Trump " I have not conceded"

[Lesh]

Robert Byrd admitted he was in the KKK

An renounce his affiliation about the time Ike was elected President.

David duke did the same thing.

The GOP rejected duke, awarding him precisely zero delegates in 1992, and then not allowing him entry into the convention.


The Dems embraced the sheety cyclops, promoted him, cherished him, and let him speak at the convention.


Here you are democrats. We all know we are not racists here. Let's welcome Ku klux klan enchanted cyclops

Robert Byrd


Cheers erupt, standing ovation.....

Democrats were the racist party of segregation at the time. He was from Virginia.

It's it funny how all the Northern States flipped to the Democrat "racist party of segregation." You morons always pretend the South left. Actually the north joined. The south had almost all the seats before the Democrats started turning socialist. Then the south left

Except the part in history, you must missed, when the Democrats in the North teamed up the the Republican in the North and they pass that Civil Rights bill in 1964. Sort of like the second coming of the Civil War. And the Democrats became the Big Tent inclusive party. They still let their Southern Cousins in until the Southern population were convinced that the GOP was the party that would up hold their "traditional values".

Then the left Republicans in the North became Democrats joining the racists in the South. Funny how they did that. What are now the Democrat States specifically went out and joined the racists. They knew what they were. Then you have a racist President as head of your party today and you still believe blacks are your property as any black who tries to leave the Democrat party immediately learns that lynching has not gone away, it's just gone high tech

Ah the history of things that never happened.

Bull shit. That the modern Democrat cities in the North were Republicans, then the leftists joined up with the racists in the south is not factually disputable.

Democrats just lie, about everything. It's the essence of your soul. You're liars.

Democrats are the party of slavery, Jim Crow, the KKK, lynching, cross burning, segregation. Now you're the party where whites scream racist, racist, racist at other whites.

All that is consistent is to you blacks were never free and they still aren't. They are in one way or another your property.

Just ask any black which is the racist party. Ask them in 1865, 1920 or 1955. Ask any black who tried to leave you in 2021 and you'll get the same answer

Do you KNOW any black folks? Sure doesn’t sound like it

 

[Lesh]

Robert Byrd admitted he was in the KKK

An renounce his affiliation about the time Ike was elected President.

David duke did the same thing.

The GOP rejected duke, awarding him precisely zero delegates in 1992, and then not allowing him entry into the convention.


The Dems embraced the sheety cyclops, promoted him, cherished him, and let him speak at the convention.


Here you are democrats. We all know we are not racists here. Let's welcome Ku klux klan enchanted cyclops

Robert Byrd


Cheers erupt, standing ovation.....

Democrats were the racist party of segregation at the time. He was from Virginia.

It's it funny how all the Northern States flipped to the Democrat "racist party of segregation." You morons always pretend the South left. Actually the north joined. The south had almost all the seats before the Democrats started turning socialist. Then the south left

Except the part in history, you must missed, when the Democrats in the North teamed up the the Republican in the North and they pass that Civil Rights bill in 1964. Sort of like the second coming of the Civil War. And the Democrats became the Big Tent inclusive party. They still let their Southern Cousins in until the Southern population were convinced that the GOP was the party that would up hold their "traditional values".

Then the left Republicans in the North became Democrats joining the racists in the South. Funny how they did that. What are now the Democrat States specifically went out and joined the racists. They knew what they were. Then you have a racist President as head of your party today and you still believe blacks are your property as any black who tries to leave the Democrat party immediately learns that lynching has not gone away, it's just gone high tech

Ah the history of things that never happened.

And yet anyone who looks up that the North was Republican in the 1950s then all those States flipped to Democrat is undisputable.

Democrats lying, it's what you do

Hey dude… the racist south… in now Republican

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

That is NOT what the Democrat party told me to think!!!!!! Hour after hour of nothing but what Democrats told you to think

Democrats told me to think nothing.

And you've been doing a real good job at that, Jack!

80+ court cases between the lower courts and Supreme Court tossed

You mean declined, and/or dismissed for late filing, lack of standing and other technical reasons.

told me that judges..you know, the people that actually make decisions everyday saw no evidence of fraud.

How did they know when they never reviewed the evidence, having the cases each only for hours or a few days? And how were all the news outlets reporting it all baseless and debunked on November 6 when the court cases hadn't even been heard yet at that time and it is taking months now just to audit one city in Arizona and the dems want months and months just to "investigate" what happened on 1/6? All your judges really must have been real miracle workers!

You keep repeating the same shit over and over.

