Trump Has Questions After Thousands of Ineligible Wisconsin Voters FINALLY Removed From Rolls

[The Purge]

Earlier this week, Wisconsin election officials reported that they had removed more than 205,000 voters from the voter rolls “as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date,” according to a report from the Washington Times.




Joe Biden’s state-certified victory in Wisconsin was by just over 20,000 votes. Naturally, Donald Trump is wondering what took so long.

“Wisconsin has just canceled 205,000 voter registrations because they say they could not find the voters,” Trump said in a statement. “Why did they wait until AFTER the election?”

It’s a good question—an important one. And the answer may not be comforting, but it explains a lot. The Wisconsin Elections Commission was sued back in 2019 over alleged violation of Wisconsin state law for failing to deactivate thousands of ineligible voters. The Wisconsin Election Commission was found in contempt by a Wisconsin judge in January 2020 and was ordered to purge the inactive voters from the voters or be fined each day it didn’t. But the Wisconsin Supreme Court chose not to take up the case, meaning the case would be further litigated in lower courts and likely not be resolved until after the 2020 presidential election.
Which is exactly what happened. The commission voted in the summer of 2019 not to deactivate flagged voters until after the statewide election on April 2021—a convenient period of time after the 2020 presidential election. With the help of the state supreme court, they managed to pull off the delay.

“Would this mean that we would have won Wisconsin?” Trump asked.
It’s a good question. And a very much legitimate one. But, while that cannot be proven without a thorough investigation, an investigation might be coming soon.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

------------‐

Removal of ineligible voters from voter rolls AFTER the 2020 election and NOT BEFORE?
This smacks of a 2020 COVER-UP more than anything well-intended.. I mean, OF COURSE IT IS. A feeble attempt at ERASURE OF EVIDENCE OF THE 2020 STEAL.

 

[Moonglow]

Commission officials announced Wednesday that they deactivated 174,307 voter registrations on Saturday because the voters hadn’t cast a ballot in four years and didn’t respond to a mailing. They said they are required by law every two years to identify registered voters who haven’t voted in the previous four years and deactivate them unless they wish to remain registered.

Swing-state Wisconsin removes 205,000 voters from the rolls

Wisconsin elections officials said Wednesday that they have removed more than 205,000 voters from the rolls as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date.

www.washingtontimes.com

Your idea is not even worth considering.

 

[candycorn]

Earlier this week, Wisconsin election officials reported that they had removed more than 205,000 voters from the voter rolls “as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date,” according to a report from the Washington Times.




Joe Biden’s state-certified victory in Wisconsin was by just over 20,000 votes. Naturally, Donald Trump is wondering what took so long.

“Wisconsin has just canceled 205,000 voter registrations because they say they could not find the voters,” Trump said in a statement. “Why did they wait until AFTER the election?”

It’s a good question—an important one. And the answer may not be comforting, but it explains a lot. The Wisconsin Elections Commission was sued back in 2019 over alleged violation of Wisconsin state law for failing to deactivate thousands of ineligible voters. The Wisconsin Election Commission was found in contempt by a Wisconsin judge in January 2020 and was ordered to purge the inactive voters from the voters or be fined each day it didn’t. But the Wisconsin Supreme Court chose not to take up the case, meaning the case would be further litigated in lower courts and likely not be resolved until after the 2020 presidential election.
Which is exactly what happened. The commission voted in the summer of 2019 not to deactivate flagged voters until after the statewide election on April 2021—a convenient period of time after the 2020 presidential election. With the help of the state supreme court, they managed to pull off the delay.

“Would this mean that we would have won Wisconsin?” Trump asked.
It’s a good question. And a very much legitimate one. But, while that cannot be proven without a thorough investigation, an investigation might be coming soon.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

------------‐

Removal of ineligible voters from voter rolls AFTER the 2020 election and NOT BEFORE?
This smacks of a 2020 COVER-UP more than anything well-intended.. I mean, OF COURSE IT IS. A feeble attempt at ERASURE OF EVIDENCE OF THE 2020 STEAL.

The blob could find out a lot if he would read the AP article that states what actually happened.

