Trump Demands Supreme Court Rein In Lawless Leftwing Tyrants in Judge's Robes

[DonGlock26]

 

[jc456]

“Heard on Fox”

But wait… no one watches Fox right?

Got something to say about the interference?

 

[Lesh]

How about you check out what Chief Justice Roberts had to say

 

[Orangecat]

Edgetho

Trump controls the DOJ and the FBI and could ignore these liberal judges.

And should. Judges interpret laws and levy sentences. They rely on the executive branch to enforce decisions. If the executive branch finds the judiciary to be compromised/corrupt, it’s their duty to not enforce. Such is the beauty of balances of power.

 

[Lesh]

Edgetho

And should. Judges interpret laws and levy sentences. They rely on the executive branch to enforce decisions. If the executive branch finds the judiciary to be compromised/corrupt, it’s their duty to not enforce. Such is the beauty of balances of power.

It is not in the purview of the Executive to determine that

 

[dudmuck]

Trump controls the DOJ and the FBI and could ignore these liberal judges.

Imagine if last year we said that Biden can ignore conservative judges.

 

[WEATHER53]

Edgetho

And should. Judges interpret laws and levy sentences. They rely on the executive branch to enforce decisions. If the executive branch finds the judiciary to be compromised/corrupt, it’s their duty to not enforce. Such is the beauty of balances of power.

The do not interpret nor alter
They enforce.

 

[Flopper]

This is overdue. If SCOTUS doesn't do something about the lawfare in this Country, we're going to find ourselves without a Judicial System, maybe -- Altogether.

It's all bluff anyway. Courts have no real enforcement authority. They have no Police, no Soldiers no -- Nothing.

Trump could just start ignoring them completely and what are they gonna do about it? Send him a sternly worded letter??

Leftwing hacks have been overstepping their bounds and elevating themselves to Acting President:

Judge blocks Trump from revoking clearances of firm connected to Russia-collusion hoax




Thousands of fired federal workers must be rehired immediately, judge rules









Trump is demanding that the Supreme Court rein in the hacks.

Courts may not have police or soldiers but they do have some tools, the most powerful being the Constitution of the United States which requires that the president follow the rule of law regardless of how holly his quest may be or how strong his mandate from the American people. He has sworn to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. If Trump continues to ignore the courts, it will create a Constitutional crisis, in a battle that he will lose.

 

[Lesh]

The do not interpret nor alter
They enforce.

The Courts??

Ummmm no

 

[Flopper]

Edgetho

And should. Judges interpret laws and levy sentences. They rely on the executive branch to enforce decisions. If the executive branch finds the judiciary to be compromised/corrupt, it’s their duty to not enforce. Such is the beauty of balances of power.

The executive branch does not determine guilt or innocence of a federal judge. That's for Congress to decide.

If a President does not agree with the ruling of a judge, he can not just ignore it and violate the constitution. He can appeal it to a higher court or obey the ruling.

However, we are not talking about just any president, we are talking about Donald Trump who has about as much respect for the Constitution as the New Times that lines his garbage cans.

 

[Orangecat]

It is not in the purview of the Executive to determine that

I highly doubt the Executive gives a shit about your opinion in the matter, Lush.

 

[kyzr]

The executive branch does not determine guilt or innocence of a federal judge. That's for Congress to decide.
If a President does not agree with the ruling of a judge, he can not just ignore it and violate the constitution. He can appeal it to a higher court or obey the ruling.
However, we are not talking about just any president, we are talking about Donald Trump who has about as much respect for the Constitution as the New Times that lines his garbage cans.

1. If a "district" judge tries to make a ruling outside his "district" the president is well within his rights to ignore that illegal court order. That is not unconstitutional, it is using his Article 2 authority, that the district judge cannot overrule.
2. Trump obeys all legitimate court orders.

 

[Lesh]

I highly doubt the Executive gives a shit about your opinion in the matter, Lush.

Show us in the Constitution where supports the Executive branch having that type of control over the judiciary, Jackass.

 

[Lesh]

The executive branch does not determine guilt or innocence of a federal judge. That's for Congress to decide.