Jack, ALL YOU'VE EVER DONE is repeat the same shit over and over, which is to say or offer NOTHING BUT BULL.

So when you gonna start that discussion on election fraud? Are we we taking bets on how many posts it will take before you give it up?
Over 50+ court cases were dismissed for LACK OF EVIDENCE. Why is it you have to be told this over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

And for the record, I don't care about a 1/6 investigation. I'll settle for releasing the names of the Republican Senators and Congresspeople who aided the rioters in the days leading up to 1/6 with logistics, guided tours, and encouragement. Their texts, their emails, their social media correspondence. Release the names and the correspondence. I'll be happy with that.

That's a lie. The courts did not hear the merits of the cases, they made them go away on technicalities.

Jack hangs desperately onto that lie despite being proven wrong time and again.

HE IGNORES the roughly 80 people and organizations who have already admitted to stealing the election to stop a Trump reelection.

HE IGNORES the fact that people were making his argument time and again long before any of the cases went to trial!

HE IGNORED the fact that they keep changing the numbers: his link claims 50 cases while he claims over 80!

HE IGNORED the fact the Reuters lies saying: "the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.” When we all know the cases HAD to focus on smaller complaints that were within the purview of any given courts jurisdiction because no single court has jurisdiction across all six states! He ignores that you don't bring fraud charges because fraud proper is near impossible to prove. He ignores that even his own article says they were "largely" dismissed, meaning not all. He IGNORED the fact that no one goes to court without evidence, at best, a judge might rule that the evidence presented didn't meet the conditions necessary to prove the charges.

Jack IGNORES the fact that Reuters DID NO FACT CHECKING but are merely regurgitating what 3rd parties told them, parties with an interest in the OUTCOME of the election.

Jack IGNORES the fact that all this has been proven him before.

And Jack IGNORED the lengthy documentation I've presented here in Michigan alone claiming I've offered nothing despite my linking him to it on several occasions.

And despite no evidence to the contrary, no ability to show how, when or by who all of the evidence has been "debunked," Jack makes the same lame accusations over and over yet fails to provide ANYTHING to support his accusations other than the words of third parties.

Taken together, all of this combines circumstantially to show that Jack is lying and KNOWS he is lying.

No one has admitted to stealing any election.

Get your fat head out of your puckered, lying ass. Time Magazine published the names back in February.

There were over 50 cases that judges dismissed on the evidence..or lack thereof.

So Trump won 30 cases?

You've presented nothing but conspiracy theories about Michigan.

Your hollow claim. Prove it.

Put up. Or STFU. Be a man. Start your thread and let's go.

Jack, the point of my thread is to compile and weigh the available evidence. Not decide the outcome. You better hope you have lots of documentation to counter it because otherwise, when I do my massive thread, probably the most massive undertaking in the history of USMB, I can tell you already that without proof to the contrary, Trump will win the thread hands down.

Get to work. You should be happy I'm giving you added time.

Then...start it. Or close it.
Geez, you really believe your own hype, don't you?

 

[toobfreak]

That is NOT what the Democrat party told me to think!!!!!! Hour after hour of nothing but what Democrats told you to think

Democrats told me to think nothing.

And you've been doing a real good job at that, Jack!

80+ court cases between the lower courts and Supreme Court tossed

You mean declined, and/or dismissed for late filing, lack of standing and other technical reasons.

told me that judges..you know, the people that actually make decisions everyday saw no evidence of fraud.

How did they know when they never reviewed the evidence, having the cases each only for hours or a few days? And how were all the news outlets reporting it all baseless and debunked on November 6 when the court cases hadn't even been heard yet at that time and it is taking months now just to audit one city in Arizona and the dems want months and months just to "investigate" what happened on 1/6? All your judges really must have been real miracle workers!

You keep repeating the same shit over and over.

Jack, ALL YOU'VE EVER DONE is repeat the same shit over and over, which is to say or offer NOTHING BUT BULL.

So when you gonna start that discussion on election fraud? Are we we taking bets on how many posts it will take before you give it up?
Over 50+ court cases were dismissed for LACK OF EVIDENCE. Why is it you have to be told this over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

And for the record, I don't care about a 1/6 investigation. I'll settle for releasing the names of the Republican Senators and Congresspeople who aided the rioters in the days leading up to 1/6 with logistics, guided tours, and encouragement. Their texts, their emails, their social media correspondence. Release the names and the correspondence. I'll be happy with that.

That's a lie. The courts did not hear the merits of the cases, they made them go away on technicalities.

Jack hangs desperately onto that lie despite being proven wrong time and again.

