ChristisKing
Christ Follower and Truth Seeker
- Thread starter
- #161
First, let me thank you for engaging with the premise. I'm aware it puts you in an uncomfortable spot and that deserves respect.
It also leads me to believe that my assessment of you is correct, not as a criticism, but in the sense that you are an honest person who truly believes what they say. I value that.
So let me answer your question honestly.
You can't know.
There's a reason courts require proof beyond reasonable doubt. Absolute certainty is nearly unachievable, you can find ways to doubt almost any evidence. You could say the five witnesses all lied, and that the burglar was just trying to sound tough. A defense lawyer's entire job is essentially that. So the standard used is whether that doubt is reasonable. If it isn't, you convict.
Which brings me to why your answer is so telling. You'd convict a stranger and send him to jail on this level of evidence, yet that same evidence isn't enough for you to judge Trump.
The question worth sitting with isn't what I think of Trump. It's whether you're applying the same standard to him that you'd apply to anyone else, and if not, whether you can honestly justify that.
I think you already know the answer.
I never said that if I was on the jury I wouldn't convict Trump based upon the evidence I've seen and heard, I just said that I don't want to personally get involved because all of the he said she said stuff is difficult for me to follow.
Yeah, we as a nation did fight for a country where we can worship God, but there's only one problem. Trump appears to hate God and worships Allah. Even if the second part was just words, Trump definitely isn't a Christian.
