Trump Demands Supreme Court Rein In Lawless Leftwing Tyrants in Judge's Robes

[Orangecat]

What???

The Constitution has everything to do with it jackass

The Constitution has nothing to do with your whining about this, moron. Suck it up, buttercup, elections have consequences.

 

[Lesh]

The Constitution has nothing to do with your whining about this, moron. Suck it up, buttercup, elections have consequences.

So you’re saying that the Trump election supersedes the Constitution?

 

[Orangecat]

So you’re saying that the Trump election supersedes the Constitution?

I’m saying the Executive branch couldn’t care less about your insipid whining, imbecile.

 

[Delldude]

The Constitution has everything to do with it jackass

Why are these courts putting orders out that many will fail at Scotus then?

If a President does not agree with the ruling of a judge, he can not just ignore it and violate the constitution.

My student loan was forgiven.,

 

[Lesh]

Why are these courts putting orders out that many will fail at Scotus then?


My student loan was forgiven.,

A. Not all courts are as compromised as the SCOTUS

B. On what basis? And stop whining and just say thank you

 

[Foxfyre]

This is overdue. If SCOTUS doesn't do something about the lawfare in this Country, we're going to find ourselves without a Judicial System, maybe -- Altogether.

It's all bluff anyway. Courts have no real enforcement authority. They have no Police, no Soldiers no -- Nothing.

Trump could just start ignoring them completely and what are they gonna do about it? Send him a sternly worded letter??

Leftwing hacks have been overstepping their bounds and elevating themselves to Acting President:

Judge blocks Trump from revoking clearances of firm connected to Russia-collusion hoax




Thousands of fired federal workers must be rehired immediately, judge rules









Trump is demanding that the Supreme Court rein in the hacks.

Gentle correction. Trump has no authority to demand SCOTUS do anything and he knows that. He wouldn't do that. However, having standing and petitioning the High Court for a ruling is perfectly within his prerogative and that is what he is doing.

The Courts also have no constitutional authority over either Congress or the Executive Branch. It would be helpful if SCOTUS was able to remind them of that.

 

[Lesh]

Gentle correction. Trump has no authority to demand SCOTUS do anything and he knows that. He wouldn't do that. However, having standing and petitioning the High Court for a ruling is perfectly within his prerogative and that is what he is doing.

The Courts also have no constitutional authority over either Congress or the Executive Branch. It would be helpful if SCOTUS was able to remind them of that.

While your first paragraph is substantially correct your second is way off.

The Court can absolute rule that Executive actions and laws passed by Congress are unconstitutional

 

[WEATHER53]

It’s depressing to see one random judge somewhere thwart POTUS. It’s also entirely UnAmerican .
How often do judges declare acts of Congress impermissible ?????

 

[Delldude]

A. Not all courts are as compromised as the SCOTUS

How is Scotus compromised?

You must mean the three on the left who often make opinions based on politics, rather than the constitutional interpretations from the majority.

B. On what basis? And stop whining winning and just say thank you.

FIFY

 

[Foxfyre]

While your first paragraph is substantially correct your second is way off.

The Court can absolute rule that Executive actions and laws passed by Congress are unconstitutional

Ruling that something is unconstitutional though is not authority over Congress or the Executive Branch. It only advises a responsible Congress and/or Executive Branch that it should change a policy or law. And a corrupt court system should be challenged every time they erroneously declare something is unconstitutional. And a corrupt Democrat Party should not be able to use a corrupt court system to accomplish what they cannot convince Congress to legislate or the President to set as policy.

The courts were never intended to be able to make law. They are given authority to try those who break the law, to mediate disputes and interpret the letter and intent of the law.

 

[Foxfyre]

It’s depressing to see one random judge somewhere thwart POTUS. It’s also entirely UnAmerican .
How often do judges declare acts of Congress impermissible ?????

The Courts are not given authority to make law. They are the means by which the existing law is enforced by trying people for breaking the existing law. They can mediate disputes. And they can interpret what the letter and intent of the law is though a corrupt court will do that corruptly.

They are not given authority to tell Congress or the Executive Branch what they can and cannot do. The court cannot legally indict or try the President for any crime. The only constitutional discipline of the President is given to Congress and it is restricted to the impeachment process only.

 

[Edgetho]

Gentle correction. Trump has no authority to demand SCOTUS do anything and he knows that. He wouldn't do that. However, having standing and petitioning the High Court for a ruling is perfectly within his prerogative and that is what he is doing.

The Courts also have no constitutional authority over either Congress or the Executive Branch. It would be helpful if SCOTUS was able to remind them of that.

The Courts don't have jurisdiction over what they haven't bothered to give themselves jurisdiction over.

Here's the deal, if POTUS says the Courts don't have jurisdiction -- Who decides that?

The Courts.

If the Courts want jurisdiction over something, they simply take it. That, my Dear Sir, is what's called a dictatorship.

If they want to avoid, defer, evade or otherwise re-make the law, they simply Rule that it is so.

If they want to Tell POTUS what to do, they just rule that they have the power to do just that.

If SCOTUS wants to tell POTUS what to do, they simply rule that they have the power to do so. If they want to block legislation, they simply rule they have the power to do so.

Am I painting a picture yet?

Politicians, Congresscritters, Presidents, Senators, Gubners, etc are all ELECTED to Office BY THE PEOPLE. And they can be removed by The People.

The Founding Fathers entrusted the Judicial Branch to do the right thing and gave them unprecendented protections to do so, believing that if they were given such protections, they wouldn't go political on us.

But they have. Badly. VERY badly. Really BADLY.

When you have a pipsqueak Judge in Bum **** Sang Frang usurp the powers of the Presidency, something has to be done.

If SCOTUS is too gutless to rein-in their activist Judges, then we have a problem. Well, not 'we' so much as the Judiciary.

It was debated in this Country that we might be better off without a Judiciary. It can be debated again.

I'm not sure I would like it without a Judiciary but it would be better than our current highly politicized Judiciary.

Our apolitical 'Judiciary' has issued more TRO's (temporaryrestrainingorders) on OMB in his first 40 days than they did on Sponge Brains Shits Pants in hiss first 3 years.

Something stinks here and it ain't in Denmark

 

[WEATHER53]

Funny no judge trying to overrule and take precedent over Congress.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump promised retribution
No democratic candidate ran on that.

They will in 2028.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Then you have a link for that? or is it TDS spill over cult talk?...

He does not need a link.

You will find no such campaign ad for that.

You will in 2028.

 

[22lcidw]

So you’re saying that the Trump election supersedes the Constitution?

His election supersedes low level judges making law. Especially crazy radical communists.

 

[Edgetho]

Funny no judge trying to overrule and take precedent over Congress.

Judicial Review.

They do it all the time.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The Courts don't have jurisdiction over what they haven't bothered to give themselves jurisdiction over.

Here's the deal, if POTUS says the Courts don't have jurisdiction -- Who decides that?

The Courts.

If the Courts want jurisdiction over something, they simply take it. That, my Dear Sir, is what's called a dictatorship.

If they want to avoid, defer, evade or otherwise re-make the law, they simply Rule that it is so.

If they want to Tell POTUS what to do, they just rule that they have the power to do just that.

If SCOTUS wants to tell POTUS what to do, they simply rule that they have the power to do so. If they want to block legislation, they simply rule they have the power to do so.

Am I painting a picture yet?

Politicians, Congresscritters, Presidents, Senators, Gubners, etc are all ELECTED to Office BY THE PEOPLE. And they can be removed by The People.

The Founding Fathers entrusted the Judicial Branch to do the right thing and gave them unprecendented protections to do so, believing that if they were given such protections, they wouldn't go political on us.

But they have. Badly. VERY badly. Really BADLY.

When you have a pipsqueak Judge in Bum **** Sang Frang usurp the powers of the Presidency, something has to be done.

If SCOTUS is too gutless to rein-in their activist Judges, then we have a problem. Well, not 'we' so much as the Judiciary.

It was debated in this Country that we might be better off without a Judiciary. It can be debated again.

I'm not sure I would like it without a Judiciary but it would be better than our current highly politicized Judiciary.

Our apolitical 'Judiciary' has issued more TRO's (temporaryrestrainingorders) on OMB in his first 40 days than they did on Sponge Brains Shits Pants in hiss first 3 years.

Something stinks here and it ain't in Denmark

Yeah, they do, edge.

They are the umpires.

If you don't like a ruling, appeal.

That is your sole response legally.

 

[Edgetho]

Wanna get blown away?

Check out this SHIT --

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/projects-series/trumps-first-100-days/tracking-trump-administration-litigation

 

[Mac-7]

Trump was elected... Judges are not... they had better remember that because its the courts that hold things together... when the people see the courts as an adversary that is standing in the way of our presidents agenda and what we voted for the courts will be completely ignored... what are they going to do?.... courts have no army or police force so Judges a warning to you... do not lose our respect... you are inching very close to that....

Plus, trump has term limits, judges are appointed for life

Maybe the woke lib partisan democrats judges are not taking bribes, which is an impeachable offense, but they are a threat to our democracy through judicial malfeasence