StatesRightsForever
Diamond Member
- May 1, 2024
- 3,285
- 4,350
- 1,938
- Thread starter
- #21
Trump didn't do it so what are you talking about? THINKAnd is there any doubt that, if Trump had done exactly the same thing, you'd be cheering?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump didn't do it so what are you talking about? THINKAnd is there any doubt that, if Trump had done exactly the same thing, you'd be cheering?
Trump didn't do it so what are you talking about? THINK
Not even Apples and OrangesThe press blasts trump for doing what they gladly let Biden do. Biden was told repeatedly by the courts he could not cancel student debt, but he did it over and over and even bragged, "The Supreme Court blocked it but that didn't stop me." The press cheered him for that.
It's a hypothetical. Are you familiar with the concept of a hypothetical? It usually involves the word "if", and then proposes a scenario for discussion.Trump didn't do it so what are you talking about? THINK
It didn't really matter, did it? Voters didn't "cheer".
The background here is that President Biden announced in August 2022 that he planned to take executive action to cancel $10,000 in federal student loan debt for most borrowers.
His stated justification for doing so was the Higher Education Relief Opportunities For Students (HEROES) Act of 2002, which allows the Secretary of Education to “waive or modify” provisions of federal student loan law “as the Secretary deems necessary in connection with a war or other military operation or national emergency.”
As I’ve written before, if you read the law, it’s fairly clear that the statute’s intent was to benefit members of the military (the law’s titular “heroes”), but regardless, the Biden administration argued that the text was broad enough to allow a much wider cancellation (with Covid-19 as the relevant “national emergency”).
To make a long story short, the Supreme Court did not agree, ruling 6-3 in June 2023 that the Biden administration’s cancellation went beyond the allowable “waiving and modifying” and instead constituted an “exhaustive rewriting of the statute.”
After the ruling, the Biden administration did not carry forward with the program, but did try to relieve student loan debt in several other ways.
![]()
No, Biden didn’t defy the Supreme Court on student loans
And neither did Trump on TikTok!www.wakeuptopolitics.com
No, Biden didn’t defy the Supreme Court on student loans
And neither did Trump on TikTok!

Why did the press let Biden defy the Supreme Court but won't let trump.?
Yer kidding, right?![]()
PERSECUTION RIGHTWING IDENTITY "Awake Not Woke": How Republicans Are Defining Their Party in 2022"wakeuptopolitics.com"![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
.Weren't students just informed that their debts will be referred to debt collectors?
I believe we have a recent thread on it.
That normally happens when debtors do not pay their bills.Weren't students just informed that their debts will be referred to debt collectors?
I believe we have a recent thread on it.
And is there any doubt that, if Trump had done exactly the same thing, you'd be cheering?
.
And if so, it's your job to post a link to it.
.
That normally happens when debtors do not pay their bills.
.There is a recent thread.
The court blocked particular programsThe press blasts trump for doing what they gladly let Biden do. Biden was told repeatedly by the courts he could not cancel student debt, but he did it over and over and even bragged, "The Supreme Court blocked it but that didn't stop me." The press cheered him for that.
And if so, it's your job to post a link to it.
The background here is that President Biden announced in August 2022 that he planned to take executive action to cancel $10,000 in federal student loan debt for most borrowers.
His stated justification for doing so was the Higher Education Relief Opportunities For Students (HEROES) Act of 2002, which allows the Secretary of Education to “waive or modify” provisions of federal student loan law “as the Secretary deems necessary in connection with a war or other military operation or national emergency.”
As I’ve written before, if you read the law, it’s fairly clear that the statute’s intent was to benefit members of the military (the law’s titular “heroes”), but regardless, the Biden administration argued that the text was broad enough to allow a much wider cancellation (with Covid-19 as the relevant “national emergency”).
To make a long story short, the Supreme Court did not agree, ruling 6-3 in June 2023 that the Biden administration’s cancellation went beyond the allowable “waiving and modifying” and instead constituted an “exhaustive rewriting of the statute.”
After the ruling, the Biden administration did not carry forward with the program, but did try to relieve student loan debt in several other ways.
But, but, but Jim "Gymboy" Jordan said...The court blocked particular programs
Biden abided by those rulings and tried different programs
The Court never said “you can not forgive student loans under any circumstances “
The court blocked particular programs
Biden abided by those rulings and tried different programs
The Court never said “you can not forgive student loans under any circumstances “