trump refuses to call for unity in FOX interview

[RedrickTheCoat]

I do.

I do not see anything extreme in calling out the left for their actions.

The problem with that sentiment is classing the actions of a single person as being the entire party and voter base? If we start doing that, then do you really want to get into a debate about which party affliation is more common in mass shootings?

What about calling out the right for the recent Minnesota legislator killing?

What actions from the left do you want to call out specifically?

 

[JimH52]

You can't unite with people that want to kill you.

Yeah like Minnesota, Pelosi's husband and the Penn governor. trump is a cancer on democracy.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Samsung News

www.samsung-news.com

Trump’s refusal to seek a common bipartisan way forward at a time of profound national anger, fear and mourning was a stunning move for a sitting US president, even by his standards.

Trump has never been a unifier. He loves division, even among his staff. He finds delight in seeing people tear each other apart. This is typical of a narcissistic bully. He will delight if a Dem is murdered, just like he sat and enjoyed the mob on J6 that he helped pay for.

Trump is contributing to the continuation of violence.

 

[Monoculturalist]

Yeah like Minnesota, Pelosi's husband and the Penn governor. trump is a cancer on democracy.

When you mention Minnesota, you should keep in mind that a tranny killed some Christian kids. There's political violence on both sides, but the difference is that the right doesn't usually celebrate when someone on its side kills someone on the left.

 

[JimH52]

Trump is contributing to the continuation of violence.

He knows it and he is happy doing it. the first president in US history that is encouraging violence among citizens.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Seymour Flops]

The problem with that sentiment is classing the actions of a single person as being the entire party and voter base? If we start doing that, then do you really want to get into a debate about which party affliation is more common in mass shootings?

What about calling out the right for the recent Minnesota legislator killing?

What actions from the left do you want to call out specifically?

Let's start with the accusations that you described as "extreme." Not the acts, but the accusations.

JohnDB:

Now you have actively tried to corrupt our children with perversion, then you spilled so much blood of innocents that it's literally a river.

I posted a news story about teachers telling their students that if they were MAGA, they could just "go home and cry" over Charlie Kirk, and that they hoped that Charlie Kirk's family, children, future grandchildren and all their generations would die.

That is extreme corruption of our children, and it is only the most recent of many acts of corruption. It is not extreme to say so.

Your little Democrat operative in Minnesota only acted like he was on the right...when there's more proof he was one of you.

I don't know much about this shooter. According to the DOJ, he was targetting public officials. Most elected officials in Minnesota are Democrats, especially the more powerful lawmakers.

I certainly don't remember anyone on the right proclaiming that the Dems had brought this tragedy on themselves. If they did, show me and I will condemn those proclaimations.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[JohnDB]

Let's start with the accusations that you described as "extreme." Not the acts, but the accusations.

JohnDB:


I posted a news story about teachers telling their students that if they were MAGA, they could just "go home and cry" over Charlie Kirk, and that they hoped that Charlie Kirk's family, children, future grandchildren and all their generations would die.

That is extreme corruption of our children, and it is only the most recent of many acts of corruption. It is not extreme to say so.


I don't know much about this shooter. According to the DOJ, he was targetting public officials. Most elected officials in Minnesota are Democrats, especially the more powerful lawmakers.

I certainly don't remember anyone on the right proclaiming that the Dems had brought this tragedy on themselves. If they did, show me and I will condemn those proclaimations.

Read this in its entirety.....then talk to me.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[RedrickTheCoat]

Let's start with the accusations that you described as "extreme." Not the acts, but the accusations.

JohnDB:


I posted a news story about teachers telling their students that if they were MAGA, they could just "go home and cry" over Charlie Kirk, and that they hoped that Charlie Kirk's family, children, future grandchildren and all their generations would die.

That is extreme corruption of our children, and it is only the most recent of many acts of corruption. It is not extreme to say so.


I don't know much about this shooter. According to the DOJ, he was targetting public officials. Most elected officials in Minnesota are Democrats, especially the more powerful lawmakers.

I certainly don't remember anyone on the right proclaiming that the Dems had brought this tragedy on themselves. If they did, show me and I will condemn those proclaimations.

Let's start with the accusations that you described as "extreme." Not the acts, but the accusations.

JohnDB:


I posted a news story about teachers telling their students that if they were MAGA, they could just "go home and cry" over Charlie Kirk, and that they hoped that Charlie Kirk's family, children, future grandchildren and all their generations would die.

That is extreme corruption of our children, and it is only the most recent of many acts of corruption. It is not extreme to say so.


I don't know much about this shooter. According to the DOJ, he was targetting public officials. Most elected officials in Minnesota are Democrats, especially the more powerful lawmakers.

I certainly don't remember anyone on the right proclaiming that the Dems had brought this tragedy on themselves. If they did, show me and I will condemn those proclaimations.