If a President does not agree with the ruling of a judge, he can not just ignore it and violate the constitution. He can appeal it to a higher court or obey the ruling.

However, we are not talking about just any president, we are talking about Donald Trump who has about as much respect for the Constitution as the New Times that lines his garbage cans.

As Roberts points out… that is a Constitutional Crisis

 

[Care4all]

1. If a "district" judge tries to make a ruling outside his "district" the president is well within his rights to ignore that illegal court order. That is not unconstitutional, it is using his Article 2 authority, that the district judge cannot overrule.
2. Trump obeys all legitimate court orders.

the Federal judge's district is for locality of cases....federal court cases in this region are brought to that specific DISTRICT'S COURT.

But his rulings, are FEDERAL....which affects the whole country, in unison.....that is how it has always been, thus a federal judge in the federal court system in one of the federal districts, is a federal ruling for the whole country. Rules and laws and the US Constitution does NOT CHANGE with districts, it's simply a means to organize work flow of cases to be reviewed and brought to the Federal court, by regions of proximity.

OF COURSE all the federal cases for the nation are not brought to one single court in one location. Most plaintiffs with family, could not afford to travel.... and to pay their lawyers to travel so far. Thus regional coverage with these location districts, but all for ONE FEDERAL Court.

The district court rulings are Nationwide, not for only one district, just as the highest federal court who may hear one of any district court appeals, the Supreme Court....their rulings for these district cases.... are nationwide.

 

[kyzr]

the Federal judge's district is for locality of cases....federal court cases in this region are brought to that specific DISTRICT'S COURT.

But his rulings, are FEDERAL....which affects the whole country, in unison.....that is how it has always been, thus a federal judge in the federal court system in one of the federal districts, is a federal ruling for the whole country. Rules and laws and the US Constitution does NOT CHANGE with districts, it's simply a means to organize work flow of cases to be reviewed and brought to the Federal court, by regions of proximity.

OF COURSE all the federal cases for the nation are not brought to one single court in one location. Most plaintiffs with family, could not afford to travel.... and to pay their lawyers to travel so far. Thus regional coverage with these location districts, but all for ONE FEDERAL Court.

The district court rulings are Nationwide, not for only one district, just as the highest federal court who may hear one of any district court appeals, the Supreme Court....their rulings for these district cases.... are nationwide.

1. That makes no sense. You are saying that 700 "district" judges can all micromanage the Federal government superseding the president's Article 2 constitutional powers.

2. It may make sense if the president ignores the orders until the Supreme Court confirms the lower court's order.

3. One other interesting point is that the Alien Enemies Act does NOT allow for judicial review, just sayin'

 

[konradv]

This is overdue. If SCOTUS doesn't do something about the lawfare in this Country, we're going to find ourselves without a Judicial System, maybe -- Altogether.

It's all bluff anyway. Courts have no real enforcement authority. They have no Police, no Soldiers no -- Nothing.

Trump could just start ignoring them completely and what are they gonna do about it? Send him a sternly worded letter??

Leftwing hacks have been overstepping their bounds and elevating themselves to Acting President:

Judge blocks Trump from revoking clearances of firm connected to Russia-collusion hoax




Thousands of fired federal workers must be rehired immediately, judge rules









Trump is demanding that the Supreme Court rein in the hacks.

Trump is a fascist and should be impeached and convicted.

 

[Lesh]

1. That makes no sense. You are saying that 700 "district" judges can all micromanage the Federal government superseding the president's Article 2 constitutional powers.

2. It may make sense if the president ignores the orders until the Supreme Court confirms the lower court's order.

3. One other interesting point is that the Alien Enemies Act does NOT allow for judicial review, just sayin'

1. If cases are brought before them , that’s how it works

2. Not how it works. Appeal

3. All laws are subject to being interpreted.

You’re welcome

 

[Orangecat]

Show us in the Constitution where supports the Executive branch having that type of control over the judiciary, Jackass.

Again, I highly doubt the Executive gives a shit about your whining. The Constitution has nothing to do with it.

 

[Lesh]

Again, I highly doubt the Executive gives a shit about your whining. The Constitution has nothing to do with it.

What???

The Constitution has everything to do with it jackass