Trump Demands Supreme Court Rein In Lawless Leftwing Tyrants in Judge's Robes

[j-mac]

You owe it to yourself. If you want to be a coward, that’s your choice.

Coward? lol....Coward to whom? You? You sure are a funny little man....

 

[meaner gene]

Then you have a link for that? or is it TDS spill over cult talk?...

Trump’s final pitch to voters: retribution vows, vulgar rallies, fascist accusations

Former president, who recently called US a ‘a garbage can for the world’, has eyes on revenge in re-election campaign

www.theguardian.com

Sat 26 Oct 2024 12.00 EDT
Trump’s final pitch to voters: retribution vows,

As the election nears, Donald Trump’s final message to voters is about revenge, with promises for retribution

Retribution remains a key theme of the Trump re-election campaign. Trump has vowed to root out “the enemy from within” and said he would consider using the military to go after his political opponents. NPR recently tallied “more than 100 threats to investigate, prosecute, imprison or otherwise punish his perceived opponents” from Trump in the last two years.

 

[skews13]

This is overdue. If SCOTUS doesn't do something about the lawfare in this Country, we're going to find ourselves without a Judicial System, maybe -- Altogether.

It's all bluff anyway. Courts have no real enforcement authority. They have no Police, no Soldiers no -- Nothing.

Trump could just start ignoring them completely and what are they gonna do about it? Send him a sternly worded letter??

Leftwing hacks have been overstepping their bounds and elevating themselves to Acting President:

Judge blocks Trump from revoking clearances of firm connected to Russia-collusion hoax




Thousands of fired federal workers must be rehired immediately, judge rules









Trump is demanding that the Supreme Court rein in the hacks.

Who cares what Trump demands.

He'll have different demands from his prison cell in four years.

 

[j-mac]

Trump’s final pitch to voters: retribution vows, vulgar rallies, fascist accusations

Former president, who recently called US a ‘a garbage can for the world’, has eyes on revenge in re-election campaign

www.theguardian.com

Sat 26 Oct 2024 12.00 EDT
Trump’s final pitch to voters: retribution vows,

As the election nears, Donald Trump’s final message to voters is about revenge, with promises for retribution

Retribution remains a key theme of the Trump re-election campaign. Trump has vowed to root out “the enemy from within” and said he would consider using the military to go after his political opponents. NPR recently tallied “more than 100 threats to investigate, prosecute, imprison or otherwise punish his perceived opponents” from Trump in the last two years.

Wow....Look how easily you swallowed that whole....

 

[meaner gene]

High crimes and/or misdemeanors, impeachment.

Here is a list of federal judges who were impeached.

Impeachments of Federal Judges | Federal Judicial Center

Biographies of judges include birth/death, Article III judicial service, other federal judicial service, education, professional career, research resources, and other information…

www.fjc.gov

Further, it is argued that federal judges can be removed under the “good behavior” clause.

Here is an explanation of that.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artIII-S1-2-1-3/ALDE_00000686/%5B'impeachment'%5D

From cite:

Congress has never removed a federal judge for disagreement with the law’s application or because of difference in political views. Based on this historical practice, the good behavior standard arguably guards against the removal of a federal judge for disagreement with the law’s interpretation or political disagreements.

 

[meaner gene]

Wow....Look how easily you swallowed that whole....

Re: more than 100 threats to investigate, prosecute, imprison or otherwise punish his perceived opponents” from Trump in the last two years.

Add to that the list of prosecutions Trump announced when he visited the Department of Justice a couple of days ago.

 

[j-mac]

From cite:

Congress has never removed a federal judge for disagreement with the law’s application or because of difference in political views. Based on this historical practice, the good behavior standard arguably guards against the removal of a federal judge for disagreement with the law’s interpretation or political disagreements.

Yep, I saw that...But that doesn't mean that there isn't a problem....

There's something going on inside our judiciary, and if we don't get a handle on it, then shame on us...

As someone in here stated in an unrelated topic, "The pendulum always swings"... Are you going to be fine with it if Conservative judges start influencing cases based on their ideological viewpoints? I don't think you will...

 

[Lesh]

Yep, I saw that...But that doesn't mean that there isn't a problem....

There's something going on inside our judiciary, and if we don't get a handle on it, then shame on us...

As someone in here stated in an unrelated topic, "The pendulum always swings"... Are you going to be fine with it if Conservative judges start influencing cases based on their ideological viewpoints? I don't think you will...

Conservative judges already do that

 

[WEATHER53]

Of course there is.

What’s the basis for your opinion that these people should be investigated? All you have is suspicion because judges didn’t rule the way you wanted them to.

Which judge did you vote for in the Presidential election ?

 

[meaner gene]

Yep, I saw that...But that doesn't mean that there isn't a problem....

There's something going on inside our judiciary, and if we don't get a handle on it, then shame on us...

As someone in here stated in an unrelated topic, "The pendulum always swings"... Are you going to be fine with it if Conservative judges start influencing cases based on their ideological viewpoints? I don't think you will...

I had no arguments against Antonin Scalia, and his ability to twist the constitution by coming up with three different definitions of the constitutional definition of "the people".

That aside. My argument isn't in what republican judges do, but in that they lied to the senate during their confirmations.

And lying to congress is certainly impeachable for a judge.

 

[skye]

Exactly right.

 

[j-mac]

I had no arguments against Antonin Scalia, and his ability to twist the constitution by coming up with three different definitions of the constitutional definition of "the people".

That aside. My argument isn't in what republican judges do, but in that they lied to the senate during their confirmations.

And lying to congress is certainly impeachable for a judge.

So, what you are saying is that you're fine with how liberal federal judges were involved in cases against Trump's civil rights, and you're ok with it now that they are acting to thwart the administration.....Is that right?

 

[skye]

Another one

BREAKING: Obama Judge Orders Trump Admin to Turn Around Planes Deporting Venezuelan Gang Members​

BREAKING: Obama Judge Orders Trump Admin to Turn Around Planes Deporting Venezuelan Gang Members | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

A federal judge's recent ruling halts the Trump administration's plan to deport Venezuelan nationals, igniting fierce debate over executive authority and immigration policy amidst pressure from progressive advocacy groups.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Mike Davis said it’s time to ignore these illegal orders and impeach the lawless judges.

It’s time to ignore these illegal orders.

It’s time to impeach these lawless judges.

It’s time to defund these lawless courts.

— Mike Davis (@mrddmia) March 15, 2025

 

[Lesh]

Are we at war with Venezuela?

Then no

 

[j-mac]

Are we at war with Venezuela?

Then no

So, we can only deport illegals back to their home countries if we are at war with them?

Are you brain damaged?

 

[kyzr]

Ignore the communist judges until the USSC makes a call.
Claim Article 2 Powers.

 

[j-mac]

I actually think that the DoJ needs to investigate these judges, and the Congress needs to impeach....

 

[JLW]

More stupidity from the authoritarian right. “Do as I say or face cancellation.” We have a constitution. Unfortunately, the Trumpist right wants to defecate on it in order to get their way. Hopefully, our guardrails will hold or our Constitutional Republic is in serious trouble.

 

[j-mac]

More stupidity from the authoritarian right. “Do as I say or face cancellation.” We have a constitution. Unfortunately, the Trumpist right wants to defecate on it in order to get their way. Hopefully, our guardrails will hold or our Constitutional Republic is in serious trouble.

Don't like when your own tactics are used on you, do you?

 

[Lesh]

So, we can only deport illegals back to their home countries if we are at war with them?

Are you brain damaged?

You can only use this act during war.