HE IGNORES the roughly 80 people and organizations who have already admitted to stealing the election to stop a Trump reelection.

HE IGNORES the fact that people were making his argument time and again long before any of the cases went to trial!

HE IGNORED the fact that they keep changing the numbers: his link claims 50 cases while he claims over 80!

HE IGNORED the fact the Reuters lies saying: "the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.” When we all know the cases HAD to focus on smaller complaints that were within the purview of any given courts jurisdiction because no single court has jurisdiction across all six states! He ignores that you don't bring fraud charges because fraud proper is near impossible to prove. He ignores that even his own article says they were "largely" dismissed, meaning not all. He IGNORED the fact that no one goes to court without evidence, at best, a judge might rule that the evidence presented didn't meet the conditions necessary to prove the charges.

Jack IGNORES the fact that Reuters DID NO FACT CHECKING but are merely regurgitating what 3rd parties told them, parties with an interest in the OUTCOME of the election.

Jack IGNORES the fact that all this has been proven him before.

And Jack IGNORED the lengthy documentation I've presented here in Michigan alone claiming I've offered nothing despite my linking him to it on several occasions.

And despite no evidence to the contrary, no ability to show how, when or by who all of the evidence has been "debunked," Jack makes the same lame accusations over and over yet fails to provide ANYTHING to support his accusations other than the words of third parties.

Taken together, all of this combines circumstantially to show that Jack is lying and KNOWS he is lying.

No one has admitted to stealing any election.

Get your fat head out of your puckered, lying ass. Time Magazine published the names back in February.

There were over 50 cases that judges dismissed on the evidence..or lack thereof.

So Trump won 30 cases?

You've presented nothing but conspiracy theories about Michigan.

Your hollow claim. Prove it.

Put up. Or STFU. Be a man. Start your thread and let's go.

Jack, the point of my thread is to compile and weigh the available evidence. Not decide the outcome. You better hope you have lots of documentation to counter it because otherwise, when I do my massive thread, probably the most massive undertaking in the history of USMB, I can tell you already that without proof to the contrary, Trump will win the thread hands down.

Get to work. You should be happy I'm giving you added time.

Then...start it. Or close it.

Eat shit and die, Jack. You sure are in a hurry to see a thread start you have no hope of ever disproving or believing.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

That is NOT what the Democrat party told me to think!!!!!! Hour after hour of nothing but what Democrats told you to think

Democrats told me to think nothing.

And you've been doing a real good job at that, Jack!

80+ court cases between the lower courts and Supreme Court tossed

You mean declined, and/or dismissed for late filing, lack of standing and other technical reasons.

told me that judges..you know, the people that actually make decisions everyday saw no evidence of fraud.

How did they know when they never reviewed the evidence, having the cases each only for hours or a few days? And how were all the news outlets reporting it all baseless and debunked on November 6 when the court cases hadn't even been heard yet at that time and it is taking months now just to audit one city in Arizona and the dems want months and months just to "investigate" what happened on 1/6? All your judges really must have been real miracle workers!

You keep repeating the same shit over and over.

Jack, ALL YOU'VE EVER DONE is repeat the same shit over and over, which is to say or offer NOTHING BUT BULL.

So when you gonna start that discussion on election fraud? Are we we taking bets on how many posts it will take before you give it up?
Over 50+ court cases were dismissed for LACK OF EVIDENCE. Why is it you have to be told this over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

And for the record, I don't care about a 1/6 investigation. I'll settle for releasing the names of the Republican Senators and Congresspeople who aided the rioters in the days leading up to 1/6 with logistics, guided tours, and encouragement. Their texts, their emails, their social media correspondence. Release the names and the correspondence. I'll be happy with that.

That's a lie. The courts did not hear the merits of the cases, they made them go away on technicalities.

Jack hangs desperately onto that lie despite being proven wrong time and again.

HE IGNORES the roughly 80 people and organizations who have already admitted to stealing the election to stop a Trump reelection.

HE IGNORES the fact that people were making his argument time and again long before any of the cases went to trial!

HE IGNORED the fact that they keep changing the numbers: his link claims 50 cases while he claims over 80!

HE IGNORED the fact the Reuters lies saying: "the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.” When we all know the cases HAD to focus on smaller complaints that were within the purview of any given courts jurisdiction because no single court has jurisdiction across all six states! He ignores that you don't bring fraud charges because fraud proper is near impossible to prove. He ignores that even his own article says they were "largely" dismissed, meaning not all. He IGNORED the fact that no one goes to court without evidence, at best, a judge might rule that the evidence presented didn't meet the conditions necessary to prove the charges.

