Trump Demands Pulitzer Committee 'Rescind' Awards for Russian Collusion Reporting

[WTF19]

Some of the worst trolling ever.

You fuckers have lost your touch

you are the fucker that lost ITS brain---tears ago

 

[WTF19]

not according to the english language,,,

that asshole, is learning chinese----the scum demonRATS have no interest in English, or AMERICA

 

[WTF19]

Hey shitferbrains...

"When it becomes apparent that a Pulitzer Prize-winning work was based on shoddy, dubious, and manifestly false reporting — as is the case here — the Pulitzer Prize Board must react accordingly," he said in his letter."

That's a demand, moron

you really show your stupidity quite well....thanx 4 the laugh

Hey shitferbrains...

"When it becomes apparent that a Pulitzer Prize-winning work was based on shoddy, dubious, and manifestly false reporting — as is the case here — the Pulitzer Prize Board must react accordingly," he said in his letter."

That's a demand, moron

you must mean in the chinese language----you are a fucking retard

 

[surada]

He was never king, he was sabotaged before after taking office. You are still scared shitless.

Trump is pathetic. He has no right to demand anything.

 

[surada]

that asshole, is learning chinese----the scum demonRATS have no interest in English, or AMERICA

Wow.. You sure are ignorant.

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

News. Not one lying democrat can admit to FAKE NEWS.

 

[Crepitus]

you cant be that stupid,, OH WAIT,, you are,,

Sorry kid, I don't live in your echo chamber.

 

[Crepitus]

by the people who gave the awards, as well as the paper that foisted the falsehoods.

LOL, no.

 

[22lcidw]

Our Republic and its Press will rise or fall together.....Joseph Pulitzer. I say to you.....our Republic died years ago.

 

[martybegan]

LOL, no.

Um, yes.

If they had any integrity they would fess up to being hoodwinked by political operators.

 

[wamose]

Trump is right again. If it was acceptable to award Pulitzers to liars, nobody but politicians would ever win.

 

[Dana7360]

• 1.be obliged to; should (expressing necessity):"you must show your ID card"

That's a fucking DEMAND stupid

Why are you arguing with an idiot over a word?

That person is just a troll.

That idiot is arguing over a word. That tells all intelligent people that person is an idiot troll and just trying to derail the thread.

The best thing to do is just scroll right past it's posts.

It doesn't have anything to contribute to the thread.

 

[progressive hunter]

Sorry kid, I don't live in your echo chamber.

not sure about that,, but I know you cant read,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Why are you arguing with an idiot over a word?

That person is just a troll.

That idiot is arguing over a word. That tells all intelligent people that person is an idiot troll and just trying to derail the thread.

The best thing to do is just scroll right past it's posts.

It doesn't have anything to contribute to the thread.

because words have meanings,,

 

[BlindBoo]

Trumpybear thinks his followers are moroonies.

Mueller proved collusion between the Trump Campaign and Russians.

However as Mueller said from the very beginning, there is no crime called collusion with Russians.

Trumpyberra is funny. I hope he holds his breath until they rescind it.

 

[Dana7360]

Trumpybear thinks his followers are moroonies.

Mueller proved collusion between the Trump Campaign and Russians.

However as Mueller said from the very beginning, there is no crime called collusion with Russians.

Trumpyberra is funny. I hope he holds his breath until they rescind it.

He sure does have a lot of nerve.

 

[Batcat]

I doubt if the Pulitzer Prizes will be revoked. They should however be moved to the “Best Fiction” category.

 

[Batcat]

Trumpybear thinks his followers are moroonies.

Mueller proved collusion between the Trump Campaign and Russians.

However as Mueller said from the very beginning, there is no crime called collusion with Russians.

Trumpyberra is funny. I hope he holds his breath until they rescind it.

According to the American Bar Association Mueller did NOT prove collusion between the Trump campaign and Putin.

Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.

www.americanbar.org

***snip***

The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

As far as obstruction, the Mueller report laid out facts on both sides but did not reach a conclusion. Barr’s letter said that “the Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’”

But Barr said that he and Rosenstein "have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."

 

[BlindBoo]

According to the American Bar Association Mueller did NOT prove collusion between the Trump campaign and Putin.

Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.

www.americanbar.org

***snip***

The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

As far as obstruction, the Mueller report laid out facts on both sides but did not reach a conclusion. Barr’s letter said that “the Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’”

But Barr said that he and Rosenstein "have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense."

That was an article about Barr's 4 page letter. Mueller found lots of collusion between Russians and the Trump campaign. He couldn't prove those Russians had ties to the Russian Government and could not prove a criminal conspiracy.

 

[Batcat]

That was an article about Barr's 4 page letter. Mueller found lots of collusion between Russians and the Trump campaign. He couldn't prove those Russians had ties to the Russian Government and could not prove a criminal conspiracy.

Some argue that it was Hillary who colluded with the Russians. There are some rumors that the Special Investigator John Durham may be planning to implicate Hillary. (Of course Hillary is immune to anything Durham will try as she is above the rule of law.)

The Only 2016 Campaign That Colluded With Russia Was Hillary Clinton's

There was Russian collusion during the 2016 presidential campaign, but it didn't come from Donald Trump. The actual collusion came from Hillary Clinton.

thefederalist.com

***snip***

The former director of the Central Intelligence Agency publicly declared Trump to be guilty of treason, an offense punishable by death. The former head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the country’s premier law enforcement agency, intimated that the president had illegally obstructed justice.

In the end, none of it was true. After a nearly two-year-long investigation that issued 2,800 subpoenas, interviewed 500 witnesses, and used nearly 300 wiretaps and pen registers, Special Counsel Robert Mueller concluded that there was no evidence of collusion by Trump or his associates.

But that doesn’t mean 2016 was free of Russian collusion. To the contrary, there is clear evidence that a 2016 presidential campaign willfully and deliberately colluded with Russians in a bid to interfere with American elections. It wasn’t Trump’s campaign that colluded with shady Russia oligarchs and sketchy Russian sources to subvert American democracy: it was Hillary Clinton’s.

Durham Indicts Former Clinton Attorney for Allegedly Lying to the FBI

John Durham has indicted former Hillary Clinton attorney Michael Sussmann for allegedly lying to the FBI in 2016.

www.breitbart.com

***snip***

Based on questions that John Durham has asked witnesses in recent months, the Times concluded his team is “pursuing a theory that the Clinton campaign used Perkins Coie to submit dubious information to the FBI about Russia and Mr. Trump in an effort to gin up investigative activity to hurt his 2016 campaign.”