That poster also said the following:
___________
"You can't have peace while your enemy is still seeking your death and those who who believe in what you are doing....

And Democrats have been seeking republican and Christian deaths....every thing they have legislated or blocked has been a systematic means to wipe out Christians and Republicans.

There can no longer be a peaceful coexistence between the two.....and that's a shame. Republicans and especially Christians did not start the war (we hate war) but we definitely know how to finish it. "
____________

And you even left out the other statement in the comment you were referencing which was:
______________
"So now, we have become active...not because we want to but because we have to. We feel the need to protect our wives and children from YOU. We hate war but when we are being slaughtered like sheep we feel the need....the Democrats celebrating Charlie's murder only secures our feelings we are on the right path. "
_____________

You guys are heavily suggesting that you want a civil war, and that's not extreme to you?
I posted a news story about teachers telling their students that if they were MAGA, they could just "go home and cry" over Charlie Kirk, and that they hoped that Charlie Kirk's family, children, future grandchildren and all their generations would die.

Ancedotal evidence, and again, this is obviously not something that is happening on a major scale. Can you understand how insane it is for a teacher to say something like that to students? Honestly, it seems so unrealistic to think that even happened. The teachers said to their students that if they are MAGA they can go home and cry over Charlie Kirk, and that they (the teacher -- or is teachers? Multiple teachers said this?) hope that Charlie's entire blood line is wiped out? And you think this is something that generally the left agrees with?


I certainly don't remember anyone on the right proclaiming that the Dems had brought this tragedy on themselves. If they did, show me and I will condemn those proclaimations.

I never said they did. But the large majority of the left are not proclaiming that republicans bought this on themselves. But at the same time, when Pelosi's husband was attacked, people on the right did mock it. People are just stupid, and it isn't confied to one party.

My honest viewpoint is that republican voters largely don't know how to use basic reasoning and logic, and you're not helping counter this viewpoint.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Read this in its entirety.....then talk to me.

A good read.

I was especially struck by the "carcerel society" comment. I only heard that term very recently, and it is the latest effort by the left to show that their vocabulary is better than ours, and that we are part of an evil culture that must be changed - by any means necessary.

My guess is that the mainstream media is fully aware of the danger to the left posited in that rant. They will do whatever they can to mitigate it, starting with blaming the gun, of course.

Your thoughts?

 

[JohnDB]

A good read.

I was especially struck by the "carcerel society" comment. I only heard that term very recently, and it is the latest effort by the left to show that their vocabulary is better than ours, and that we are part of an evil culture that must be changed - by any means necessary.

My guess is that the mainstream media is fully aware of the danger to the left posited in that rant. They will do whatever they can to mitigate it, starting with blaming the gun, of course.

Your thoughts?

They most certainly are not taking any responsibility for their rhetoric but are freely handing out false accusations at the same time.

 

[JohnDB]

 

[JohnDB]

 

[JohnDB]

 

[JimH52]

They did not spew lies. They reported Kirk's exact words.

 

[JimH52]

If you cannot see what a Poootin Stooge is by now, you are a blind Magat.

 

[White 6]

Come on, White...that narrative was stale long ago. Nobody is killing off elections. The Democrat Party is killing themselves because they've veered so far to the left they've lost large parts of their core voters. Blue collar union workers are voting for Republicans. Did you ever think you'd see THAT in your life time?

They sure haven't come up with any candidate to impress anybody. I don't think, they have figured out, some of their positions on social issues, need to be cut loose, also. I do have to agree from a constitutional standpoint, it is wrong for the president to put troops on the street when there is no emergency, insurrection, or invasion. But, right now, Republicans want to be the central control police state party, getting people used to seeing it, though mostly just picking up trash on streets and in parks. Also, makes me glad, I retired from Guard, shortly after my last active duty, years ago. That is no reason to bring them into a city, for the city or for the Guardsmen. Plus, the Dems do not support carving up Ukraine and giving it to Russia to achieve peace, just because the dumb ass dumbass war criminal Putin cannot make headway in his criminally illegal invasion. And, I am truly not impressed with the future based on Donny's tariff based economic policy. You really cannot tax your way into prosperity, but that is just a conservative view point, and the Conservatives have been primaried out of office.

 

[Nostra]

Samsung News

www.samsung-news.com

Trump’s refusal to seek a common bipartisan way forward at a time of profound national anger, fear and mourning was a stunning move for a sitting US president, even by his standards.

Trump has never been a unifier. He loves division, even among his staff. He finds delight in seeing people tear each other apart. This is typical of a narcissistic bully. He will delight if a Dem is murdered, just like he sat and enjoyed the mob on J6 that he helped pay for.

Your side is full of lunatics.

Thats why America has rejected your Cult.