Here is proof gravity is not space time

Robert W

Don't tread on me. Be kind to our president.
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
36,328
Reaction score
19,077
Points
1,788
Location
Redmond Oregon, USA
Watch these sailors who are deep underwater react to gravity despite the deep ocean shielding them from space time.
To help you understand, bear in mind what space time is defined as being. Watch the sailors lean as the Submarine dives. They are fighting gravity and not space time. By the way, the entire Video is well worth watching. Americas most deadly ship is on display, the USS Kentucky.

 
Watch these sailors who are deep underwater react to gravity despite the deep ocean shielding them from space time

I'm not sure that a few hundred feet of water can isolate a steel tube full of men from space time which extends to every inch of The Universe.

You might fundamentally misunderstand the concept.
 
I'm not sure that a few hundred feet of water can isolate a steel tube full of men from space time which extends to every inch of The Universe.

You might fundamentally misunderstand the concept.

The idea that space-time exists is no more viable than the outdated belief that the celestial sphere exists: both are observer-centred models that are powerful and convenient for describing the world, but neither represents reality itself.
 
Watch these sailors who are deep underwater react to gravity despite the deep ocean shielding them from space time.
To help you understand, bear in mind what space time is defined as being. Watch the sailors lean as the Submarine dives. They are fighting gravity and not space time. By the way, the entire Video is well worth watching. Americas most deadly ship is on display, the USS Kentucky.


Man, I've been fighting me some AI on this subject off and on for days now, and as of right now, I'm convinced it (time space) is just another "chicken and egg" phenomenon.

Semantics even.

As I understand it, everything that exists has inertia (even energy) and everything is traveling through time - even if it doesn't appear to be physically moving.

Huge amounts of mass can effectively warp or bend time and space around them, as even an atom has that as a characteristic. So more atoms mean more mass, and the warping is accumulative.

When an object in space is nowhere near any mass, it is what someone (Einstein) decided to call "geodesic." It's still moving through time, even if it isn't physically "moving."

When the object encounters the curved space-time of a large mass or black hole, it simply follows the strongest effect on "time" that it is presented with.

The straightest line between two points is a straight line, and that is the path the object (which appears to be falling) is trying to follow.

There are a lot of other factors that affect the path. Resistance (frictions), etc.

Like I said, it's almost semantics. It looks like the object is being "pulled" to the Earth (example), but the explanation is that the Earth simply warps the time and space around itself, and everything tries to follow that warped time towards the center of the mass.

AI couldn't explain how or why even a single atom has a minuscule effect on space-time, but (LOL) it refuses to see it as "gravity."

A rose by any other name is still a rose.
 
Last edited:
The idea that space-time exists is no more viable than the outdated belief that the celestial sphere exists: both are observer-centred models that are powerful and convenient for describing the world, but neither represents reality itself.
I don't think you got physics in HS or college.
 
I don't think you got physics in HS or college.
I studied physics both places.

1774747786775.webp
 
Man, I've been fighting me some AI on this subject off and on for days now, and as of right now, I'm convinced it (time space) is just another "chicken and egg" phenomenon.

Semantics even.

As I understand it, everything that exists has inertia (even energy) and everything is traveling through time - even if it doesn't appear to be physically moving.

Huge amounts of mass can effectively warp or bend time and space around them, as even an atom has that as a characteristic. So more atoms mean more mass, and the warping is accumulative.

When an object in space is nowhere near any mass, it is what someone (Einstein) decided to call "geodesic." It's still moving through time, even if it isn't physically "moving."

When the object encounters the curved space-time of a large mass or black hole, it simply follows the strongest effect on "time" that it is presented with.

The straightest line between two points is a straight line, and that is the path the object (which appears to be falling) is trying to follow.

There are a lot of other factors that affect the path. Resistance (frictions), etc.

Like I said, it's almost semantics. It looks like the object is being "pulled" to the Earth (example), but the explanation is that the Earth simply warps the time and space around itself, and everything tries to follow that warped time towards the center of the mass.

AI couldn't explain how or why even a single atom has a minuscule effect on space-time, but (LOL) it refuses to see it as "gravity."

A rose by any other name is still a rose.
1774748642685.webp
 

Spacetime is undeniably real but I might argue that the concept of it being three space dimensions and one time dimension might be wrong. I'm of the opinion now that spacetime is really three dimensions of time divided along three separate coordinate systems. Either way, there is no escaping it, if you exist as ordinary fermionic matter, then you are trapped in spacetime.
 
15th post
Watch these sailors who are deep underwater react to gravity despite the deep ocean shielding them from space time.
Is the EARTH FLAT ROBERT?
Or A SPHERE, as most suggest.


We need to know.
ME: No, the Earth is a Sphere.
Robert: ???? Unknown

Agree or Not?

I need to check your dementia LEVEL.
 
Is the EARTH FLAT ROBERT?
Or A SPHERE, as most suggest.


We need to know.
ME: No, the Earth is a Sphere.
Robert: ???? Unknown

Agree or Not?

I need to check your dementia LEVEL.
This is about gravity, what does your comment have to do with gravity?
 
Spacetime is undeniably real but I might argue that the concept of it being three space dimensions and one time dimension might be wrong. I'm of the opinion now that spacetime is really three dimensions of time divided along three separate coordinate systems. Either way, there is no escaping it, if you exist as ordinary fermionic matter, then you are trapped in spacetime.
This is hotly debated by scientists. I am not the only person questioning it.
 
Back
Top Bottom