Trump Demands Supreme Court Rein In Lawless Leftwing Tyrants in Judge's Robes

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Misinformation
Two times the Supreme Court took action vs Trump.
The justices did not give Trump’s administration what it sought. The court rejected the Republican administration’s position that it had the immediate power to fire the head of a watchdog office. In the other, the court slowed the effort to block the release of up to $2 billion in foreign aid.

In the end, the short-term losses for the administration may mean little, and the court’s actions arguably reflect less about whether Trump was right or wrong in either case.

That is just your silly allegations about what did not happen.

Let Trump follow the court's advice on the law, and I will support that.

But a rogue President? Never.

 

[BULLDOG]

Laws are subject to interpretation.

And judge are charged with that interpretation. Not the president.

 

[M14 Shooter]

And judge are charged with that interpretation. Not the president.

Enforcing and/or executing the law inherently requires an interpretation of the law.

 

[WEATHER53]

It’s so absurd that the rogues in robes not only feel they control POTUS but other nations as well
We look foolish

 

[WEATHER53]

Enforcing and/or executing the law inherently requires an interpretation of the law.

Stop and go need no interpretation
The law as written came from interpretation and any more of such is altering the law rather than enforcing it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Stop and go need no interpretation

How about "easily modified"?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It’s so absurd that the rogues in robes not only feel they control POTUS but other nations as well
We look foolish

You look foolish if you believe judges do not adjudicate what the law is and says.

 

[Rambunctious]

I just picked this up at AOSHQ just now. It seemed appropriate --

Learning the wrong lesson, annoying as it can be for those who didn't learn the wrong lesson, is forgivable. The person who learned the wrong lesson did at least try to learn a lesson, though he came to the wrong conclusion. His is an error of knowledge and is thus correctable so long as he is sincere in his attempt to learn. Learning the wrong lesson on purpose is not forgivable but there is something still worse: refusing to learn at all.

Fine words and true... everyone is guilty of this at some point...

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Stop and go need no interpretation
The law as written came from interpretation and any more of such is altering the law rather than enforcing it.

Word salad.

I promise all of you the judges are not listening to the WEATHER53s of the universe.

 

[Rambunctious]

145% tariffs on China.

Delayed tariffs on EU.

It was in all the papers.

I'm telling you. Memory retention of a goldfish, you have.



Stability. As simple as that.

So your choice of news media didn't inform you that Trump lowered China's tariffs when they came to the table???
See what I mean about your sources of information?....

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So your choice of news media didn't inform you that Trump lowered China's tariffs when they came to the table???
See what I mean about your sources of information?....

Trump is not rational is the point.

He is not playing 3D chess. He has trouble with jacks or a yo you.

 

[Rambunctious]

Trump is not rational is the point.

He is not playing 3D chess. He has trouble with jacks or a yo you.

Trump is doing great... you must view the same news as G5000....

 

[WEATHER53]

Word salad.

I promise all of you the judges are not listening to the WEATHER53s of the universe.

Jibber jabber
You feel a judge could “interpret” your red light running if you are headed to the welfare office and it’s near closing time

 

[WEATHER53]

So your choice of news media didn't inform you that Trump lowered China's tariffs when they came to the table???
See what I mean about your sources of information?....

Trump mastered overkill and they bit

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Jibber jabber
You feel a judge could “interpret” your red light running if you are headed to the welfare office and it’s near closing time

I know you will obey the judges, or else. You are no revolutionary hero.

 

[BULLDOG]

Enforcing and/or executing the law inherently requires an interpretation of the law.

No. The courts, and only the courts interpret the law.

 

[g5000]

So your choice of news media didn't inform you that Trump lowered China's tariffs when they came to the table???
See what I mean about your sources of information?....

They came to the table? Is that what your propagandists are telling you?

What, they flattered Trump, as usual, and shook a few hands?

Wall Street is gaming the TACO trade.

Trump makes a stupid threat, the stock market dips.

Wall Street buys the dip, then profits when TACO Trump backs down.

 

[M14 Shooter]

No. The courts, and only the courts interpret the law.

Check your skirt - your ignorance is showing.

National Firearms Act 1934, definitions:
For the purposes of the National Firearms Act the term Machinegun means:
-Any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger
-The frame or receiver of any such weapon
-Any part designed and intended solely and exclusively or combination of parts designed and intended for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun, or
-Any combination of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person.

When enforcing the law, who interprets the law as to the meaning of "can be readily restored to shoot"?
Who interprets the law as to the meaning of "designed and intended"?

 

[Rambunctious]

They came to the table? Is that what your propagandists are telling you?

What, they flattered Trump, as usual, and shook a few hands?

Wall Street is gaming the TACO trade.

Trump makes a stupid threat, the stock market dips.

Wall Street buys the dip, then profits when TACO Trump backs down.

They are in discussions as we speak... you really need a new source of information...

 

[BULLDOG]

So your choice of news media didn't inform you that Trump lowered China's tariffs when they came to the table???
See what I mean about your sources of information?....

Both China and the US reduced tariffs and agreed to more discussions. Doesn't look like trump won anything.