Trump Is Going To Lose Most Of The Current Federal Court Cases....Then What?

[Vrenn]

He should. At least until these cases have been heard by a panel of judges, not just lone activists and such. I would not support defying a Supreme Court ruling. We aren't Democrats after all.

I agree, but you aren't a Republican Either. You are a MAGAt terrorist and traitor.

 

[Slade3200]

I knew you were incapable of following along.

You don’t have the slightest bit of common sense or any sense of any kind.

I already noted that the President is limited in what he can do as President to the requirement that it be Constitutionally allowed. But within those parameters, how he proceeds is his call. Not any judges.

If you ever obtain any sense at all, send up a flare.

No shit. So when somebody says a judge has no right interfering with the executives absolute power they are full of shit because the executives power is limited to what is constitutionally allowed. You need to stop chiming in on threads that you don’t understand

 

[Slade3200]

So you attack me instead of backing up your argument, or giving up your argument. You lose, again.

My argument was made…. There is no rationale to excuse supporting traitors and cop assaulters… calling them patriots. What a joke.
You replying that there’s a new sheriff in town is abandoning the argument

 

[Slade3200]

That’s absolutely NOT what it says.

You persist in misreading the Amendment. It’s a shit way to discuss the subject.

Here:



Now that you hopefully have a clear view of what the Amendment ACTUALLY says, maybe we can get down to why the Interpretation of the Amendment needs to be corrected.

In that regard, courts look to the roots of any such law or Amensmwnt. Therefore it matters what one of the Amendmwnt’s own sponsors said at the time:


What 'Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof' Really Means - The Federalist Blog (my emphasis is supplied).

There a great deal of additional item of support for what was intended as opposed to how it has been interpreted to date.

See:


Id.

Note. It is a topic worthy of additional discussion and debate. And, yes, there are two or more sides. But given what was said during the initial debates, I am hopeful that SCOTUS will accept the case (sooner rather than later) so that we can get on about the business of (hopefully) correcting the long-standing misinterpretation.

Oh boy, do we need to get you a dictionary so you can look up what the word jurisdiction means? I swear, I’ve never seen such a large bunch of illiterate man children in my life.

 

[Blisterfinger]

My argument was made…. There is no rationale to excuse supporting traitors and cop assaulters… calling them patriots. What a joke.
You replying that there’s a new sheriff in town is abandoning the argument

What a crock of shit you project. Your argument against the Sixers is null and void due to discrimination and political bias. If you weren't just full of hate you would understand, but you are, so you won't. You're kind of a dumbass also.

 

[Slade3200]

What a crock of shit you project. Your argument against the Sixers is null and void due to discrimination and political bias. If you weren't just full of hate you would understand, but you are, so you won't. You're kind of a dumbass also.

Wrong. You don’t excuse criminal acts because the criminals were punished harshly. You certainly dont call them patriots.

 

[Contumacious]

Trump Is Going To Lose Most Of The Current Federal Court Cases....Then What?​

 

[Mac-7]

Considering that the 14th amendment is in force, the only thing the SC can do is to kick it back and not rule on it.

No, the SC can revise its previous ruling

Honestly, its a long shot because the judges hate admit they can be wrong

But we have to try

 

[BackAgain]

No shit. So when somebody says a judge has no right interfering with the executives absolute power they are full of shit because the executives power is limited to what is constitutionally allowed. You need to stop chiming in on threads that you don’t understand

As I noted correctly, you are either incapable of following along or you choose to lie.

A judge can (validly) step in under circumstances where the actions of the President are subject to genuine issues involving overstepping his Constitutional bounds.

I never said or suggested otherwise. In fact, what I did say was properly limited. Your cheese dick efforts to distort that demonstrates that you aren’t interested in an honest discussion.

Not exactly a new thing with you, is it?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No, the SC can revise its previous ruling

Honestly, its a long shot because the judges hate admit they can be wrong

But we have to try

No, it will be denied hearing.

 

[BackAgain]

No shit. So when somebody says a judge has no right interfering with the executives absolute power they are full of shit because the executives power is limited to what is constitutionally allowed. You need to stop chiming in on threads that you don’t understand

Unlike you, by the way, I am the one who does understand this topic.

Your ongoing ignorance, by contrast, is monumental.

 

[Slade3200]

As I noted correctly, you are either incapable of following along or you choose to lie.

A judge can (validly) step in under circumstances where the actions of the President are subject to genuine issues involving overstepping his Constitutional bounds.

I never said or suggested otherwise. In fact, what I did say was properly limited. Your cheese dick efforts to distort that demonstrates that you aren’t interested in an honest discussion.

Not exactly a new thing with you, is it?

Right… well what you’re saying NOW is exactly what I said when I responded to KYDR, ya know the post you the chimed in to object to?!

 

[Blisterfinger]

Wrong. You don’t excuse criminal acts because the criminals were punished harshly. You certainly dont call them patriots.

Blanket discrimination and bias leads to blanket pardons. Get used to it

 

[BackAgain]

No, it will be denied hearing.

You’re another one who says shit as if you have a clue. You don’t.

 

[BackAgain]

Right… well what you’re saying NOW is exactly what I said when I responded to KYDR, ya know the post you the chimed in to object to?!

No. I’ve been right since I stepped in.

Your permission is not required, by the way.

Maybe consider getting over yourself.

 

[Slade3200]

Blanket discrimination and bias leads to blanket pardons. Get used to it

Not for those who actually committed crimes. Beat up cops, planned sedition, destroyed our capital. No sir, those people are not patriots and they should not be excused.

If you think others were mistreated then let them sue the state for mistreatment and reap a financial reward. I do t think we are going to see many or any of those cases though

 

[Slade3200]

No. I’ve been right since I stepped in.

Your permission is not required, by the way.

Maybe consider getting over yourself.

I am all over myself and your tired tactics. You jumped in with one story then changed it to match my original argument.

 

[BackAgain]

Oh boy, do we need to get you a dictionary so you can look up what the word jurisdiction means? I swear, I’ve never seen such a large bunch of illiterate man children in my life.

Again, jurisdiction has several meanings.

Another fact you ignorant blowhards can’t grasp.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Not for those who actually committed crimes. Beat up cops, planned sedition, destroyed our capital. No sir, those people are not patriots and they should not be excused.

If you think others were mistreated then let them sue the state for mistreatment and reap a financial reward. I do t think we are going to see many or any of those cases though

We don't have time for lawfare. Yes sir most of them prosecuted under the auspices of illegality, persecuted. Cannot stand and did not. Stop whining

 

[BackAgain]

I am all over myself and your tired tactics. You jumped in with one story then changed it to match my original argument.

I haven’t changed a thing. As you know.

Why are you still bothering to lie.

We’re all on to the cheese dick style of your form of “discussion.” When you get exposed, you lash out as you’ve done here.

Do you lie to compensate? You’ve got a micro dick don’t you?