Jack IGNORES the fact that Reuters DID NO FACT CHECKING but are merely regurgitating what 3rd parties told them, parties with an interest in the OUTCOME of the election.

Jack IGNORES the fact that all this has been proven him before.

And Jack IGNORED the lengthy documentation I've presented here in Michigan alone claiming I've offered nothing despite my linking him to it on several occasions.

And despite no evidence to the contrary, no ability to show how, when or by who all of the evidence has been "debunked," Jack makes the same lame accusations over and over yet fails to provide ANYTHING to support his accusations other than the words of third parties.

Taken together, all of this combines circumstantially to show that Jack is lying and KNOWS he is lying.

No one has admitted to stealing any election.

Get your fat head out of your puckered, lying ass. Time Magazine published the names back in February.

There were over 50 cases that judges dismissed on the evidence..or lack thereof.

So Trump won 30 cases?

You've presented nothing but conspiracy theories about Michigan.

Your hollow claim. Prove it.

Put up. Or STFU. Be a man. Start your thread and let's go.

Jack, the point of my thread is to compile and weigh the available evidence. Not decide the outcome. You better hope you have lots of documentation to counter it because otherwise, when I do my massive thread, probably the most massive undertaking in the history of USMB, I can tell you already that without proof to the contrary, Trump will win the thread hands down.

Get to work. You should be happy I'm giving you added time.

Then...start it. Or close it.

Eat shit and die, Jack. You sure are in a hurry to see a thread start you have no hope of ever disproving or believing.

I don't even need to break a sweat to kill your thread in less than 20 posts.
I'm ready when you are. Put up. Or shut up. It's easy. You think you have a winning hand. Play it.
I have the feeling..you're bluffing.

 

[kaz]

Except the part in history, you must missed, when the Democrats in the North teamed up the the Republican in the North and they pass that Civil Rights bill in 1964. Sort of like the second coming of the Civil War. And the Democrats became the Big Tent inclusive party. They still let their Southern Cousins in until the Southern population were convinced that the GOP was the party that would up hold their "traditional values".

Then the left Republicans in the North became Democrats joining the racists in the South. Funny how they did that. What are now the Democrat States specifically went out and joined the racists. They knew what they were. Then you have a racist President as head of your party today and you still believe blacks are your property as any black who tries to leave the Democrat party immediately learns that lynching has not gone away, it's just gone high tech

Ah the history of things that never happened.

Bull shit. That the modern Democrat cities in the North were Republicans, then the leftists joined up with the racists in the south is not factually disputable.

Democrats just lie, about everything. It's the essence of your soul. You're liars.

Democrats are the party of slavery, Jim Crow, the KKK, lynching, cross burning, segregation. Now you're the party where whites scream racist, racist, racist at other whites.

All that is consistent is to you blacks were never free and they still aren't. They are in one way or another your property.

Just ask any black which is the racist party. Ask them in 1865, 1920 or 1955. Ask any black who tried to leave you in 2021 and you'll get the same answer

Do you KNOW any black folks? Sure doesn’t sound like it

What a racist, you think your lily white ass speaks for blacks, LOL

 

[kaz]

Robert Byrd admitted he was in the KKK

An renounce his affiliation about the time Ike was elected President.

David duke did the same thing.

The GOP rejected duke, awarding him precisely zero delegates in 1992, and then not allowing him entry into the convention.


The Dems embraced the sheety cyclops, promoted him, cherished him, and let him speak at the convention.


Here you are democrats. We all know we are not racists here. Let's welcome Ku klux klan enchanted cyclops

Robert Byrd


Cheers erupt, standing ovation.....

Democrats were the racist party of segregation at the time. He was from Virginia.

It's it funny how all the Northern States flipped to the Democrat "racist party of segregation." You morons always pretend the South left. Actually the north joined. The south had almost all the seats before the Democrats started turning socialist. Then the south left

Except the part in history, you must missed, when the Democrats in the North teamed up the the Republican in the North and they pass that Civil Rights bill in 1964. Sort of like the second coming of the Civil War. And the Democrats became the Big Tent inclusive party. They still let their Southern Cousins in until the Southern population were convinced that the GOP was the party that would up hold their "traditional values".

Then the left Republicans in the North became Democrats joining the racists in the South. Funny how they did that. What are now the Democrat States specifically went out and joined the racists. They knew what they were. Then you have a racist President as head of your party today and you still believe blacks are your property as any black who tries to leave the Democrat party immediately learns that lynching has not gone away, it's just gone high tech

Ah the history of things that never happened.

