Tell us about the freeloaders that won't do a damn thing to even provide the basics of life to themselves demanding someone else pay more taxes so they can continue to be the pieces of shit they've chosen to be.
Someone not willing to do even the basics for themselves should go without.
Yes, Yes. We all know how you like to rail against the people who are poor, because, and only because of their laziness and lack of good moral character. However, that does not have a damned think to do with Trumps tax proposal. What he is put on the table is a plan that will not only hurt the poor -many of who do work- but also the middle income folks . It is nothing more than a smokescreen for a big giveaway to the wealthy.
And consider this:
This tax cut isn’t for the middle class, which only pays 2.5% now
Today, most Americans aren’t clamoring for lower taxes, probably because most of us don’t pay very much in federal income taxes. Our tax burden has rarely been lower. The latest data show that the 60% of families in the middle of the income distribution — those between about $32,000 and about $140,000 — pay an average of just 2.5% of their income in federal income taxes.
And this:
Nearly half of Americans owe no federal income tax at all, but they do pay taxes: payroll taxes to fund Social Security and Medicare, tariffs, excise taxes, corporate taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, state and local income taxes, and so on. If they have a problem with taxes, it’s not with the federal income tax.
And that has to include many who are not poor
A bill that cuts federal income taxes for middle-class families makes absolutely no sense, except as a sad way of camouflaging the real intent of the bill: Giving millions of dollars to the very wealthy, who happen to be the only people who are really benefiting from our uneven economic growth.
Here is more for you to chew on:
Trump's Tax Plan Is An Act Of Political Domination By The Rich | HuffPost
Trump wants a massive tax cut for the very wealthy. He doesn’t really care how much it costs, or what it will do to the federal budget deficit, or to economic growth or to worker productivity. He isn’t even very picky about how, exactly, taxes for the rich are reduced, so long as they are diminished by a very large amount.
More:
GOP tax plan favors the richest, analysis shows
The new GOP tax framework would spread tax cuts across all income groups, with the richest Americans seeing the biggest windfall.
- And, if enacted, the package would blow a $2.4 trillion hole in the federal budget.
- That's the finding of an analysis by the Tax Policy Center, which crunched the numbers to come up with a preliminary estimate of the plan's costs and beneficiaries.
Now, as I asked earlier, how do you defend any of this? Whining about the lazy no good poor people is just a red herring
The poor contribute little to nothing to society. When are they going to pay their fair share. If they don't want to contribute their parts, that's OK. Don't expect to benefit from society like those that do their part.
The argument of they pay other taxes is meaningless. The only way that would mean something is if those of us paying income taxes didn't have to pay those others. We pay both. Your argument is foolish and nothing more than an excuse for people that do nothing to benefit society.
And what exactly is their " fair share" when they have so little? . What do you mean by " benefit to society"?? I just pointed out to you that most poor people work. They also have families and struggle to support them and raise their kids to be responsible and productive.
I'm foolish? Listen to yourself!! You are blinded by your disdain for anyone who you perceive as being a laggard- whether or not they are- and refuse to understand that poverty is not usually a product of individual failing but rather a systemic problem inherent in a capitalistic economy.
Whatever it takes to fulfill the claim by Liberals that living in a society involves contributing to it. Putting in nothing isn't contributing to it.
Since many on welfare are multi-generational, just how have they raised their kids to be responsible and productive if their kids and, in many cases, grandkids still live on the dole? By the way, if the taxpayers are subsidizing someone, whether they work or not, those families are supporting their kids. The taxpayers are. Another false narrative by the left.
When you rely on the taxpayers to support you because you won't support yourself, what benefit are you providing to society? You're taking from those that do support themselves then calling them greedy if they aren't willing to provide more.
Typical blame someone or something else for an individual's failings. Capitalism provides all sorts of opportunities. Interesting how you believe when someone fails it has nothing to do with them. That's also another false narrative of the left and nothing more than making excuses. If you give them enough excuses, they'll never have to do better because always come up with why it isn't their fault. Someone that quits school is the cause of their own situation, not capitalism. Someone that has no work ethic is the cause of their own situation, not capitalism. Someone that stays in trouble with the law constantly is the cause of their own situation, not capitalism. Someone that chooses to spread her legs and produce kids with multiple baby daddies is the cause of her situation, not capitalism. You can come up all sorts of excuses for people. How about coming up with a reason for them to do better?
