Jack Smith is tossing the Election interference case against President Trump AG Bondi should bring a case against Jack Smith for election interference

[Lisa558]

I don't know where you get this.

The court filing specificfally says that it's it petitioning Judge Chutkan to dismiss the charges "without prejudice" as the dismissal equest is based on DOJ policy pertaing to sitting Presidents and NOT the merits of the cases. (Both DC election interference and Espionage documents case.)

WW
.
.


View attachment 1046822

Yup….and Trump was a sitting president, and Smith charged him anyway with a fake case to hurt his election chances. The case was dismissed because it never should have been brought at all.

OTOH, what Smith did was not as president, since he never was president. He is liable for malicious prosecution and election interference.

 

[Delldude]

Which ones?

He's well known for taking the law and applying it under his own interpretations and loses quite a few doing that. I think his track record is on Wiki.

 

[BackAgain]

Nobody will prosecute Smith.

And as reprehensible as he is and his conduct has been, nobody should. He has (and even a prick like him should have) prosecutorial immunity.

 

[rightwinger]

He's well known for taking the law and applying it under his own interpretations and loses quite a few doing that. I think his track record is on Wiki.

Give some examples

 

[WorldWatcher]

He better be gone before J 20.

Think he will?

"J 20" has nothing to do with it.

It's getting an indictment from a Grand Jury and the court issuing an arrest order.

That ain't happening on "J 20".

[And honestly never will despite all the chest thumping. He's not going to be charged for doing his job in attempting to prosecute a criminal.]

WW

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I know it is tempting for those who have done so much evil to receive their comeuppance. There's a part of me that wants that too. But I also understand that if government weaponization against opposition is to be stopped, it has to stop with somebody. I think he has chosen for it to stop with him. And I hope there are plans to codify it into law to make it far more difficult for any future administration to do it.

The marxists tore into George Bush 43 even when George pretty much did everything the Marxists wanted, because the establishment Republicans allowed the Democrats to do it. Then the brown turd Obammy weaponized the IRS to go after conservatives and the establishment Republicans let him do it. Joe Bribem weaponized the DOJ, if we dont punish the Marxists with extreme Justice, for the crimes they have committed, they will continue to do the crimes. Force is the only way the Marxists will either leave the country or be in jail for a very long time.

 

[Delldude]

Give some examples

I did.

 

[Delldude]

"J 20" has nothing to do with it.

It's getting an indictment from a Grand Jury and the court issuing an arrest order.

That ain't happening on "J 20".

[And honestly never will despite all the chest thumping. He's not going to be charged for doing his job in attempting to prosecute a criminal.]

WW

He'll skip town.

 

[hadit]

AG Bondi should bring a case against Jack Smith for election interference​

If Jack Smith runs for President, those charges will be dropped

TRUMP! has no interest in seeking revenge. Nothing will happen to him.

 

[Delldude]

TRUMP! has no interest in seeking revenge. Nothing will happen to him.

Trump said He's fired first thing.

 

[WorldWatcher]

He'll skip town.

Skip down on what?

When was Special Counsel Smith indicted?

WW

 

[Delldude]

Skip down on what?

When was Special Counsel Smith indicted?

WW

He'll probably go beck to where he was before being selected, unconstitutionally, as special council.

 

[WorldWatcher]

He'll probably go beck to where he was before being selected, unconstitutionally, as special council.

His job as Special Counsel was perfectly constitutional. Congress wrote the laws authoritizing the AG to hire such positoins. The same statutes used by DEM and GOP administrations (including Trump) for the last 50 years.

Because he appointed a Judge that is on his short list for DC appointments and she dismissed the charges for a made up reason on the day the GOP Conventions started goes to show she was in his pocket, not that the appointment was unconstitutional.

Subordinate officers, according to the Constitution do not need Senate confirmation as long as Congress authorized their hiring. Which Congress did when it wrote the laws in the United States Code.

WW

 

[Delldude]

His job as Special Counsel was perfectly constitutional. Congress wrote the laws authoritizing the AG to hire such positoins. The same statutes used by DEM and GOP administrations (including Trump) for the last 50 years.

