Trump: Iran paid for missiles used to target US soldiers with money released by Obama

How can anyone believe a single word Trump says? I think he went over the 10,000 lie mark last month, but the long and short of it is that he is not to be trusted. Here is a simple test for a simple Con-dumb mind. Prove Obama paid for those missiles or STFU.

Prove Obama paid for those missiles or STFU.

Nobody said Obama paid for them.

They said they were paid for with the money Obama released
Cultists would prefer that we just stole their money that we`ve been sitting on for a long time. It wouldn`t be much different than the president robbing his own Foundation which he recently was fined for or robbing 4,000 suckers at Trump U. Not only do they approve of Trump`s criminal behavior they want to be just like him, following in the footsteps of Orange Jesus.
 
Trumps got a LOT of moxie to imagine he can tell straight faced LIES to the American public from the WH podium

he's an absolute disgrace to the oval office

~S~
 
Trump truthfully represented their ardent desire to "Stick it to 'em."

even should one subscribe to that, what's Trump got?

One high ranking terrorist , big whoop

the potential 'stick it' looks more like all our service men & women placed in harms way

~S~

In this case - U.S. forces attacked by missiles paid for by $150bn handed to Iran by the Obama administration - the 'em in "Stick it to 'em" represents the Obama administration and its supporters. You know, the administration headed by a black man that made Trumpletons suffer for eight years under that terrible, horrible ignominy.

Also, had any of the U.S. generals pursued the national interest as ruthlessly, and with such diplomatic and battlefield skills as did Gen. Soleimani, Trumpletons would erect shrines in his name.

Of course, we know the Pentagon placed Soleimani on the list of potential targets as an extremist option. Trump initially declined, and only after the storming of the U.S. embassy reception hall picked it, days later, and the Pentagon goofs were aghast about it. That necessitated them to come up with the "imminent attack" rationale, which was a brazen and obvious lie from the get-go. The result of that imbecility is, of course, putting "our service men & women [...] in harms way." Also, the fight against the remnants of Daesh is now off, Iraqis realigned with Iran, Iranians aligned behind the mullahs, and the U.S. on the brink of being thrown out of Iraq, again. That is to say, it's an all-around foreign policy disaster - as anyone with a lick of insight into the dynamics of the region could have predicted. Trumpletons, of course, couldn't be giddier.
 
Trump often makes it sound like the United States cut a check to Iran as part of the Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). He also always uses too high an estimate, $150 billion, for the assets involved.

But this was always Iran’s money. Iran had billions of dollars frozen in foreign banks around the globe because of international sanctions over its nuclear program. The Treasury Department estimated that once Iran fulfilled other obligations, it would have about $55 billion left. The Central Bank of Iran said the number was actually $32 billion.

As for the $1.8 billion (actually, $1.7 billion), this was related to the settlement of a decades-old claim between the two countries, not the Iran nuclear agreement. An initial payment of $400 million was handed over on Jan. 17, 2016, the day after Iran released four American detainees, including Washington Post correspondent Jason Rezaian.

All money is fungible, but Trump is stretching the factual evidence to blame the missiles on the deal negotiated by the Obama administration. Experts say such a claim is far-fetched and that actual intelligence tying Iran deal monies directly to the missiles is highly unlikely. The White House did not respond to a request for evidence.

“There’s no way to corroborate that,” said Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran policy analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “It’s such an obviously unprovable claim I’m surprised it wasn’t excised.”

The guy will just throw out a lie and these damn stinking Trump Humpers just eat it up.

You do know whenever you are copying & pasting text that is another person's work, you are supposed to provide a link to the source. I mean, how hard can that be, brutha?

My bad Old E, I thought there was a link in it.
 
How can anyone believe a single word Trump says? I think he went over the 10,000 lie mark last month, but the long and short of it is that he is not to be trusted. Here is a simple test for a simple Con-dumb mind. Prove Obama paid for those missiles or STFU.

Prove Obama paid for those missiles or STFU.

Nobody said Obama paid for them.

They said they were paid for with the money Obama released
Cultists would prefer that we just stole their money that we`ve been sitting on for a long time. It wouldn`t be much different than the president robbing his own Foundation which he recently was fined for or robbing 4,000 suckers at Trump U. Not only do they approve of Trump`s criminal behavior they want to be just like him, following in the footsteps of Orange Jesus.

Not being a 'Cultist', I know that the was money was theirs to begin with, and Obama was merely returning it.

not really the point.


The point is, there is a high probability those funds were used to purchase missiles, such as the ones used in the recent attack.
 
The point is the implication Iran would not have had the missiles for yesterday's strike were it not for President Obama giving the money back.

That, of course, is perfectly ludicrous.
 
The missiles that hit the US base were midrange missiles which they had for decades before the Nuclear Deal
 
In this case - U.S. forces attacked by missiles paid for by $150bn handed to Iran by the Obama administration - the 'em in "Stick it to 'em" represents the Obama administration and its supporters. You know, the administration headed by a black man that made Trumpletons suffer for eight years under that terrible, horrible ignominy.
At least Iran's hopes and prospects flourished while Barry Obama was in office.