Here is a link you won't click on....

Election officials deactivate 205K voter registrations

Wisconsin elections officials said Wednesday they have removed more than 205,000 voters from the rolls as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date.

madison.com

So here are cut and pastes from the article itself....

===

So the conservatives did have their day in court...and lost. You'd think they'd be used to it by now. There are no questions that arise from this since it was adjudicated in 2019 apparently. Try again.

 

[Scottish_Brexiteer_UK]

Commission officials announced Wednesday that they deactivated 174,307 voter registrations on Saturday because the voters hadn’t cast a ballot in four years and didn’t respond to a mailing. They said they are required by law every two years to identify registered voters who haven’t voted in the previous four years and deactivate them unless they wish to remain registered.

Swing-state Wisconsin removes 205,000 voters from the rolls

Wisconsin elections officials said Wednesday that they have removed more than 205,000 voters from the rolls as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date.

www.washingtontimes.com

Your idea is not even worth considering.

Thanks for posting this.

This is exactly why I don't have an opinion either way on the 2020 election and the claims from Trump's side that it was stolen.

Sure there's stuff that doesn't add up to me but there's too much fake news from them, including the OP, to convince me of it.

The Devil is always in the detail. Folk should just fuckup and be truthful or at the very least provide the proper context. It's a trust thing.

 

[Winco]

OMG …….. the RWI’s are melting down
It is delicious to watch.
People voted. Trump lost.

You people are constantly embarrassing the great USA

 

[Esdraelon]

The Devil is always in the detail. Folk should just fuckup and be truthful or at the very least provide the proper context. It's a trust thing.

Exactly so... that's why these audits are underway in several of the battleground states where there were huge reports of irregularities and hundreds of sworn testimonies by voters detailing evidence of fraud that was witnessed and attested to under oath on penalty of perjury.
So far we're on track to assess multiple aspects of the counts, the machines that were used, and even some door to door canvassing to document whether or not the ballot that came from said address actually originated at the address and whether the voter whose name was used for the ballot actually lived at that address last November 3rd.

There's another informal "probe" underway and it will be going live next Tuesday -Thursday, August 10, 11, and 12. A U.S. businessman who was/is a staunch Trump supporter is going to make public the live processing of forensic data that was gleaned from the election in multiple states. He has assembled at least 65 cyber-forensic experts to examine the data in an attempt to tease out irregularities or obvious examples of voting that was illegal, or ballots for which there was no chain-of-custody to verify the validity of the voter's identity or their right to vote.
He has opened this process up for our CIA/FBI/DHS, and politicians from Left and Right to take part in this open, transparent examination of the data from 2020.
These rules were not created for the 2020 election. These rules had been established for significant periods of time but the States where these dodgy practices occurred, used the Covid nonsense to ignore all rules and to allow courts or judicial officers within states - for example, a state attorney general or an appeals court judge or state supreme court judge the latitude to simply declare new standards and rules specifically for 2020.

That sounds like a reasonable approach to ensuring "fair" elections during a time of national chaos due to the pandemic. The problem arises from the rules established in our Constitution. Under Article 1, section 4, the authority for determining locations and means as well as times for elections in the states, is the purview of state legislatures. The Federal Congress can make changes but those changes are accomplished not by some last-minute Fiat but by the regular legislative process where laws are created and signed into force by the president.
In NO case where these last-minute changes were rushed through to allow huge numbers of unsolicited ballots to be mailed to "last known addresses", did the Congress in DC follow that format. We saw judges and other state executive officials simply making a ruling without any opportunity for legal review prior to the new rules being used in the 2020 election.

The businessman is a guy named Mike Lindell who has a "pillow company". He has offered a bounty of 5 million dollars to ANYONE who can come forward, analyze the same data that is available for his cyber-forensics team, and PROVE that cheating categorically did not occur.
His website is FRANKSPEECH.com and that link will be the place to view and follow this cyber-symposium. It is to be continuous and completely transparent to the public in the U.S. and abroad. Again, it will be televised non-stop from August 10th through August 12th.