And yet anyone who looks up that the North was Republican in the 1950s then all those States flipped to Democrat is undisputable.

Democrats lying, it's what you do

Hey dude… the racist south… in now Republican

Interesting fact. Most of the people who voted in the 50s are dead. Didn't know that, huh? What's it like being stupid?

Today racists vote Democrat. Oh yeah, that's the same ...

 

[Faun]

That is NOT what the Democrat party told me to think!!!!!! Hour after hour of nothing but what Democrats told you to think

Democrats told me to think nothing.

And you've been doing a real good job at that, Jack!

80+ court cases between the lower courts and Supreme Court tossed

You mean declined, and/or dismissed for late filing, lack of standing and other technical reasons.

told me that judges..you know, the people that actually make decisions everyday saw no evidence of fraud.

How did they know when they never reviewed the evidence, having the cases each only for hours or a few days? And how were all the news outlets reporting it all baseless and debunked on November 6 when the court cases hadn't even been heard yet at that time and it is taking months now just to audit one city in Arizona and the dems want months and months just to "investigate" what happened on 1/6? All your judges really must have been real miracle workers!

You keep repeating the same shit over and over.

Jack, ALL YOU'VE EVER DONE is repeat the same shit over and over, which is to say or offer NOTHING BUT BULL.

So when you gonna start that discussion on election fraud? Are we we taking bets on how many posts it will take before you give it up?
Over 50+ court cases were dismissed for LACK OF EVIDENCE. Why is it you have to be told this over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

And for the record, I don't care about a 1/6 investigation. I'll settle for releasing the names of the Republican Senators and Congresspeople who aided the rioters in the days leading up to 1/6 with logistics, guided tours, and encouragement. Their texts, their emails, their social media correspondence. Release the names and the correspondence. I'll be happy with that.

That's a lie. The courts did not hear the merits of the cases, they made them go away on technicalities.

Jack hangs desperately onto that lie despite being proven wrong time and again.

HE IGNORES the roughly 80 people and organizations who have already admitted to stealing the election to stop a Trump reelection.

HE IGNORES the fact that people were making his argument time and again long before any of the cases went to trial!

HE IGNORED the fact that they keep changing the numbers: his link claims 50 cases while he claims over 80!

HE IGNORED the fact the Reuters lies saying: "the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.” When we all know the cases HAD to focus on smaller complaints that were within the purview of any given courts jurisdiction because no single court has jurisdiction across all six states! He ignores that you don't bring fraud charges because fraud proper is near impossible to prove. He ignores that even his own article says they were "largely" dismissed, meaning not all. He IGNORED the fact that no one goes to court without evidence, at best, a judge might rule that the evidence presented didn't meet the conditions necessary to prove the charges.

Jack IGNORES the fact that Reuters DID NO FACT CHECKING but are merely regurgitating what 3rd parties told them, parties with an interest in the OUTCOME of the election.

Jack IGNORES the fact that all this has been proven him before.

And Jack IGNORED the lengthy documentation I've presented here in Michigan alone claiming I've offered nothing despite my linking him to it on several occasions.

And despite no evidence to the contrary, no ability to show how, when or by who all of the evidence has been "debunked," Jack makes the same lame accusations over and over yet fails to provide ANYTHING to support his accusations other than the words of third parties.

Taken together, all of this combines circumstantially to show that Jack is lying and KNOWS he is lying.

No one has admitted to stealing any election.

Get your fat head out of your puckered, lying ass. Time Magazine published the names back in February.

There were over 50 cases that judges dismissed on the evidence..or lack thereof.

So Trump won 30 cases?

You've presented nothing but conspiracy theories about Michigan.

Your hollow claim. Prove it.

Put up. Or STFU. Be a man. Start your thread and let's go.

Jack, the point of my thread is to compile and weigh the available evidence. Not decide the outcome. You better hope you have lots of documentation to counter it because otherwise, when I do my massive thread, probably the most massive undertaking in the history of USMB, I can tell you already that without proof to the contrary, Trump will win the thread hands down.

Get to work. You should be happy I'm giving you added time.

Then...start it. Or close it.

Eat shit and die, Jack. You sure are in a hurry to see a thread start you have no hope of ever disproving or believing.

I don't even need to break a sweat to kill your thread in less than 20 posts.
I'm ready when you are. Put up. Or shut up. It's easy. You think you have a winning hand. Play it.
I have the feeling..you're bluffing.

He has nothing or he would have started the thread.

