No, I dont. I more or less understand what the explanation will be. It is your point of view, that is okay. From my point, I think if you wont defend Estonia, you will end up with Russia near the German border. It will be the matter of time.What can you say about Denmark? If the Soviets had attacked Copenhagen, would it be reasonable to defend it?Why? Because Estonia is some hundred miles farther from Washington?The Soviets taking West Germany was a threat to US.
The Russians taking Estonia, is not
Nope. Because estonia is a very small nation and West Germany was a large nation AND closer to France.
Taking West Germany would have put the Soviet Union is a position to dominate the world.
Taking Estonia does nothing to threaten the US.
It is bad policy that we are committed to defend them.
Yes. Do you need me to explain why?
My point stands. Being Treaty Bound to defend Estonia at the cost of WWIII,
is bad policy.
Russia taking Estonian does not mean that they will attack Poland.