 

[Colin norris]

Earlier this week, Wisconsin election officials reported that they had removed more than 205,000 voters from the voter rolls “as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date,” according to a report from the Washington Times.




Joe Biden’s state-certified victory in Wisconsin was by just over 20,000 votes. Naturally, Donald Trump is wondering what took so long.

“Wisconsin has just canceled 205,000 voter registrations because they say they could not find the voters,” Trump said in a statement. “Why did they wait until AFTER the election?”

It’s a good question—an important one. And the answer may not be comforting, but it explains a lot. The Wisconsin Elections Commission was sued back in 2019 over alleged violation of Wisconsin state law for failing to deactivate thousands of ineligible voters. The Wisconsin Election Commission was found in contempt by a Wisconsin judge in January 2020 and was ordered to purge the inactive voters from the voters or be fined each day it didn’t. But the Wisconsin Supreme Court chose not to take up the case, meaning the case would be further litigated in lower courts and likely not be resolved until after the 2020 presidential election.
Which is exactly what happened. The commission voted in the summer of 2019 not to deactivate flagged voters until after the statewide election on April 2021—a convenient period of time after the 2020 presidential election. With the help of the state supreme court, they managed to pull off the delay.

“Would this mean that we would have won Wisconsin?” Trump asked.
It’s a good question. And a very much legitimate one. But, while that cannot be proven without a thorough investigation, an investigation might be coming soon.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

------------‐

Removal of ineligible voters from voter rolls AFTER the 2020 election and NOT BEFORE?
This smacks of a 2020 COVER-UP more than anything well-intended.. I mean, OF COURSE IT IS. A feeble attempt at ERASURE OF EVIDENCE OF THE 2020 STEAL.

Instead of implying there's another conspiracy agaibst trump, find out if your figures are correct and if that is what it was done for.

Cover up. Here we go again. Poor old donny. The trump defeat syndrome is taking a while to subside.

 

[Esdraelon]

OMG …….. the RWI’s are melting down
It is delicious to watch.
People voted. Trump lost.

You people are constantly embarrassing the great USA

Hey... then now's your time to humiliate Trump supporters by watching this cyber-symposium and using the facts in evidence to show that Joe indeed won in a landslide Remember, August 10,11, and 12. The entire process will be documented visually and non-stop. Let's face it, your party will never admit any wrongdoing regardless of how much evidence may be documented. That's quite alright, though. The forensics will establish HOW the cheating was accomplished and there is plenty of lead-time for Red Legislatures to pass laws to make the means of cheating impossible going forward.

 

[candycorn]

in NO case where these last-minute changes were rushed through to allow huge numbers of unsolicited ballots to be mailed to "last known addresses",

In 7 states; ballots are mailed to every registered voter's last known address. They've done it this way for years. Not once was there any complaints about this process, not once was there ever a cry for an audit for any of these elected officials, not once has anyone questioned the validity of the elections or the legitimacy of the winners.

In the 2020 general election, there were something like 8,000 losers nationwide. Only one is bitching about election fraud. He's done it twice before. In all 3 cases, no proof of any sizeable election fraud were ever brought forward.

 

[schmidlap]

Earlier this week, Wisconsin election officials reported that they had removed more than 205,000 voters from the voter rolls “as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date,” according to a report from the Washington Times.




Joe Biden’s state-certified victory in Wisconsin was by just over 20,000 votes. Naturally, Donald Trump is wondering what took so long.

“Wisconsin has just canceled 205,000 voter registrations because they say they could not find the voters,” Trump said in a statement. “Why did they wait until AFTER the election?”

It’s a good question—an important one. And the answer may not be comforting, but it explains a lot. The Wisconsin Elections Commission was sued back in 2019 over alleged violation of Wisconsin state law for failing to deactivate thousands of ineligible voters. The Wisconsin Election Commission was found in contempt by a Wisconsin judge in January 2020 and was ordered to purge the inactive voters from the voters or be fined each day it didn’t. But the Wisconsin Supreme Court chose not to take up the case, meaning the case would be further litigated in lower courts and likely not be resolved until after the 2020 presidential election.
Which is exactly what happened. The commission voted in the summer of 2019 not to deactivate flagged voters until after the statewide election on April 2021—a convenient period of time after the 2020 presidential election. With the help of the state supreme court, they managed to pull off the delay.