 

[Faun]

Robert Byrd admitted he was in the KKK

An renounce his affiliation about the time Ike was elected President.

David duke did the same thing.

The GOP rejected duke, awarding him precisely zero delegates in 1992, and then not allowing him entry into the convention.


The Dems embraced the sheety cyclops, promoted him, cherished him, and let him speak at the convention.


Here you are democrats. We all know we are not racists here. Let's welcome Ku klux klan enchanted cyclops

Robert Byrd


Cheers erupt, standing ovation.....

Democrats were the racist party of segregation at the time. He was from Virginia.

It's it funny how all the Northern States flipped to the Democrat "racist party of segregation." You morons always pretend the South left. Actually the north joined. The south had almost all the seats before the Democrats started turning socialist. Then the south left

Except the part in history, you must missed, when the Democrats in the North teamed up the the Republican in the North and they pass that Civil Rights bill in 1964. Sort of like the second coming of the Civil War. And the Democrats became the Big Tent inclusive party. They still let their Southern Cousins in until the Southern population were convinced that the GOP was the party that would up hold their "traditional values".

Then the left Republicans in the North became Democrats joining the racists in the South. Funny how they did that. What are now the Democrat States specifically went out and joined the racists. They knew what they were. Then you have a racist President as head of your party today and you still believe blacks are your property as any black who tries to leave the Democrat party immediately learns that lynching has not gone away, it's just gone high tech

Ah the history of things that never happened.

And yet anyone who looks up that the North was Republican in the 1950s then all those States flipped to Democrat is undisputable.

Democrats lying, it's what you do

Hey dude… the racist south… in now Republican

Interesting fact. Most of the people who voted in the 50s are dead. Didn't know that, huh? What's it like being stupid?

Today racists vote Democrat. Oh yeah, that's the same ...

Which has nothing to do with the racist south, which was one a Democratic stronghold, is now mostly Republican.

 

[lennypartiv]

They think the fraud is obvious because of some unverified claims that have been made in the internet. Surveillance video that they’ve been told is fraud even though you can’t tell what’s going on, and because when Trump says something they believe it.

You don't know what fraud they have found because you only tune into the liberal news channels. You'd know the truth if you watched Fox News.

 

[Lesh]

They think the fraud is obvious because of some unverified claims that have been made in the internet. Surveillance video that they’ve been told is fraud even though you can’t tell what’s going on, and because when Trump says something they believe it.

You don't know what fraud they have found because you only tune into the liberal news channels. You'd know the truth if you watched Fox News.

Jesus

Did you really just say that?

 

[Slade3200]

They think the fraud is obvious because of some unverified claims that have been made in the internet. Surveillance video that they’ve been told is fraud even though you can’t tell what’s going on, and because when Trump says something they believe it.

You don't know what fraud they have found because you only tune into the liberal news channels. You'd know the truth if you watched Fox News.

I watch Fox more than any other network. I’m well aware of what they are talking about

 

[Mac1958]

You'd know the truth if you watched Fox News.

 

[Mac1958]

They think the fraud is obvious because of some unverified claims that have been made in the internet. Surveillance video that they’ve been told is fraud even though you can’t tell what’s going on, and because when Trump says something they believe it.

You don't know what fraud they have found because you only tune into the liberal news channels. You'd know the truth if you watched Fox News.

Jesus

Did you really just say that?

Yeah. You want to laugh, but....

 

[lennypartiv]

You don't know what fraud they have found because you only tune into the liberal news channels. You'd know the truth if you watched Fox News.

I watch Fox more than any other network. I’m well aware of what they are talking about

It's hard to believe you watch Tucker Carlson and still don't know the truth.

 

[Mac1958]

It's hard to believe you watch Tucker Carlson and still don't know the truth.

My goodness.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

That is NOT what the Democrat party told me to think!!!!!! Hour after hour of nothing but what Democrats told you to think

Democrats told me to think nothing.

And you've been doing a real good job at that, Jack!

80+ court cases between the lower courts and Supreme Court tossed

You mean declined, and/or dismissed for late filing, lack of standing and other technical reasons.

told me that judges..you know, the people that actually make decisions everyday saw no evidence of fraud.

How did they know when they never reviewed the evidence, having the cases each only for hours or a few days? And how were all the news outlets reporting it all baseless and debunked on November 6 when the court cases hadn't even been heard yet at that time and it is taking months now just to audit one city in Arizona and the dems want months and months just to "investigate" what happened on 1/6? All your judges really must have been real miracle workers!

You keep repeating the same shit over and over.

