How about making those arguments in your own words right here, right now?
If you can.
And who the **** are you?
I already detailed my problem with the current state of affairs.
PURGE the voter roles.
Ballots MUST be requested in person with an ID or by mail with signatures being compared.
Once ballots are submitted further signature checks must be done and the name crossed off as having voted.
And even with all these safeguards I am still 100% against mass mail in voting. Period
FIrst, i'm the one you're trying to convince (unless you forgot)
And purging the voting rolls is the easiest way to disenfranchise older voters. The current rolls have the voting history of people going back decades, if you purge that information, you suddenly have to re-register every voter.
We saw how states handled unemployment claims, what would happen when many times that many people apply for voter registration?
I recall Florida creating a bullshit felons list which excluded almost all Hispanics. Another time they tried that, their list was so flawed because it included non-felons, that many counties ignored the list entirely.
That was the leftwing propaganda, not fact.
Are you ever not a ******* moron?
Ever??
Florida election officials are using flawed method to come up with list of people believed to be convicted felons, and they are recommending that it be used to purge voter registration rolls; only 61 of nearly 48,000 Florida residents on felon list are Hispanics, but over 22,000 are...
www.nytimes.com
Everyone on the list is given an opportunity to demonstrate otherwise. You have to prove that the method used to produce the list is intentionally biased, and you haven't done that.
******* moron, the list excluded almost every Hispanic felon in the state. Why would someone wrongly not on that list have to demonstrate anything?
Are you ever not a ******* moron?
Ever???
Apparently you believe "******* moron" is a greeting.
I was living in Florida at the time. I recall the controversy over the lists. As I recall, the state revised the lists several times because of complaints, so this one single list is meaningless.
The courts require states to purge ineligible voters from their voter roles. They require some means of identifying voters who aren't eligible. No method is going to be perfect, which makes the process subject to demagoging by douchebags like you.
******* moron, this shows how easily a state disenfranchises legitimate voters. And the only reason they were forced to scrap that list, after paying millions of dollars for it -- is because they were caught. And they tried the same shit on 2000 when nearly a third of the counties refused to use the state's list because it was so fraught with errors.
See, you do use "******* moron" as a greeting.
How do you propose they purge their voter roles?
By SS#
How do they determine someone is a felon purely by SSN?
******* moron, felons have a SS#
******* moron, that's not what he asked.
Dumbfuck, it's was a ******* moronic question in response to what I said. He asked me how I propose they purge their voter roles [of felons]. I suggested they use SS# (as opposed to race and ethnicity as they have done). Somehow, his deformed brain translated that into using SS# to identify they're felons, which was never proposed; as opposed to using their SS# to identify who they are. The state already knows who their felons are. The state just needs to correctly identify them canvassing boards to have them removed from their rolls.
His brain works backwards -- so of course, his question was ass backwards.
Savvy?
"I answered a question he didn't ask because his question was stupid! How DARE you think it was because I didn't understand the question?!"
If Bri didn't already ask this question, I will: what's your evidence for your assertion that "they have purged them by race and ethnicity"? Because I KNOW even your undeserved ego realizes that the fact that you say something makes us LESS likely to believe it, not more.
Let's review the conversation that you say demonstrates that Bri's brain is "deformed" because it came up with a question that you, in your infinitesimal wisdom, could not POSSIBLY understand him asking, shall we? (And I'm cutting and pasting from your own post.)
He asked me how I propose they purge their voter roles [of felons].
I suggested they use SS#
If you can't see how that would lead to him asking how they use SS#s to identify felons, then YOUR brain is the one that's deformed (not that we didn't already know that). And then you followed that up by "helpfully" explaining that felons have Social Security numbers. Bri isn't a leftist, so he doesn't require explanations of painfully obvious things.
Oh, and you'll need to be orders of magnitude cooler than you are on your best day to pull off quoting Jack Sparrow, so give it up.