“Would this mean that we would have won Wisconsin?” Trump asked.
It’s a good question. And a very much legitimate one. But, while that cannot be proven without a thorough investigation, an investigation might be coming soon.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

------------‐

Removal of ineligible voters from voter rolls AFTER the 2020 election and NOT BEFORE?
This smacks of a 2020 COVER-UP more than anything well-intended.. I mean, OF COURSE IT IS. A feeble attempt at ERASURE OF EVIDENCE OF THE 2020 STEAL.

These ideological propaganda sites will persist in churning out this sort of scatalogical fare, amply seasoned with paranoidal delusions, as long as there are those who gorge themselves on it.

There is no accounting for taste.

Fact check: That spike in the Wisconsin vote tally was expected and legitimate, not fraud​

Fact check: That spike in the Wisconsin vote tally was expected and legitimate, not fraud

An overnight spike in the Wisconsin vote tally drew baseless claims of fraud, That's simply when Milwaukee votes were counted

www.usatoday.com

​

Wisconsin vote surge was not fraud​

Wisconsin vote surge was not fraud

Online claims that votes were fraudulently added to Joe Biden’s tally in the battleground of Wisconsin relied on a graph that showed a vertical jump for the Democrat. This is misleading; the rise came from a count of absentee ballots from the mostly Democratic city of Milwaukee, and also gave...

factcheck.afp.com

​

Fact check: Wisconsin did not have more votes than people registered​

Fact check: Wisconsin did not have more votes than people registered

Social media users have been sharing a Twitter screenshot that claims Wisconsin had more people who voted in the 2020 presidential election than number of people registered to vote and say this is evidence fraud took place. This claim is false as the presented number of...

www.reuters.com

​

Viral Posts Misreport Data on Registered Voters in Wisconsin​

Viral Posts Misreport Data on Registered Voters in Wisconsin - FactCheck.org

Viral posts on Facebook falsely claim there were more votes cast in the 2020 election in Wisconsin than there were registered voters. According to state data, the number of registered voters exceeded the votes cast by nearly 388,000, as of Nov. 1.

www.factcheck.org

​

Debunking Trump Tweets: Biden's 143K Vote 'Dump' in Wisconsin​

Debunking Trump Tweets: Biden's 143K Vote 'Dump' in Wisconsin

Voting spikes did occur in Wisconsin and other states as ballots were being counted, but for ordinary and predictable reasons.

www.snopes.com

Trumpy fake claims are laughable as legal challenges, because there is no credible evidence for them.

The Loser's phony claims are airy-fairy pr, calculated to prey on emotion, not reason.

 

[The Purge]

The blob could find out a lot if he would read the AP article that states what actually happened.

Here is a link you won't click on....

Election officials deactivate 205K voter registrations

Wisconsin elections officials said Wednesday they have removed more than 205,000 voters from the rolls as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date.

madison.com

So here are cut and pastes from the article itself....

View attachment 523029

View attachment 523030

===

So the conservatives did have their day in court...and lost. You'd think they'd be used to it by now. There are no questions that arise from this since it was adjudicated in 2019 apparently. Try again.

ROTFLMFAO....A LEFTIST AP ARTICLE...

 

[candycorn]

ROTFLMFAO....A LEFTIST AP ARTICLE...

I'm sorry your OP was destroyed so easily. You should try harder little boy.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Commission officials announced Wednesday that they deactivated 174,307 voter registrations on Saturday because the voters hadn’t cast a ballot in four years and didn’t respond to a mailing. They said they are required by law every two years to identify registered voters who haven’t voted in the previous four years and deactivate them unless they wish to remain registered.

Swing-state Wisconsin removes 205,000 voters from the rolls

Wisconsin elections officials said Wednesday that they have removed more than 205,000 voters from the rolls as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date.

www.washingtontimes.com

Your idea is not even worth considering.

