum about voter fraud.
Trump supporters can't handle the truth!
Trump thought courts were key to winning. Judges disagreed.
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump and his allies say their lawsuits aimed at subverting the 2020 election and reversing his loss to Joe Biden would be substantiated, if only judges were allowed to hear the cases.
Really? You think that the courts don't have the resources to check the claims laid down by Trump and his supporters? Unlike you, they actually do look at evidence, and none has proven that there was fraud. Even Barr (one of Trump's loyal toadies) has said that there was zero voter fraud. Oh wait...............I'm guessing you're gonna throw him under the bus and say he lied, even though he's been firmly in Trump's corner up until the election.
Really? Courts don't look at the evidence? Then how in the hell do they make their decision? BTW.................your sig line looks like a condom, is that because you're a dickhead?
Guess you're kinda fuzzy on how courts operate. The get the evidence from both sides, and then decide which side is right idiot. BTW, is the reason your sig line looks like a condom because you know you're a dickhead?
Says the mofo who thought that Russian Collusion was real for 4 damned years.“Trump supporters can't handle the truth!”
Actually they can.
They handle it by ignoring it; by contriving ridiculous lies, misinformation, and conspiracy theories they attempt to advance as the ‘truth.’
