Trump Demands Supreme Court Rein In Lawless Leftwing Tyrants in Judge's Robes

[my2¢]

I'm not impressed by most judges appointed by Democrats. However, I consider it the price we pay for living in a constitutional republic and prefer it over government led by an elected leader's temper tantrums.

 

[WEATHER53]

Judicial Review.

They do it all the time.

Nope. Never ever one judge taking it upon himself to set aside a vote in the House or Senate
Never. ever.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Plus, trump has term limits, judges are appointed for life

Maybe the woke lib partisan democrats judges are not taking bribes, which is an impeachable offense, but they are a threat to our democracy through judicial malfeasence

Legislative makes laws, Executive administers them, Judiciary adjudicates them.

Mr. Trump can appeal if he does not like the adjudication.

That's how it works.

 

[Delldude]

They will in 2028.

Have been since 2016.

 

[Crepitus]

 

[Lesh]

Ruling that something is unconstitutional though is not authority over Congress or the Executive Branch. It only advises a responsible Congress and/or Executive Branch that it should change a policy or law. And a corrupt court system should be challenged every time they erroneously declare something is unconstitutional. And a corrupt Democrat Party should not be able to use a corrupt court system to accomplish what they cannot convince Congress to legislate or the President to set as policy.

The courts were never intended to be able to make law. They are given authority to try those who break the law, to mediate disputes and interpret the letter and intent of the law.

That’s batshit crazy.

It’s a RULING

Not an “advisory”

 

[Lesh]

Nope. Never ever one judge taking it upon himself to set aside a vote in the House or Senate
Never. ever.

Courts have that power established in Marbury v Madison and exercised it 176 times

Judicial review in the United States - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Rambunctious]

He does not need a link.

You will find no such campaign ad for that.

You will in 2028.

Link????

 

[Frankenstein]

trump is the only tyrant we have. He loves to blame others for the very things he does.

Go back to clown school, there is no enforcement that these judges can enact.

 

[Frankenstein]

This is overdue. If SCOTUS doesn't do something about the lawfare in this Country, we're going to find ourselves without a Judicial System, maybe -- Altogether.

It's all bluff anyway. Courts have no real enforcement authority. They have no Police, no Soldiers no -- Nothing.

Trump could just start ignoring them completely and what are they gonna do about it? Send him a sternly worded letter??

Leftwing hacks have been overstepping their bounds and elevating themselves to Acting President:

Judge blocks Trump from revoking clearances of firm connected to Russia-collusion hoax




Thousands of fired federal workers must be rehired immediately, judge rules









Trump is demanding that the Supreme Court rein in the hacks.

Investigate these judges and their finances find out who has them in pocket! Most likely marxists and cartels

 

[Lesh]

Investigate these judges and their finances find out who has them in pocket! Most likely marxists and cartels

Basic attack on the judiciary

Despots do that

 

[Frankenstein]

Basic attack on the judiciary

Despots do that

They are over stepping their authority for reason lets find out why

 

[sartre play]

Explain how ONLY ONE political party has dishonest people.?

 

[M14 Shooter]

This is overdue. If SCOTUS doesn't do something about the lawfare in this Country, we're going to find ourselves without a Judicial System, maybe -- Altogether.

It's all bluff anyway. Courts have no real enforcement authority. They have no Police, no Soldiers no -- Nothing.

Trump could just start ignoring them completely and what are they gonna do about it? Send him a sternly worded letter??

Comply and grieve.

Trump knows the appellate courts will take care of at least most of these district court TROs, - the constitutionally-granted power of the President to take action within the Executive Branch is exceptionally broad and impressively strong.

The left, of course, believes that so long as a judge's ruling gets in Trump's way, it is constitutionally sound.

 

[sartre play]

Edgetho

And should. Judges interpret laws and levy sentences. They rely on the executive branch to enforce decisions. If the executive branch finds the judiciary to be compromised/corrupt, it’s their duty to not enforce. Such is the beauty of balances of power.

Would BE TRUE if looking at ALL judges from All party's

 

[Frankenstein]

Would BE TRUE if looking at ALL judges from All party's

I disagree did anyone go to judges when Biden undid Trumps border orders?

 

[Mac-7]

Legislative makes laws, Executive administers them, Judiciary adjudicates them.

Mr. Trump can appeal if he does not like the adjudication.

That's how it works.

We can have bad presidents and bad congresses

Why not bad judges?

 

[Frankenstein]

Legislative makes laws, Executive administers them, Judiciary adjudicates them.

Mr. Trump can appeal if he does not like the adjudication.

That's how it works.

That is President Trump beeeeyotch!

 

[M14 Shooter]

The Court can absolute rule that Executive actions and laws passed by Congress are unconstitutional

Yes, but....
The Courts also have no constitutional authority over either Congress or the Executive Branch
He's talking about the separation of powers.
-The courts cannot force Congress to pass a law, or force the President to approve/veto a law.
-The courts cannot enjoin an order given by the President to the military; the courts cannot order a military unit to... anything.
ad nauseam

 

[sartre play]

We can have bad presidents and bad congresses

Why not bad judges?

Sad to say we have bad people who think Money and Power are more important that a government
THAT works for ALL its people. Not just ANY ONE dam political party.