Jack, ALL YOU'VE EVER DONE is repeat the same shit over and over, which is to say or offer NOTHING BUT BULL.

So when you gonna start that discussion on election fraud? Are we we taking bets on how many posts it will take before you give it up?
Over 50+ court cases were dismissed for LACK OF EVIDENCE. Why is it you have to be told this over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

And for the record, I don't care about a 1/6 investigation. I'll settle for releasing the names of the Republican Senators and Congresspeople who aided the rioters in the days leading up to 1/6 with logistics, guided tours, and encouragement. Their texts, their emails, their social media correspondence. Release the names and the correspondence. I'll be happy with that.

That's a lie. The courts did not hear the merits of the cases, they made them go away on technicalities.

Jack hangs desperately onto that lie despite being proven wrong time and again.

HE IGNORES the roughly 80 people and organizations who have already admitted to stealing the election to stop a Trump reelection.

HE IGNORES the fact that people were making his argument time and again long before any of the cases went to trial!

HE IGNORED the fact that they keep changing the numbers: his link claims 50 cases while he claims over 80!

HE IGNORED the fact the Reuters lies saying: "the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.” When we all know the cases HAD to focus on smaller complaints that were within the purview of any given courts jurisdiction because no single court has jurisdiction across all six states! He ignores that you don't bring fraud charges because fraud proper is near impossible to prove. He ignores that even his own article says they were "largely" dismissed, meaning not all. He IGNORED the fact that no one goes to court without evidence, at best, a judge might rule that the evidence presented didn't meet the conditions necessary to prove the charges.

Jack IGNORES the fact that Reuters DID NO FACT CHECKING but are merely regurgitating what 3rd parties told them, parties with an interest in the OUTCOME of the election.

Jack IGNORES the fact that all this has been proven him before.

And Jack IGNORED the lengthy documentation I've presented here in Michigan alone claiming I've offered nothing despite my linking him to it on several occasions.

And despite no evidence to the contrary, no ability to show how, when or by who all of the evidence has been "debunked," Jack makes the same lame accusations over and over yet fails to provide ANYTHING to support his accusations other than the words of third parties.

Taken together, all of this combines circumstantially to show that Jack is lying and KNOWS he is lying.

No one has admitted to stealing any election.

Get your fat head out of your puckered, lying ass. Time Magazine published the names back in February.

There were over 50 cases that judges dismissed on the evidence..or lack thereof.

So Trump won 30 cases?

You've presented nothing but conspiracy theories about Michigan.

Your hollow claim. Prove it.

Put up. Or STFU. Be a man. Start your thread and let's go.

Jack, the point of my thread is to compile and weigh the available evidence. Not decide the outcome. You better hope you have lots of documentation to counter it because otherwise, when I do my massive thread, probably the most massive undertaking in the history of USMB, I can tell you already that without proof to the contrary, Trump will win the thread hands down.

Get to work. You should be happy I'm giving you added time.

Then...start it. Or close it.

Eat shit and die, Jack. You sure are in a hurry to see a thread start you have no hope of ever disproving or believing.

So Freaky. Let me give you a taste of what you are in for when you bravely start your thread on massive voter fraud. This one's for free.

Michigan GOP investigation finds no evidence of widespread fraud in 2020 election

A Republican-led investigation concluded Wednesday that there was "no evidence of widespread or systematic fraud" in Michigan's 2020 election, rejecting claims by former President Donald Trump and his allies that the state's election results were fraudulent.

www.cnn.com

 

[Lesh]

The Senate committee, led by Republicans, debunked claims that deceased people or non-residents voted in the election, voting tabulators were compromised, ballots were harvested, ballots were "dumped" at the TCF Center in Detroit, and votes for Trump in Antrim County were switched.
According to the report, there were two cases in Wayne County where an individual appeared to have voted but was deceased. One was a clerical error in which a 118-year-old man shared an identical name with his son. The other was a 92-year-old woman who died days before the election.
Claims that people who were no longer Michigan residents but voted in the state elections also proved to be false, the committee said.
The committee said that there was no evidence that thousands of absentee voter ballots were mailed out without having been requested, adding that people who made these claims were equating absentee ballot applications with actual absentee ballots.

 

[Lastamender]

That is NOT what the Democrat party told me to think!!!!!! Hour after hour of nothing but what Democrats told you to think

Democrats told me to think nothing.

And you've been doing a real good job at that, Jack!

80+ court cases between the lower courts and Supreme Court tossed

You mean declined, and/or dismissed for late filing, lack of standing and other technical reasons.

told me that judges..you know, the people that actually make decisions everyday saw no evidence of fraud.

