A strategy for the empowerment of the purge is revealed.

[gtopa1]

The lobbyists would never get a fair shot at only twenty.

Good. Most sensible thing you've said in twenty years!!!

lmao

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

It was Upton Sinclair, I think, who said words to the effect that it was difficult to get a man to understand something when the man's salary depended on him not understanding it.

I guess the same thing applies to invested ego as applies to salary.

Yes; you're on a roll!! YOUR CONCLUSION?? (This is where you normally fuck up)!!!

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

It was Upton Sinclair, I think, who said words to the effect that it was difficult to get a man to understand something when the man's salary depended on him not understanding it.

I guess the same thing applies to invested ego as applies to salary.

I guess the same thing applies to invested ego as applies to salary.

Yes, yes...............................c'mon man!!! The CONCLUSION??? WHOSE salaries and WHOSE egos??

Greg

 

[Stryder50]

He's trying to expand the power of the presidency. These shouldn't be difficult concepts to grasp.

Nor should they be difficult concepts to prove, which you HAVE NOT DONE !!!

 

[Stryder50]

The judge adjudicates, not the President.

A judge is not Gawd.
Nor does a judge have authority to rewrite the Constitution; only to obey and apply such.

 

[BackAgain]

He was confirmed 98-0.

https://www.congress.gov/nomination/112th-congress/157

So, that makes him a judge nominated by Obama and unanimously approved by Repub senators.

Meh. Mistakes happen.

 

[westwall]

He's trying to expand the power of the presidency. These shouldn't be difficult concepts to grasp.

No he isn't. He's right in the middle of the lane. Your corrupt judges though, they ARE trying to expand their power, and they are going to get slapped down.

 

[BackAgain]

In the executive branch only, and the judges can adjudicate to the extent he can.

The tragically misinformed Retarded Horses babbles again.

Judges aren’t the executive branch. They are supposed to adhere to the Constitution. And many of them seem not to even grasp that much.

 

[Michael Werner]

libtards got purged in November

 

[fncceo]

A strategy for the empowerment of the purge is revealed.​

About time they green lit the sequel.

 

[BackAgain]

libtards got purged in November

And now? Now they’re working hard on their own suicide.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Nor should they be difficult concepts to prove, which you HAVE NOT DONE !!!

Sure he has. But you have failed.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

A judge is not Gawd.
Nor does a judge have authority to rewrite the Constitution; only to obey and apply such.

And this judiciary is doing just that and making Trump obey the Constitution.

 

[BackAgain]

And this judiciary is doing just that and making Trump obey the Constitution.

Nonsense.

 

[Stann]

Trump Argues That Courts Cannot Block Musk’s Team From Treasury Systems​

Judge Engelmayer said in an emergency order that the officials’ access heightened the risk of leaks and of the systems becoming more vulnerable than before to hacking. He set a hearing in the case for Friday.

Federal lawyers defending Mr. Trump — as well as the Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, and the Treasury Department — called the order “markedly overboard” and said the court should dismiss the injunction, or at least modify his order.

They argued that the order violated the Constitution by ignoring the separation of powers and severing the executive branch’s right to appoint its own employees. The restriction, they wrote, “draws an impermissible and anti-constitutional distinction” between civil servants and political appointees working in the Treasury Department.

The filing followed warning shots over the weekend. Vice President JD Vance declared that the courts and judges aren’t allowed “to control the executive’s legitimate power,” although American courts have long engaged in the practice of judicial review.

Trump Argues That Courts Cannot Block Musk’s Team From Treasury Systems

The president’s lawyers argued that the distinction between civil servants and political appointees was unworkable and unconstitutional. A hearing is set for Friday.

www.nytimes.com

I am far from the first person to note virtually everything Don is doing with respect to government employees is in pursuit of expanding executive power. Not just by claiming the authority to break current law but by installing obedient lackeys to take the place of non-partisan civil servants.

Right now it's simply causing extreme chaos but firing those nuclear employees put US at risk in a very serious manner. It's definitely time for the Supreme Court to step in and issue a Cease and Desist Order for the Executive Branch in f government and let's pray to GOD that Congress stands united in support of them. We cannot wait until they make US even more vulnerable.

 

[kyzr]

Right now it's simply causing extreme chaos but firing those nuclear employees put US at risk in a very serious manner. It's definitely time for the Supreme Court to step in and issue a Cease and Desist Order for the Executive Branch in f government and let's pray to GOD that Congress stands united in support of them. We cannot wait until they make US even more vulnerable.

Cutting out fraud, waste and abuse. It needs to be done.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Cutting out fraud, waste and abuse. It needs to be done.

Fine. You don't shut down the engine here, though.

 

[whitehall]

Revealed? The NYT was part of the big lie about the Biden/Fauci/Harris administration.

 

[berg80]

As of the weekend it sounds like the strategy is to claim actually breaking the law depends on whether a criminal thinks the law can be broken.

 

[berg80]

Revealed? The NYT was part of the big lie about the Biden/Fauci/Harris administration.

You have lost all perspective and no longer can be trusted to discern the difference between facts and fiction. Making you an enemy of the state.