Trump loses again.

those that seek asylum go thru a process & are weeded out at the start. the rest are deported. those temps are allowed in & stay for far too long but that has been the laws on the books for far longer than dark brandon's term. or obama's. guess who voted against immigration reform just a short while ago that would have put more immigration judges & adjudication officers right there AT THE BORDER. not to mention more border control officers.



uh-huh. things coulda & woulda started changing, but yer chosen one didn't want to give biden a win. & i ain't a (D), you MAGAt.
Xiden’s process was to ignore the law and allow them all in give them tps or release them on bond and tell them to come back whenever

Trump deports them using the law and secured the border

How much are border crossings down?
 
They didn’t rule that he can’t continue to enforce the law

What they did say is that in that one case they needed to give the deported illegal a little more time to have a chance to file a petention

See the issue here is that yoj have not actually read the opinions and simply repeat what folks like Jack trapper tell you they say

This is why you’ve been made a fool on this thread

Interesting claim that I haven't read the decision when the order of 05/16/2025 says what I said it said. Which was the the Trump Administration is enjoined from any further deportations under the AEA, I never they couldn't deport people using other legal means.

Yet here you claim: "that in that one case they needed to give the deported illegal a little more time to have a chance to file a petention"

And yet in the order that I was using as the basis of my claim the court said:

1747512490307.webp


Not only the one person as you claim, the administration is enjoined from further action against the "putative class members". That is all those held for AEA removal.

So you claim I didn't read it, yet I'm posting from it showing your "reading" of it is incorrect.

WW

 
Which court rulings did Biden ignore?
Specifics please. You shouldn't just throw baseless shit out there with nothing to back it up.
Every order not to grant student loan forgiveness... the only thing who stopped that was that he ran out of time... but don't kid yourself he ignored them continually...
 
Every order not to grant student loan forgiveness... the only thing who stopped that was that he ran out of time... but don't kid yourself he ignored them continually...

Biden honored all the court orders. There is the one that went to SCOTUS and the SCOTUS narrowly ruled about his use of the HEROS Act.

He stopped using the HEROS Act.

The SCOTUS DID NOT say there were not other methods authorized by Congress. Such as PSLF (Public Service Loan Forgiveness) which the Congress did authorize.

WW
 
Biden honored all the court orders. There is the one that went to SCOTUS and the SCOTUS narrowly ruled about his use of the HEROS Act.

He stopped using the HEROS Act.

The SCOTUS DID NOT say there were not other methods authorized by Congress. Such as PSLF (Public Service Loan Forgiveness) which the Congress did authorize.

WW
Dude he did not... the media is lying if that's what they told you....
 
Every order not to grant student loan forgiveness... the only thing who stopped that was that he ran out of time... but don't kid yourself he ignored them continually...
You are forgetting that the Biden admin ultimately complied with the court orders and the loan forgiveness initiatives were shut down.
And NOT ONCE did we see Joe Biden whining on Twitter about those "mean, nasty, judicial activist" judges.
You lose Simp.
Try again.
 
Nope. Lookup the SCOTUS ruling, it applied ONLY to his use of the HEROS act.

The SCOTUS never enjoined him from not forgiving any student loans under other processes authorized by Congress.

The right wing is lying if to you if you think that the SCOTUS ruled other than what I explained.

Here is the ruling.

WW

Rambi boi is incapable of accessing information that does not conform to his cultish, brainwashed, world view.
 
You have no knowledge of what people are coming to your border, you simply make assumptions.

...
But some wrinkly old busybody huddled in an igloo thousands of miles away from that border does? Get over yourself, you nosy old broad.
 
There are 20,000,000 or more Illegal Aliens now on US Soil.

They need to go.

If that means executing pro forma "due process" on a tremendously expedited basis, that would be fine.

That’s not cost-effective or feasible. You started doing this in the 1980’s and 40 years later you have 11 milllion undocumented residents. What you’ve been doing isn’t working and it hasn’t been working since Reagan was in office.

Time to do something different. Trampling the constitution and throwing out anybody who isn’t white isn’t any kind of solution.

Neither is reconstituting apartheid South Africa with your white nationalism.
But some wrinkly old busybody huddled in an igloo thousands of miles away from that border does? Get over yourself, you nosy old broad.

I give you facts, figures, links, reports and data. You give me brainless insults.

Nothing to get over for me. It's not my country Trump is burning to the ground.
 
Interesting claim that I haven't read the decision when the order of 05/16/2025 says what I said it said. Which was the the Trump Administration is enjoined from any further deportations under the AEA, I never they couldn't deport people using other legal means.

Yet here you claim: "that in that one case they needed to give the deported illegal a little more time to have a chance to file a petention"

And yet in the order that I was using as the basis of my claim the court said:

View attachment 1112445

Not only the one person as you claim, the administration is enjoined from further action against the "putative class members". That is all those held for AEA removal.

So you claim I didn't read it, yet I'm posting from it showing your "reading" of it is incorrect.

WW

They did not rule that thr act is being illegally used
 
They did not rule that thr act is being illegally used

I didn’t say the SCOTUS did.

I said they put an injunction on its use.

So did they enjoin action for just the individual as you claimed or for the classes ID in the proclamation?

WW
 
It’s about societal decay and degradation caused by undesirable illiterate parasites from our south. You can call such a scary truth racism…I embrace that word like all sane people do.

The people who embrace the word aren’t “sane” at all. They’re irrational, tribal, and not particularly bright.

Racism is the tool the oligarchs use to keep poor white people and poor black people from forming a voting block which votes for fair wages ang workers’ rights.

It’s the same tool the slave owners used to keep the slaves and the sharecroppers from teaming up and taking over the plantation before there was law and order.
 
Under Biden a simple declaration requesting asylum was enough without any supporting evidence to grant temporary asylum while the applicant was released to disappear into American society never to surface again.
Border Agents had specific criteria in their preliminary vetting for asylum. Our loose as a goose congressional immigration laws allow the executive to determine such.

The main reason our border policy does not work, is the back up in the immigration courts that is hitting a 5 year wait time....so seekers have to be released and not detained in a cell till their court hearing.

If we would just expand and fund our immigration courts to where a qualified asylum seeker has their court date within 2 to 3 weeks, we could detain them until their hearing, never let them loose until a judge determine their fate of acceptance, and if denied, deported straight from detention back to their country.

When they arrive back home, 3 weeks after they arrived in the US, this word would get around, and discourage their fellow countrymen from making the long trip, to only be sent back immediately.... Vs. having 5 years to disappear before their court date.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom