Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In short, get rid of government universities and government funding of universities.A recent poll (guvpoll) has shown that 70% of millennials want a socialist government and 30% want a communist government. Personally, I think the poll is a bit skewed, as there are also a good number of millennials that are pro-republican. Just the same, the only way to counteract this brainwashing of students is to get rid of pro-communist/socialist instructors, as well as get rid of such classes as "gender studies," in favor of pushing for more in the way of school/university credits towards business and science cores.GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP!
GOD BLESS ALL PATRIOTS!!!!![]()
LOLPoor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.t
An innocent man does not block witnesses that can prove his innocence. Your excuses don't work.
Sorry, YOUR side has to "prove" his guilt.![]()
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.
LOLOL^^^ another idiot who thinks Bill Clinton is innocent of lying under oath.Again, he was found "not guilty," not "innocent."OK, we're getting somewhere.
Based on the question Senators voted 47 - guilty, and 53 - not guilty, and Roberts confirmed the count.
According to your logic, he should have said... Senator votes are: 47 - not innocent, 53 - innocent?
Come on, stop threading the needle, even you're better than that.
Not guilty means innocent. Watch a trial sometime.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In left wing alternate universe accused means guilty and innocent until proven guilty is a dictatorial doctrine.
![]()
![]()

Imbecile, "nuh-uh" isn't a rebuttal.Of a fair criminal trial, ******* moron.Then why are you and your cronies constantly blubbering about a "fair trial?" Presumption of innocence is one of the critical components of a fair trial.LOLPoor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.![]()
Lie![]()
Presumption of innocence is a bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system...
Asked and answered repeatedly.What crime did he commit?That's also not true. Impeached Trump can still face criminal prosecution over this when he leaves office.The asterisk will denote the day that impeachment become no more significant than a parking ticket.LOLHow so? We knew he was going to be acquitted. He's still forever impeached. His name will always be mentioned along with Johnson, almost impeached Nixon and Clinton when anyone talks about how there's been 3 presidents impeached.
The impeachment that had no more significance that a ticket for jaywalking.
It's an asterisk next to his name for as long as the U.S. is a country.
LOLOL
So you say. Both were found not guilty.
Yet now rightards are trying to say Impeached Trump is innocent but Bill Clinton isn't.
![]()
2 parts to impeachment fucktard. The crime and the removal if necessary. Clinton WAS found GUILTY, 37 dems agreed. Trump was acquitted. Klinton was NOT, he was found guilty. Neither made it to "removal vote",,,, get with it you lying deflecting asshole.
Suck it, Dimwingers. Your clusterfuck has blown up in your faces.
Now it's over, and you are losers.
Of course there was proof of Impeached Trump's crimes. That aside, according to you, "not guilty" equals "innocent." ... Bill Clinton was found "not guilty" of lying under oath... according to you, that means Bill Clinton was innocent.Then he would have been found to be innocent. But he wasn't. He was found to be not guilty.Let's presume that Senator were asked to vote "guilty" or "innocent", what would final verdict be?
According to you yahoos, Bill Clinton was innocent if lying under oath.
Is that really your position??
No, my position is that Senators voted based on question. Again, "not guilty" means - innocent.
Clinton did lie under oath, and Senate's verdict was "not guilty" and he was acquitted.
Voting not guilty, even while lying under oath was proven, speaks more about Senate, than about justice being served. However, his lying under oath did cause him some legal penalties. Unlike Clinton, there was no proof of Trump's "crimes".
Too much fun, and too easy ******* with you imbeciles....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Clinton was found to be not guilty. You yahoos insist "not guilty" means "innocent."
Now you're trying to show that doesn't apply to Clinton.
![]()
Of course there was proof of Impeached Trump's crimes. That aside, according to you, "not guilty" equals "innocent." ... Bill Clinton was found "not guilty" of lying under oath... according to you, that means Bill Clinton was innocent.Then he would have been found to be innocent. But he wasn't. He was found to be not guilty.Let's presume that Senator were asked to vote "guilty" or "innocent", what would final verdict be?
According to you yahoos, Bill Clinton was innocent if lying under oath.
Is that really your position??
No, my position is that Senators voted based on question. Again, "not guilty" means - innocent.
Clinton did lie under oath, and Senate's verdict was "not guilty" and he was acquitted.
Voting not guilty, even while lying under oath was proven, speaks more about Senate, than about justice being served. However, his lying under oath did cause him some legal penalties. Unlike Clinton, there was no proof of Trump's "crimes".
Too much fun, and too easy ******* with you imbeciles....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Clinton was found to be not guilty. You yahoos insist "not guilty" means "innocent."
Now you're trying to show that doesn't apply to Clinton.
![]()
That's like saying I am guilty in a trial for refusing to talk to cops. Ridiculous...
Trump had nothing to prove, it was the job of the democrats to prove him guilty. They failed...
Nope it's not. If you were requested subpoenaed by the court and refused you go to jail. If you are being investigated for a crime and tell all witnesses not to testify and you defy court orders to turn over documents you go to jail. Trump did both. He did have something to prove. He refused to do so. He blocked witnesses and documents critical to the case and that's because doing so would have proven his guilt. trump is guilty. Your argument is a load o9f crap. Furthermore, you know he is guilty.
They held the trial according to the rules.
Trump was acquitted.
You lost, Trump won.
trump is guilty. You can make all the excuses you want to rationalize this joke of a trial because you're a republican, but trump is guilty. I lost nothing. But we all lost because trump still has a job.
You just contradicted yourself.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know your ***** ass wants to argue semantics just because I said Iost nothing then said we all lost. That shows what kind of child your ass is mentally. I lost nothing. We all lost.
^^^ another idiot who thinks Bill Clinton is innocent of lying under oath.Again, he was found "not guilty," not "innocent."OK, we're getting somewhere.
Based on the question Senators voted 47 - guilty, and 53 - not guilty, and Roberts confirmed the count.
According to your logic, he should have said... Senator votes are: 47 - not innocent, 53 - innocent?
Come on, stop threading the needle, even you're better than that.
Not guilty means innocent. Watch a trial sometime.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In left wing alternate universe accused means guilty and innocent until proven guilty is a dictatorial doctrine.
![]()
![]()
What crime did he commit?That's also not true. Impeached Trump can still face criminal prosecution over this when he leaves office.The asterisk will denote the day that impeachment become no more significant than a parking ticket.LOLHow so? We knew he was going to be acquitted. He's still forever impeached. His name will always be mentioned along with Johnson, almost impeached Nixon and Clinton when anyone talks about how there's been 3 presidents impeached.
The impeachment that had no more significance that a ticket for jaywalking.
It's an asterisk next to his name for as long as the U.S. is a country.
LOLOL^^^ another idiot who thinks Bill Clinton is innocent of lying under oath.Again, he was found "not guilty," not "innocent."
Not guilty means innocent. Watch a trial sometime.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In left wing alternate universe accused means guilty and innocent until proven guilty is a dictatorial doctrine.
![]()
![]()
So you say. Both were found not guilty.
Yet now rightards are trying to say Impeached Trump is innocent but Bill Clinton isn't.
![]()
Of course there was proof of Impeached Trump's crimes. That aside, according to you, "not guilty" equals "innocent." ... Bill Clinton was found "not guilty" of lying under oath... according to you, that means Bill Clinton was innocent.Then he would have been found to be innocent. But he wasn't. He was found to be not guilty.
According to you yahoos, Bill Clinton was innocent if lying under oath.
Is that really your position??
No, my position is that Senators voted based on question. Again, "not guilty" means - innocent.
Clinton did lie under oath, and Senate's verdict was "not guilty" and he was acquitted.
Voting not guilty, even while lying under oath was proven, speaks more about Senate, than about justice being served. However, his lying under oath did cause him some legal penalties. Unlike Clinton, there was no proof of Trump's "crimes".
Too much fun, and too easy ******* with you imbeciles....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Clinton was found to be not guilty. You yahoos insist "not guilty" means "innocent."
Now you're trying to show that doesn't apply to Clinton.
![]()
The right wing double standard.
End funding for those that support the ideology.In short, get rid of government universities and government funding of universities.A recent poll (guvpoll) has shown that 70% of millennials want a socialist government and 30% want a communist government. Personally, I think the poll is a bit skewed, as there are also a good number of millennials that are pro-republican. Just the same, the only way to counteract this brainwashing of students is to get rid of pro-communist/socialist instructors, as well as get rid of such classes as "gender studies," in favor of pushing for more in the way of school/university credits towards business and science cores.GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP!
GOD BLESS ALL PATRIOTS!!!!![]()
LOLLOLPoor dumbfuck ^^^ can't post without lying. In reality, I actually said Impeached Trump was not guilty until proven innocent.Faun thinks you are guilty until proven innocent. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't apply to impeachments.Sorry, YOUR side has to "prove" his guilt.![]()
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Poor stupid little yellow coward. Hey asshole, in this country one does not have to prove innocence. Burden of proof is on YOU dumbestfuck. Keep showing how dumb you are. Slapping you is so easy.
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.
Amen yet you still have to prove your charges as you continually claim this is a trial that needed witnesses. Thus yes, there is ALWAYS presumption of innocence you uneducated eunuch. Keep showing how totally stupid you are asshole. You are ***** slapped again.
LOLOLImbecile, "nuh-uh" isn't a rebuttal.Of a fair criminal trial, ******* moron.Then why are you and your cronies constantly blubbering about a "fair trial?" Presumption of innocence is one of the critical components of a fair trial.LOL
Yet another dumbfuck who doesn't understand presumption of innocence applies to criminal cases, not political procedures.![]()
Lie![]()
Presumption of innocence is a bedrock principle of the American criminal justice system...
We’ll asswipe, it’s funny how for an impeachment, you are alleging high CRIMES OR MISDEMEANORS. See that word crime moron? ***** slapped yet again.