Wow, what a fascinating link you provided to prove that. That's what I would have said if you'd provided a link, it was fascinating and it proved your claim. Instead, no link, nothing at all but your worthless word
I don't do links, but they've changed their story already.
Some of the information Conley did and did not provide raised even more questions about the President’s health and the timeline of his illness.
time.com
When asked about the timeline of the President’s diagnosis, Conley gave two seemingly disparate time frames.
“Just 72 hours into the diagnosis now, the first week of COVID, in a particular day the first seven to 10 are the most critical in determining the likely course of this illness,” Conley said at the start of the press conference. But when asked shortly afterwards when the President tested positive, Conley said the President was tested Thursday afternoon after learning he had come in close contact with someone who is positive and “clinical indications” that gave the team “a little bit more concern,” and then tested positive late Thursday night.
Hours after the briefing, Conley released a “timeline clarification” saying that he “incorrectly used the term ‘seventy two hours’ instead of ‘day three’ and ‘forty eight hours’ instead of ‘day two’ with regards to [the President’s] diagnosis and the administration of the polyclonal antibody therapy,” adding that “the President was first diagnosed with COVID-19 on the evening of Thursday, Oct. 1 and had received Regeron’s [sic] antibody cocktail on Friday, Oct. 2.”