Also, had any of the U.S. generals pursued the national interest as ruthlessly, and with such diplomatic and battlefield skills as did Gen. Soleimani, Trumpletons would erect shrines in his name.
This is just idiotic on so many levels. Soleimanii was not a diplomat He was a brutal butcher who drilled holes in the legs of little children for his own amusement, for example. I Saw Qasem Soleimani's Brand of Evil Firsthand — It's Worse Than You Could Possibly Imagine
This is the man who you extol and praise. Got any good words for the generals of the Third Reich?
This makes you a monster too. Congratulations!

Soleimani's sole purpose was directing Iran's global terrorist network and he was personally sanctioned by the UN and the EU.


Of course, we know the Pentagon placed Soleimani on the list of potential targets as an extremist option.
There it is again.... a defense of Qasem Soleimani as if he was just a very good soldier marked for death
by "extremists" in the Pentagon without any hint at all of the sort of violence and sadism Soleimani dealt in as Iran's top terrorist. It turns my stomach.
Now would be a good time to read my citation again, if you indeed bothered before.

Trump initially declined, and only after the storming of the U.S. embassy reception hall picked it, days later, and the Pentagon goofs were aghast about it. That necessitated them to come up with the "imminent attack" rationale, which was a brazen and obvious lie from the get-go.
This is 100% projection and a product of your bias and obvious admiration for the butcher Qasem Soleimani.
If you have any proof at all of your claim you should post it but of course you cannot. Feel free to fuck off!

The result of that imbecility is, of course, putting "our service men & women [...] in harms way." Also, the fight against the remnants of Daesh is now off, Iraqis realigned with Iran, Iranians aligned behind the mullahs, and the U.S. on the brink of being thrown out of Iraq, again. That is to say, it's an all-around foreign policy disaster - as anyone with a lick of insight into the dynamics of the region could have predicted. Trumpletons, of course, couldn't be giddier.
If you had a drone at the start of WWII and could take out Hitler saving tens of thousands of lives, would you do it?
Or would you not, worried about the sort of political blow back such an action would cause thereby consigning millions to death eventually?

Of course I'm sure you wouldn't pull that trigger if you thought it would please Trump supporters.
 
Last edited:
So, theft is totally legal. Totally cool.
The money was frozen, not stolen. Do you know the difference between the two words?
Can you find someone who does to explain the difference to you?

The context of the discussion, in which you purposely cropped out, a discussion you were no part of originally, was that it was permissible to keep Iran's money indefinitely because they are deemed a terrorist state by the powers that be. Do you have an impairment of some sort that stifles reading comprehension?
 
The context of the discussion, in which you purposely cropped out, a discussion you were no part of originally, was that it was permissible to keep Iran's money indefinitely because they are deemed a terrorist state by the powers that be. Do you have an impairment of some sort that stifles reading comprehension?
Iran's assets were frozen after Iran seized the American embassy, in opposition to all legal and diplomatic conventions of the civilized world (maybe something you missed) and other outrageous behavior.
Why are you telling me what I already know but you don't?

That money was not stolen ("theft" as you so stupidly called it) and freezing assets is a common tool in any enterprise
when legal authority steps in and withholds assets to criminal entities (the Mafia or drug cartels, for instance). until restitution can be paid or the law breakers are legally dealt with and such money is properly disposed of.

You must be especially stupid, you are, incidentally, acting like I don't know what's going on but you do.

To call Iran's frozen assets "theft" shows a total ignorance of the whole matter. Get a clue, asshole. Iranian frozen assets - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Trump recounted some of Iran's bad behavior, noting that its "hostilities substantially increased after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2013, and they were given $150 billion -- not to mention $1.8 billion in cash."


https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/obama-iran-terrorism/

Trump: 'Iran Went on a Terror Spree Funded by the Money From the Deal' With Obama
Trump recounted some of Iran's bad behavior, noting that its "hostilities substantially increased after the foolish Iran nuclear deal was signed in 2013, and they were given $150 billion -- not to mention $1.8 billion in cash."


https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/obama-iran-terrorism/

Trump: 'Iran Went on a Terror Spree Funded by the Money From the Deal' With Obama
Who bunch of unsubstantiated claims there...
o3pd5f454r941.jpg
 
Pulling women’s fingernails out so they can’t scratch you while you rape them and maiming children with drills is not terrorists work but rather sadistic work of mentally ill perverts YET liberals weep over their demise.
 
Trumps got a LOT of moxie to imagine he can tell straight faced LIES to the American public from the WH podium
Don'cha just love that sing-song voice and side-to-side motion he uses when he reads a teleprompter. Makes you think Trump is as sincere as the Serpent in the Garden of Eden as he lies about 'imminence".
Then there's those poor people standing behind him with the darting eyes trying to go invisible...
 
Pulling women’s fingernails out so they can’t scratch you while you rape them and maiming children with drills is not terrorists work but rather sadistic work of mentally ill perverts YET liberals weep over their demise.

This rocks got more than it's share buckko....so you'd best have a BIG cryin' towel

More i'll weep over our fine service men and women Trump needlessly is endangering for his own ego

~S~
 

Forum List

Back
Top