How did they know when they never reviewed the evidence, having the cases each only for hours or a few days? And how were all the news outlets reporting it all baseless and debunked on November 6 when the court cases hadn't even been heard yet at that time and it is taking months now just to audit one city in Arizona and the dems want months and months just to "investigate" what happened on 1/6? All your judges really must have been real miracle workers!

You keep repeating the same shit over and over.

Jack, ALL YOU'VE EVER DONE is repeat the same shit over and over, which is to say or offer NOTHING BUT BULL.

So when you gonna start that discussion on election fraud? Are we we taking bets on how many posts it will take before you give it up?
Over 50+ court cases were dismissed for LACK OF EVIDENCE. Why is it you have to be told this over and over?

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

And for the record, I don't care about a 1/6 investigation. I'll settle for releasing the names of the Republican Senators and Congresspeople who aided the rioters in the days leading up to 1/6 with logistics, guided tours, and encouragement. Their texts, their emails, their social media correspondence. Release the names and the correspondence. I'll be happy with that.

That's a lie. The courts did not hear the merits of the cases, they made them go away on technicalities.

Jack hangs desperately onto that lie despite being proven wrong time and again.

HE IGNORES the roughly 80 people and organizations who have already admitted to stealing the election to stop a Trump reelection.

HE IGNORES the fact that people were making his argument time and again long before any of the cases went to trial!

HE IGNORED the fact that they keep changing the numbers: his link claims 50 cases while he claims over 80!

HE IGNORED the fact the Reuters lies saying: "the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.” When we all know the cases HAD to focus on smaller complaints that were within the purview of any given courts jurisdiction because no single court has jurisdiction across all six states! He ignores that you don't bring fraud charges because fraud proper is near impossible to prove. He ignores that even his own article says they were "largely" dismissed, meaning not all. He IGNORED the fact that no one goes to court without evidence, at best, a judge might rule that the evidence presented didn't meet the conditions necessary to prove the charges.

Jack IGNORES the fact that Reuters DID NO FACT CHECKING but are merely regurgitating what 3rd parties told them, parties with an interest in the OUTCOME of the election.

Jack IGNORES the fact that all this has been proven him before.

And Jack IGNORED the lengthy documentation I've presented here in Michigan alone claiming I've offered nothing despite my linking him to it on several occasions.

And despite no evidence to the contrary, no ability to show how, when or by who all of the evidence has been "debunked," Jack makes the same lame accusations over and over yet fails to provide ANYTHING to support his accusations other than the words of third parties.

Taken together, all of this combines circumstantially to show that Jack is lying and KNOWS he is lying.

No one has admitted to stealing any election.

Get your fat head out of your puckered, lying ass. Time Magazine published the names back in February.

There were over 50 cases that judges dismissed on the evidence..or lack thereof.

So Trump won 30 cases?

You've presented nothing but conspiracy theories about Michigan.

Your hollow claim. Prove it.

Put up. Or STFU. Be a man. Start your thread and let's go.

Jack, the point of my thread is to compile and weigh the available evidence. Not decide the outcome. You better hope you have lots of documentation to counter it because otherwise, when I do my massive thread, probably the most massive undertaking in the history of USMB, I can tell you already that without proof to the contrary, Trump will win the thread hands down.

Get to work. You should be happy I'm giving you added time.

Then...start it. Or close it.

Eat shit and die, Jack. You sure are in a hurry to see a thread start you have no hope of ever disproving or believing.

So Freaky. Let me give you a taste of what you are in for when you bravely start your thread on massive voter fraud. This one's for free.

Michigan GOP investigation finds no evidence of widespread fraud in 2020 election

A Republican-led investigation concluded Wednesday that there was "no evidence of widespread or systematic fraud" in Michigan's 2020 election, rejecting claims by former President Donald Trump and his allies that the state's election results were fraudulent.

www.cnn.com

Those GOP representatives are serving their last term. There was massive fraud and more corrupt politicians saying there was not only adds to the certainty there was.

 

[Slade3200]

You don't know what fraud they have found because you only tune into the liberal news channels. You'd know the truth if you watched Fox News.

I watch Fox more than any other network. I’m well aware of what they are talking about

It's hard to believe you watch Tucker Carlson and still don't know the truth.

Fox literally said in court that Yuckier does not report the news he is opinion and not responsible for being accurate. The fact you think Tucker is truth really shows how gullible you are. His show was actually pretty good when he first started but now he is just off the rails.... Frothy mouthed rants ands and hysterical shrieks... The dude is losing it.