Which left another 31,000 Voters who Apparently DID VOTE or they would have been removed as part of the 174,307 who hadn't voted and were removed. So lets back the fuck up and explain where the 205000 number came from to begin with. The 205,000 was a group of voters suspected of having moved. Of those 205,000 your 174,307 didn't vote so were erased BUT the other 31,000 VOTED but were still removed from the rolls after a postcard was sent to them all asking for confirmation.

The question then is of the 31,000 who VOTED how many were illegal votes done after they had moved? Or how many of the 31,000 who voted didn't know that someone was voting for them. Florida is filled with a bunch of Wisconsin license plates...

This is why they a forescenic audit that goes back and tracks down those who voted.....and this why the dems are shitting themselves.

 

[d0gbreath]

Which left another 31,000 Voters who Apparently DID VOTE or they would have been removed as part of the 174,307 who hadn't voted and were removed. So lets back the fuck up and explain where the 205000 number came from to begin with. The 205,000 was a group of voters suspected of having moved. Of those 205,000 your 174,307 didn't vote so were erased BUT the other 31,000 VOTED but were still removed from the rolls after a postcard was sent to them all asking for confirmation.

The question then is of the 31,000 who VOTED how many were illegal votes done after they had moved? Or how many of the 31,000 who voted didn't know that someone was voting for them. Florida is filled with a bunch of Wisconsin license plates...

This is why they a forescenic audit that goes back and tracks down those who voted.....and this why the dems are shitting themselves.

I'm not shitting myself. Even if you absolutely proved that Donald won all of the swing states, it wouldn't change anything at all. Bear that cross.

 

[otto105]

Earlier this week, Wisconsin election officials reported that they had removed more than 205,000 voters from the voter rolls “as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date,” according to a report from the Washington Times.




Joe Biden’s state-certified victory in Wisconsin was by just over 20,000 votes. Naturally, Donald Trump is wondering what took so long.

“Wisconsin has just canceled 205,000 voter registrations because they say they could not find the voters,” Trump said in a statement. “Why did they wait until AFTER the election?”

It’s a good question—an important one. And the answer may not be comforting, but it explains a lot. The Wisconsin Elections Commission was sued back in 2019 over alleged violation of Wisconsin state law for failing to deactivate thousands of ineligible voters. The Wisconsin Election Commission was found in contempt by a Wisconsin judge in January 2020 and was ordered to purge the inactive voters from the voters or be fined each day it didn’t. But the Wisconsin Supreme Court chose not to take up the case, meaning the case would be further litigated in lower courts and likely not be resolved until after the 2020 presidential election.
Which is exactly what happened. The commission voted in the summer of 2019 not to deactivate flagged voters until after the statewide election on April 2021—a convenient period of time after the 2020 presidential election. With the help of the state supreme court, they managed to pull off the delay.

“Would this mean that we would have won Wisconsin?” Trump asked.
It’s a good question. And a very much legitimate one. But, while that cannot be proven without a thorough investigation, an investigation might be coming soon.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

------------‐

Removal of ineligible voters from voter rolls AFTER the 2020 election and NOT BEFORE?
This smacks of a 2020 COVER-UP more than anything well-intended.. I mean, OF COURSE IT IS. A feeble attempt at ERASURE OF EVIDENCE OF THE 2020 STEAL.

It proves nothing in regard to the 2020 election.

 

[Turtlesoup]

I'm not shitting myself. Even if you absolutely proved that Donald won all of the swing states, it wouldn't change anything at all. Bear that cross.

Yep as I have realized....libs/communist cheat and don't expect that anyone will do anything to them for it.......

 

[otto105]

Exactly so... that's why these audits are underway in several of the battleground states where there were huge reports of irregularities and hundreds of sworn testimonies by voters detailing evidence of fraud that was witnessed and attested to under oath on penalty of perjury.
So far we're on track to assess multiple aspects of the counts, the machines that were used, and even some door to door canvassing to document whether or not the ballot that came from said address actually originated at the address and whether the voter whose name was used for the ballot actually lived at that address last November 3rd.

