Independent thinker
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2015
- 39,719
- 36,319
- 2,788
- Thread starter
- #21
So now you want to fight wars with no loss of life or just not do any wars at all because someone might die?Same question- what would be the loss of life?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So now you want to fight wars with no loss of life or just not do any wars at all because someone might die?Same question- what would be the loss of life?
Funny how they refuse to accept that while trying to claim that their nuclear ambitions are only peaceful.Better to take it away and remove all their centrifuges.
We offered them free nuclear fuel, that and solar and oil/gas should provide more than enough energy.
A blockade has historically been an effective tactic. It might be more effective than bombing military targets.Iran is screwed.
On top of that we offered them free nuclear fuel if they stop enriching, they said NO.Funny how they refuse to accept that while trying to claim that their nuclear ambitions are only peaceful.
Loss of life is part of war. When decisions are made on going to war, with boots on the ground, if the cost of meeting the objective is too high, you don't put boots on the ground.So now you want to fight wars with no loss of life or just not do any wars at all because someone might die?
Actually, they produce a lot of crude oil but vey little gasoline.Like the USA, Iraq, Iran and Libya are big producers of gasoline.
Gas prices today
USA: $4.00
Iraq $2.65
Iran (you know, the brutal, cruel, hateful 12th Century barbarians) $.11/gallon 11 cents per gallon
Libya .09 to .11
I have said repeadedly that we don't need to put boots on the ground to get the enriched uranium. You only hear what you want to hear and only read what you want to read.Loss of life is part of war. When decisions are made on going to war, with boots on the ground, if the cost of meeting the objective is too high, you don't put boots on the ground.
Do you feel it does not matter how many lives it takes, you put boots on the ground, if that what it takes to get the enriched uranium.
You lay out a good case for just invading Iran and annexing it as a US territory.Like the USA, Iraq, Iran and Libya are big producers of gasoline.
Gas prices today
USA: $4.00
Iraq $2.65
Iran (you know, the brutal, cruel, hateful 12th Century barbarians) $.11/gallon 11 cents per gallon
Libya .09 to .11
Not true. The 460 kg of 60% enriched uranium is still there, buried, and Iran is digging it out to make bombs.Pete Hegseth accidentally confesses that Iran’s nuclear program was obliterated and not an imminent threat, which means just like Iraq this entire war was based on a lie.
What I hear from multiple sources on all sides of the political spectrum that it is doubtfull they can get the uranium without boots on the groundI have said repeadedly that we don't need to put boots on the ground to get the enriched uranium. You only hear what you want to hear and only read what you want to read.
I don't care what others say. I have my own opinions. First, we don't really need to get the uranium. It is currently buried and probably will be for some time. Second, if we solve the first problem of getting rid of the revolutionary guard and have real regime change, the enriched uranium problem will take care of itself.What I hear from multiple sources on all sides of the political spectrum that it is doubtfull they can get the uranium without boots on the ground
Multiple sources all imaginary?What I hear from multiple sources on all sides of the political spectrum that it is doubtfull they can get the uranium without boots on the ground
Just Iran’s economy, right? You really thought about thisWe wait until Iran cant pump oil anymore just a few days away. They run out of storage and must shut down their wells which cant be restarted. Their economy will collapse.
I thought it was destroyed last summer?Multiple sources all imaginary?
The campaign will not be over until they do hand it over.
It is not clear you do any thinking at all, but the ayatollahs' enrichment centers were destroyed last summer, but after a few months activities were observed at the sites US intelligence believed meant the ayatollahs were either trrying to rebuild the sites or retrieving equipment to use elsewhere and it was necessary to convince them this would not be turn out well for them; hence this war.
Did the Iranians use Miele vacuum cleaners to collect the uranium dust from the “obliterated” facilities?It is not clear you do any thinking at all, but the ayatollahs' enrichment centers were destroyed last summer, but after a few months activities were observed at the sites US intelligence believed meant the ayatollahs were either trrying to rebuild the sites or retrieving equipment to use elsewhere and it was necessary to convince them this would not be turn out well for them; hence this war.
The US position is very clear: the ayatollahs must get rid of all enrichment equipment and end all efforts to enrich uranium; it must get rid of all offensive missiles and stop trying to build them; they must give up their claim to the Strait of Hormuz; they must end their support of their Arab proxies.
This was also Obama's starting position in his negotiations with the ayatollahs, but after two years of arguing, Obama capitulated on every point to the ayatollahs.
We really need a "WTF" emoji in the "Thanks" button.Did the Iranians use Miele vacuum cleaners to collect the uranium dust from the “obliterated” facilities?
Was Jared’s Spidey Sense Tingling from the uranium dust?
Were you surprised at the dramatic change in weather, the ending of a decade long drought, after the US “radars” were eliminated?
Ask Pakistan. The not only have enriched uranium, but ready A-bombs.We want that 460 kg of enriched uranium. Entirely consistent rationale'.