Because he appointed a Judge that is on his short list for DC appointments and she dismissed the charges for a made up reason on the day the GOP Conventions started goes to show she was in his pocket, not that the appointment was unconstitutional.

Subordinate officers, according to the Constitution do not need Senate confirmation as long as Congress authorized their hiring. Which Congress did when it wrote the laws in the United States Code.

WW

Meh..........Ed Meese and others see it quite different.

You missed the boat..............each individual has to be approved by congress............which never happened in this case.

 

[Foxfyre]

The marxists tore into George Bush 43 even when George pretty much did everything the Marxists wanted, because the establishment Republicans allowed the Democrats to do it. Then the brown turd Obammy weaponized the IRS to go after conservatives and the establishment Republicans let him do it. Joe Bribem weaponized the DOJ, if we dont punish the Marxists with extreme Justice, for the crimes they have committed, they will continue to do the crimes. Force is the only way the Marxists will either leave the country or be in jail for a very long time.

The best punishment is to keep them out of power. To use the government to punish them will require millions and millions of dollars to investigate and indict and convict them with no guarantee a conviction will be achieved. And it just keeps the pattern going as 'us' doing it to 'them' will be used as justification for 'them' to do it to 'us' if they should regain the House and/or Senate and/or White House.

I prefer Trump's position on this. Yes expose them for what they are. Educate the public as to the destructive policies and initiatives they have engaged in. Embarrass and humiliate them as is justified. The majority of Americans do know how the government has been corrupt and engaged in bad acts against political opponents. But stop the lawfare and weaponization of government. Don't do it any more.

 

[Foxfyre]

It isnt weaponizing the government to go after REAL criminals that followed Stalin like Lawfare. Bring justice to those that did the wrong, give them 30 years to life, and see if they want to continue playing the game that Democrats always do.

The leftists all said they were going after REAL criminals in going after Trump and others who supported him. Most Americans didn't buy it. But if we now go after them, that will most likely be the perception, i.e. we are going after political opponents instead of real lawbreakers.

Perhaps there were crimes committed that must be addressed. I don't know. But to those who wanted to fight their Russian oppressors and said "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth!" Tevye responded: "Oh good, that way the world with be blind and toothless."

Somehow, some way we have to stop it. And now may be the time.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The best punishment is to keep them out of power. To use the government to punish them will require millions and millions of dollars to investigate and indict and convict them with no guarantee a conviction will be achieved. And it just keeps the pattern going as 'us' doing it to 'them' will be used as justification for 'them' to do it to 'us' if they should regain the House and/or Senate and/or White House.

I prefer Trump's position on this. Yes expose them for what they are. Educate the public as to the destructive policies and initiatives they have engaged in. Embarrass and humiliate them as is justified. The majority of Americans do know how the government has been corrupt and engaged in bad acts against political opponents. But stop the lawfare and weaponization of government. Don't do it any more.

No, that isnt the best punishment, remember how cities burned, because the Marxists lost power, then kept the federal government from responding? Yeah, keep being passive, and the Marxists take it as a sign of weakness and all hell breaks loose.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The leftists all said they were going after REAL criminals in going after Trump and others who supported him. Most Americans didn't buy it. But if we now go after them, that will most likely be the perception, i.e. we are going after political opponents instead of real lawbreakers.

Perhaps there were crimes committed that must be addressed. I don't know. But to those who wanted to fight their Russian oppressors and said "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth!" Tevye responded: "Oh good, that way the world with be blind and toothless."

Somehow, some way we have to stop it. And now may be the time.

Criminals need to be arrested for the crimes they commit. There is video evidence showing the crime, not edited but real.

 

[Mister Iggy]

I bet they are planning on it, a case for election interference. Hopefully they can look at the E Jean Carrol case too as that was a strange one..

 

[Foxfyre]

No, that isnt the best punishment, remember how cities burned, because the Marxists lost power, then kept the federal government from responding? Yeah, keep being passive, and the Marxists take it as a sign of weakness and all hell breaks loose.

We'll see. I certainly don't claim any kind of crystal ball. I just know that vengeance or what appears to be vengeance can result in endless hostility. I think it is most likely time to try something else.