Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But he did commit a crime by organizing and approving the fake elector efforts coordinate by Trump in DC in WI and NV. And now the DAs are going after them in NV and GA and MI.Trump didn't commit a crime by suggesting that Pence should send EC votes back to the states to be recertified.
Right, then you tried to change the topic by bringing up Obama and “lock her up”, I was referencing the original topic, as I stated.The subject wasn't changed. The subject is Trump and he relation to the Jan 6 insurrection. His words.
I believe you entered at post #235 with:
So the theory is is trump, just by using rhetoric, indirectly caused his supporters to attack the capitol? And that somehow makes him guilty of causing the riot? I mean, again, show me a politician that doesn’t speak in rhetoric Should we indict the whole of Washington DC?
Trump's behavior was like no on else's. That was a Yuge part of the attraction. Trump's real and imagined grievances, appealed to primal tribalism, suspicion, and rage.
He prided himself on breaking rules, trashing norms...lacking honor, decency, civility...
In my life, the right has always been seeking to divide America. I remember Newt and his group demanding the GOP and the Dems become strictly partisan. They helped chase out most of the liberal and moderate Republicans. The Dems just about followed suit years later as the right kept up framing the battle. People like you see liberals, moderates, and all Democrats as 'the left.' It helps you with any cognitive dissonance that would crop up.
And going on 'ignore'? Is that what you strive for as if that makes you somehow into a winner? Sad and pathetic. Dante usually ignores fools. He doesn't put them on ignore. So if that is what you seek? Loser.
You are deluded as you pride yourself on somehow seeing yourself as bothering people enough to be ignored.
In my life, the right has always been seeking to divide America.
I remember Newt and his group demanding the GOP and the Dems become strictly partisan.
People like you see liberals, moderates, and all Democrats as 'the left.' It helps you with any cognitive dissonance that would crop up.
And going on 'ignore'? Is that what you strive for as if that makes you somehow into a winner? Sad and pathetic. Dante usually ignores fools. He doesn't put them on ignore. So if that is what you seek? Loser.
You are deluded as you pride yourself on somehow seeing yourself as bothering people enough to be ignored.
Cute strawman.Trump didn't commit a crime by suggesting that Pence should send EC votes back to the states to be recertified.
^^ don't feed the sealionsSo tell me, how did he appeal to that rage…
No, he was suggesting that the EC votes be sent back to the states to be recertified.Yes, the bad legal advice was to overthrow the electoral count illegally.
No, that was never a crime before. He had electors ready in case any state EC votes were overturned. Something which had been done before, but was never prosecuted as a crime.But he did commit a crime by organizing and approving the fake elector efforts coordinate by Trump in DC in WI and NV. And now the DAs are going after them in NV and GA and MI.
Lie.No, that was never a crime before.
He was suggesting that the VP should do something unconstitutional, and the VP told him to fuck off.No, he was suggesting that the EC votes be sent back to the states to be recertified.
Yes, conspiring to break the law and making false certificates are crimes.No, that was never a crime before. He had electors ready in case any state EC votes were overturned. Something which had been done before, but was never prosecuted as a crime.
^^ don't feed the sealions
So it was a bad faith question meant to waste his timelol, you caught on to my plan to get him to explain how trump somehow managed to appeal to everyone ls rage, using the same tactics that every other politician uses.
Damn you!
No, it was an honest question designed to make a pointSo it was a bad faith question meant to waste his time
Like I said.
You had a prescrb3d answer, no matter the response. Anyhoo...No, it was an honest question designed to make a point
You had a prescrb3d answer, no matter the response. Anyhoo...
You aren't going to succeed at equating Trump with others. He is clearly worse, for reasons mentioned many times
The pattern I see is your false equivalencies. As predicted.The only equating I’m doing is that just about every left winger you see on TV uses rhetoric, many in left wing media use extreme hateful rhetoric. Trump used rhetoric…seems to be a pattern there. Hmm…politicians use rhetoric..
The pattern I see is your false equivalencies. As predicted.
Do they also all drink water, and use silverware?