There's another informal "probe" underway and it will be going live next Tuesday -Thursday, August 10, 11, and 12. A U.S. businessman who was/is a staunch Trump supporter is going to make public the live processing of forensic data that was gleaned from the election in multiple states. He has assembled at least 65 cyber-forensic experts to examine the data in an attempt to tease out irregularities or obvious examples of voting that was illegal, or ballots for which there was no chain-of-custody to verify the validity of the voter's identity or their right to vote.
He has opened this process up for our CIA/FBI/DHS, and politicians from Left and Right to take part in this open, transparent examination of the data from 2020.
These rules were not created for the 2020 election. These rules had been established for significant periods of time but the States where these dodgy practices occurred, used the Covid nonsense to ignore all rules and to allow courts or judicial officers within states - for example, a state attorney general or an appeals court judge or state supreme court judge the latitude to simply declare new standards and rules specifically for 2020.

That sounds like a reasonable approach to ensuring "fair" elections during a time of national chaos due to the pandemic. The problem arises from the rules established in our Constitution. Under Article 1, section 4, the authority for determining locations and means as well as times for elections in the states, is the purview of state legislatures. The Federal Congress can make changes but those changes are accomplished not by some last-minute Fiat but by the regular legislative process where laws are created and signed into force by the president.
In NO case where these last-minute changes were rushed through to allow huge numbers of unsolicited ballots to be mailed to "last known addresses", did the Congress in DC follow that format. We saw judges and other state executive officials simply making a ruling without any opportunity for legal review prior to the new rules being used in the 2020 election.

The businessman is a guy named Mike Lindell who has a "pillow company". He has offered a bounty of 5 million dollars to ANYONE who can come forward, analyze the same data that is available for his cyber-forensics team, and PROVE that cheating categorically did not occur.
His website is FRANKSPEECH.com and that link will be the place to view and follow this cyber-symposium. It is to be continuous and completely transparent to the public in the U.S. and abroad. Again, it will be televised non-stop from August 10th through August 12th.

And it turned into a shitshow.

 

[justoffal]

Earlier this week, Wisconsin election officials reported that they had removed more than 205,000 voters from the voter rolls “as part of routine work to keep the state’s registration lists up to date,” according to a report from the Washington Times.




Joe Biden’s state-certified victory in Wisconsin was by just over 20,000 votes. Naturally, Donald Trump is wondering what took so long.

“Wisconsin has just canceled 205,000 voter registrations because they say they could not find the voters,” Trump said in a statement. “Why did they wait until AFTER the election?”

It’s a good question—an important one. And the answer may not be comforting, but it explains a lot. The Wisconsin Elections Commission was sued back in 2019 over alleged violation of Wisconsin state law for failing to deactivate thousands of ineligible voters. The Wisconsin Election Commission was found in contempt by a Wisconsin judge in January 2020 and was ordered to purge the inactive voters from the voters or be fined each day it didn’t. But the Wisconsin Supreme Court chose not to take up the case, meaning the case would be further litigated in lower courts and likely not be resolved until after the 2020 presidential election.
Which is exactly what happened. The commission voted in the summer of 2019 not to deactivate flagged voters until after the statewide election on April 2021—a convenient period of time after the 2020 presidential election. With the help of the state supreme court, they managed to pull off the delay.

“Would this mean that we would have won Wisconsin?” Trump asked.
It’s a good question. And a very much legitimate one. But, while that cannot be proven without a thorough investigation, an investigation might be coming soon.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...

------------‐

Removal of ineligible voters from voter rolls AFTER the 2020 election and NOT BEFORE?
This smacks of a 2020 COVER-UP more than anything well-intended.. I mean, OF COURSE IT IS. A feeble attempt at ERASURE OF EVIDENCE OF THE 2020 STEAL.

Yet another case of an unelected official making a decision that affects an election according to his or her political predilections.The Federal Bench is no longer a neutral Magistrate it has become a deeply divided and politicized body.

 

[Samofvt]

So before the deletion, Wisconsin had a HUGE turnout of well over 80% of all registered voters. That percentage includes these that were deleted.

Did Wisconsin really have a 90% turnout of all registered voters? Unbelievable display of patriotism, simply Unbelievable.

 

[Quasar44]

I guarantee you that the fake rhino conservatives were all in on the fix