Trump prepares EO to close down the unconstitutional federal department of education

It does, an insight that you don't gronk.
No it doesn't. Personal anecdotes rarely do.

How exactly does stripper girl's experience address the failure of the DoE to make public education better? How does it address the fact that the Government taking over the student loans for college has dont little other than skyrocket the price of higher education? Moonglow being able to shake her ass to pay for her college degree is if anything an indictment on the system. Why didn't the degree pay for it?
 
So the options are to either trash the whole thing or to modify and interpret as necessary. I’ll go with the latter. Birthright citizenship should not be a thing in the 21st century in the US. It really shouldn’t have been a thing for much of the 20th century. We are past due revisiting the subject.

Then, go for it. Change the Constitution.

Trump wants to ignore all parts of the Constitution he deems in the way, that's dangerous.
 
It has lower interest rates on student loans than private student loans.
I'm still waiting for you to post, where in the Constitution has Congress been granted a power to tax and spend for State public school systems? I find no such authorization beneath Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, for which Congress is granted power to lay and collect taxes.
 
You are talking goofy. No one really cares about globalism than about thirteen people.
I'm still waiting for you to post, where in the Constitution has Congress been granted a power to tax and spend for State public school systems? I find no such authorization beneath Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, for which Congress is granted power to lay and collect taxes.
 
"Ninety percent of federal spending is unconstitutional." - The late Walter Williams, economics professor at George Mason University

Finally someone is working to correct this catastrophe and Democrats are all deranged after just one month of wisdom in federal leadership. They haven't seen it since Ronald Reagan was president, and of course they hated him too. Evil is like that.
 



The truth is, there is no provision listed beneath Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, [Congress’s power to lay and collect taxes] allowing for a federal “Department of Education”


In fact, prior to the adoption of our existing Constitution, the People of Maryland delegated the power for a state funded and regulated educational system to their state elected officials, and not to a national governing power --- the wording being as follows:



“The General Assembly, at its First Session after the adoption of this Constitution, shall by Law establish throughout the State a thorough and efficient System of Free Public Schools; and shall provide by taxation, or otherwise, for their maintenance.”


The Maryland Constitutional also states, in emphatic terms:

“the People of this State have the sole and exclusive right of regulating the internal government and police thereof, as a free, sovereign and independent State.”


In fact, under Art. 3 of Maryland’s Constitution, the command is for local regulation and funding of education as opposed to a federally funded and regulated public school system!

The Maryland Constitution also states:


“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution thereof, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people thereof.”

This very provision of Maryland’s Declaration of Rights is also agreed to by the People of the United States by their ratification of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States!

Now, with respect to our federal Constitution and its delegated powers, upon researching the record of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, we find Delegate Charles Pickney, on August 18th, proposed a broad power "To establish seminaries for the promotion of literature and the arts and sciences", but this proposal was rejected by the Convention in favor of a limited grant of power expressed in Article 1, Section 8, Cl.8, of the proposed constitution. The limited power, later agreed upon by ratification of our Constitution authorizes Congress "[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts” and what is authorized to accomplish this? by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."

The fact is, the federal Department of Education and its current functions are in defiance of the defined and limited powers granted to Congress. And every time a member of Congress votes to fund this agency they are committing a fraud upon the people of the United States and are usurping a power not granted!

So, why are members of Congress funding this rouge agency?
The Constitution doesn’t lay out all the possibilities of what you can do. That would be ridiculous and have required the Founders to be able to see the future. What is unconstitutional would be the executive stepping on the prerogatives of the legislature.
 
I'm still waiting for you to post, where in the Constitution has Congress been granted a power to tax and spend for State public school systems? I find no such authorization beneath Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, for which Congress is granted power to lay and collect taxes.
You are not a constitutional expert, so who cares?
 
Can you explain how sending money to DC, funding the DOE which then allocates some portion of that money back to the States is a cost savings? Has the public education system produced better or worse results since the creation of the DOE under Carter?

I'm going to be completely honest. I'm too tired to fight or answer any difficult questions. It really doesn't matter what I think. Why argue with me? I don't control the Senate or House, White House or Supreme Court. Rig elections, change the tax code, cut, raise taxes, end social security, don't, I don't not care. I will survive.

I'm staying at my brothers condo in Fort Lauderdale all February. Riding up and down the A1A on my ebike yesterday I blended in with the rich and fabulous. I'm a well dressed mid 50's guy on an expensive Ebike, so I blend right in with the well off. So I don't have to be able to afford a condo in Florida. I know someone who has a condo in Florida and they don't use it Jan, Feb and March so I stay when they don't. Yesterday I rode around so envious of the people who own condos right on the water, on on the intercoastal. Have you ever been to Fort Lauderdale? Freakin Amazing.

Hey, I hope you guys triple my stocks. Then I'll forgive the cuts to my social security and medicare. Good luck! I have no say till 2026 midterms.
 
I'm going to be completely honest. I'm too tired to fight or answer any difficult questions. It really doesn't matter what I think. Why argue with me? I don't control the Senate or House, White House or Supreme Court. Rig elections, change the tax code, cut, raise taxes, end social security, don't, I don't not care. I will survive.

In other words you dont have an explanation and your only objection to anything that's happening is who's doing it. Hint that's not a good reason to hold a position.
I'm staying at my brothers condo in Fort Lauderdale all February. Riding up and down the A1A on my ebike yesterday I blended in with the rich and fabulous. I'm a well dressed mid 50's guy on an expensive Ebike, so I blend right in with the well off. So I don't have to be able to afford a condo in Florida. I know someone who has a condo in Florida and they don't use it Jan, Feb and March so I stay when they don't. Yesterday I rode around so envious of the people who own condos right on the water, on on the intercoastal. Have you ever been to Fort Lauderdale? Freakin Amazing.

Hey, I hope you guys triple my stocks. Then I'll forgive the cuts to my social security and medicare. Good luck! I have no say till 2026 midterms.

Cool story. No one cares.
 
In other words you dont have an explanation and your only objection to anything that's happening is who's doing it. Hint that's not a good reason to hold a position.


Cool story. No one cares.
Sure, they do. But what you think, Trumpmunchkin, matters not.
 
You are not a constitutional expert, so who cares?
I'm still waiting for you to post, where in the Constitution has Congress been granted a power to tax and spend for State public school systems? I find no such authorization beneath Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, for which Congress is granted power to lay and collect taxes.
 
The Constitution doesn’t lay out all the possibilities of what you can do. That would be ridiculous and have required the Founders to be able to see the future.

The Constitution lays out defined and limited powers. Where in the Constitution has Congress been granted a power to tax and spend for State public school systems? I find no such authorization beneath Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, for which Congress is granted power to lay and collect taxes.
 
The Constitution doesn’t lay out all the possibilities of what you can do. That would be ridiculous and have required the Founders to be able to see the future. What is unconstitutional would be the executive stepping on the prerogatives of the legislature.
The Constitution says that that which is not specifically assigned to the federal government belongs with the states.

And that was done because our Founding Fathers, in their brilliance, foresaw power-hungry people such as today’s “progressives” trying to centralize power in the federal government and grabbing massive power for the people at the top.
 
The Constitution says that that which is not specifically assigned to the federal government belongs with the states.

And that was done because our Founding Fathers, in their brilliance, foresaw power-hungry people such as today’s “progressives” trying to centralize power in the federal government and grabbing massive power for the people at the top.
Many of the founding fathers were federalists.
 
johnwk

Slow horses obviously is a product of the DOE-run public school system, and shows us why the progressive left should not be allowed to indoctrinate our children.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom