Trump Demands Supreme Court Rein In Lawless Leftwing Tyrants in Judge's Robes

[HikerGuy83]

A Democratic victory next year would become inevitable.

That would result in an impeachment and a possible conviction.

The wild card would be the military.

 

[BULLDOG]

He got them to the table... China may end up with an agreement before the EU from what I hear...

Has China refused to discuss trade before? When?

 

[scruffy]

You have the say of what laws are made if you are a congressman, if not, you are just another anonymous ranting guy on the internet. .

I'm a voter. I decide who represents me. Then I bend their ear to get what I want. That's the way it's worked for 250 years. Quite well, I might add.

The Supreme Court determines what the words in that law mean.

How can they do that if they don't know what a woman is?

 

[BULLDOG]

Judges can only interpret EXISTING law.

They are explicitly forbidden from creating new law. Which includes "orders" that have nothing to do with existing law.

They can and do make orders based on existing law. Always have. Always will.

 

[BULLDOG]

WRONG.

I and only I decide whether I'm going to obey the law.

Generally I do, because I get something in return.

That is your choice. You also have to face the consequences of your choice

 

[BULLDOG]

Oh pipe down... you didn't even know Trump lowered their tariffs... in fact you also don't know that very few tariffs have been started.... you don't know enough to debate this subject dude... watch FOX news for just two weeks...

I know nothing was gained against China by all trump's childish antics. What trade advantage do we have over China that we didn't have before all this silliness?

 

[BULLDOG]

I'm a voter. I decide who represents me. Then I bend their ear to get what I want. That's the way it's worked for 250 years. Quite well, I might add.



How can they do that if they don't know what a woman is?

When you elect a congressman, you give him your authority to make laws. You can vote him out the next election if you don't like what he does with that authority, but as long as he holds that position, it's his authority to wield.

 

[scruffy]

They can and do make orders based on existing law. Always have. Always will.

That is their scope - EXISTING law.

Which means first and foremost, they have to know what the law is.

Unlike the brainless moron who "ordered" a 21 day waiting period for deportations, when the existing law explicitly says 10.

JUDGES ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PULL LAWS OUT OF THEIR BUTTS. THEY'RE NOT ALLOWED TO CHANGE THE LAW.

 

[Rawley]

Only under the auspices of the of the Supreme court, which ultimately decides.

?? Never heard of the Federal Regulations?

 

[WEATHER53]

Judges can only interpret EXISTING law.

They are explicitly forbidden from creating new law. Which includes "orders" that have nothing to do with existing law.

Plus rarely does Trump get a chance to respond. The petulant law breakers simply “don’t like him” as their basis

 

[whitehall]

The Supreme Court is an equal branch of the federal government and the President has no power to demand anything of them. Trump lawyers present a case just like anyone else. Ironically the last politician to demand anything of the Court was democrat senator Schumer who organized a mob to surround the homes of Supreme Court Justices when he was unhappy with a decision.. The jury is still out on whether Schumer will face charges relating to an attempt on Justice Kav's life.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

These Obama judges are trying to slow Trump down... and they will but only for a short while... a new version of Lawfare... and the people do not like it... so just like Merchan got Trump re elected these dumbshits will get Vance and Rubio elected for two terms.... you can't win this way... you have to get the people on your side and your side keeps chasing them away...and I'm loving it...

This is not lawfare, as you are going to learn and earn with copious amounts of tears.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The "liberation tariffs" are permanently enjoined now, and I am going to score in the market tomorrow like Trump did several weeks ago with his machinations.

 

[Rambunctious]

This is not lawfare, as you are going to learn and earn with copious amounts of tears.

I'm going to thank you... thanks for being so crazy that you gave Trump a majority and got him re elected....

 

[Rambunctious]

I know nothing was gained against China by all trump's childish antics. What trade advantage do we have over China that we didn't have before all this silliness?

Right now they are discussing new trade rules... will it be easy.... no... will it take time... yes... but do not bet against us... this adjustment is long overdue... we are tired of getting screwed around the world...

 

[Rambunctious]

Has China refused to discuss trade before? When?

At first they were defiant... but it was for show... they are a proud group of commies and they know their population will abandon them if they seem weak... but they ultimately need the American people to buy their shit... we are the largest buying group that ever existed....

 

[Clipper]

These Obama judges are trying to slow Trump down... and they will but only for a short while... a new version of Lawfare... and the people do not like it... so just like Merchan got Trump re elected these dumbshits will get Vance and Rubio elected for two terms.... you can't win this way... you have to get the people on your side and your side keeps chasing them away...and I'm loving it...

Some of the judges who are ruling against your boy were appointed by HIM.

 

[Rambunctious]

Some of the judges who are ruling against your boy were appointed by HIM.

link....

 

[Clipper]

link....

So you want a link? Do you actually bleeeeve that all Federal judges were appointed by Obama?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

?? Never heard of the Federal Regulations?

Quiet there until you know what you are talking about.