Not even Biden disputes that it was Shokin that he got fired, moron.
Of course. Firing Shokin was US foreign policy backed up by the EU and UN. How stupid are you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not even Biden disputes that it was Shokin that he got fired, moron.
There were no points made in the opinion piece. And you can’t support the implicit claim it made even though you are the one citing it and thereby adopting it.In other words, you couldn't dispute any of the points made in the article? Yeah, figured as much.
Trumptards are big on bluster and short on facts. Thanks for proving my point.
That would be Viktor Shokin, a prosecutor that was widely regarded as corrupt both in and out of Ukraine to the point that the US State Dept personnel in Ukraine asked the administration to help to work to have him dismissed.Which prosecutor did Brandon brag about having fired via the threat of withholding $1 billion worth of US loan guarantees?
Also backed by the international monetary fund.Of course. Firing Shokin was US foreign policy backed up by the EU and UN. How stupid are you?
I had no idea I needed to specify what office Biden left in Jan 2017. I assumed you were vaguely familiar with who has been president and Vice President.Oh. Vice President was the office you unclearly “meant.” Sure.
Actually, it does. But you wouldn’t recognize that fact with a flow chart at the ready.
Ask an intelligent adult friend to assist you. Obviously, this is all far above you.
It appears you missed the point.Not even Biden disputes that it was Shokin that he got fired, moron.
“Everyone” knows Hunter is guilty but no one knows what he is guilty of.Uhuh. No one thinks Hunter isnt guilty. You can attempt to lie about it, but no one will believe you.
It was Biden policy to cover his ass. Only suckers believe your spin on the matter.Of course. Firing Shokin was US foreign policy backed up by the EU and UN. How stupid are you?
No I didn't.It appears you missed the point.
Yes. It was Shokin. You’re making progress.That would be Viktor Shokin, a prosecutor that was widely regarded as corrupt both in and out of Ukraine to the point that the US State Dept personnel in Ukraine asked the administration to help to work to have him dismissed.
Your article that you mysteriously linked to is about Konstantin Kulyk. Up until now you’ve given no indication you have any idea Shokin even existed.Yes. It was Shokin. You’re making progress.
I assume you’re a retard and had forgotten that Biden wasn’t then President.I had no idea I needed to specify what office Biden left in Jan 2017. I assumed you were vaguely familiar with who has been president and Vice President.
Your hunches are as valueless as most everything you lost.Being evasive is a sign of weakness, and I have a hunch you’re doing so to cover up your lack of actual knowledge. The prosecutor Biden worked to be dismissed is Viktor Shokin. That is what Trump was asking Zelensky to pretend to investigate in his infamous phone call.
LOL You keep claiming it is an opinion piece. It's not. It is a news analysis. With links to back up the statements they made.There were no points made in the opinion piece. And you can’t support the implicit claim it made even though you are the one citing it and thereby adopting it.
Your burden shifting effort is fully exposed already.
But it’s ok. I never expected a libtard such as you to support any of its contentions.
You idiots are very plodding and predictable like that.
I quoted the portion of it I asked you to support. The piece doesn’t appear to do so.LOL You keep claiming it is an opinion piece. It's not. It is a news analysis. With links to back up the statements they made.
But hey, prove me wrong. Prove that:
- This is an opinion piece and
- They got the facts wrong
Go ahead, retard. Let's see what you got. Let's see if you can disprove any of the points made in the article. You are a coward and a retard and so you won't. But, hey, surprise me.
And why are we going to take the word of a prosecutor widely regarded as corrupt inside and outside of Ukraine?I assume you’re a retard and had forgotten that Biden wasn’t then President.
Your hunches are as valueless as most everything you lost.
I will assist you since you seem unable to help yourself.
Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show
Ex-Ukraine prosecutor said he was told to back off probe of Biden-linked firm, files show
Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at http://www.foxnews.com/apps-products/index.html.
Pathetic deflection effort.And why are we going to take the word of a prosecutor widely regarded as corrupt inside and outside of Ukraine?
Other than the fact that it’s politically convenient.
I know what he said. Do you think it’s impossible for him to be untruthful?Pathetic deflection effort.
It’s what he said. Do you actually imagine that those he spoke about would admit it?
Nothin from the timeline to the other facts support your position.
Was Shokin actually corrupt? Or was he simply labeled “corrupt” by those he was trying to investigate?
For example: Our incumbent President is widely seen as being very corrupt. Since that’s true, I suppose YOU will now reject anything he has to say. Is that true? Or am I off base here? Because If I’m off base here, then your standards seem to be reliably only double.