Trump can end fraudulent birthright citizenship bestowed on illegals offspring

But when they reach 21 they can sponsor their whole family in centersl America, goats and sll

So ut is a serious threat to America
Jeez, there are limits and quotas on legal immigration.....don't you know that? The numbers of allowance, the quotas of foreigners legally allowed in to the USA, are historically low.
 
Thanks to Godless libs and the separation of church and state that is s question that no longer needs an answer

Your little game of having it both ways no longer applies
I'm not having anything both ways....

(I'm sure Jesus appreciates you being honest about Him not mattering to YOU anymore...because of Democrats)
 
Last edited:
If libs are truly concerned about the future of social services for aging Americans as they pretend to be they will notice that adding 100 million poor people from around the world must take away benefits from Americans
 
I'm not having anything both ways....
You are trying

The left hates conservative Christians and insists they have no influence over governmrnt policy

Except when it suits your agenda and then you cry WWJD?
 
Jeez, there are limits and quotas on legal immigration.....don't you know that? The numbers of allowance, the quotas of foreigners legally allowed in to the USA, are historically low.
Limits that bleeding heart libs can ignore when they are in power again

Which they will be someday
 
So you endorse a THEOCRACY where this nation is goverened by the Christian Bible?
I don't view Jesus's teachings as theocratic, for the most part....he was teaching us good wisdom....which goes beyond an IQ test score..... He taught about self reflection, in His parables....

like who did the right thing....the Levite and Priest who traveled by the dying stranger, (likely for some religious reason regarding the uncleanliness of blood?) Or the Samaritan man who stopped and helped the beat up, and dying stranger?

Was it just, for the men to stone the adultress to death, for breaking the laws on adultery as their law called for, without examining themselves first? Or to try to take the sawdust out of another's eye, without having to remove the wood plank out of their own before doing such....
 
Law spinners are everywhere....that's why the supreme court was final judge on constitutionally....in the Ark decision....

And what is the significance of the Wong Kim Ark decision?
 
Despite all the yelling above, Trump has no inherent power in Executive Orders to do anything about anchor baby citizenship.
 
Despite all the yelling above, Trump has no inherent power in Executive Orders to do anything about anchor baby citizenship.

Why are you yelling that a president of the United States has no inherent power to set new "policy" regarding citizenship being granted to the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national born on American soil?

See: Here’s how Pres. Trump can end Birthright Citizenship… scroll to “Using Administrative Authority”.
 
The President has no executive power in ending anchor baby citizenship.

This is a power he does not have.

He can go to his constitutional lawyers to see what can be done, johnwk.
 
The President has no executive power in ending anchor baby citizenship.

This is a power he does not have.

He can go to his constitutional lawyers to see what can be done, johnwk.

Thank you for your opinion.

A president can change existing policy, not existing law. Existing policy, not law, recognizes the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national born on American soil as a citizen of the United States.

See: Here’s how Pres. Trump can end Birthright Citizenship… scroll to “Using Administrative Authority”.
 
15th post
Thank you for your opinion.

A president can change existing policy, not existing law. Existing policy, not law, recognizes the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national born on American soil as a citizen of the United States.

See: Here’s how Pres. Trump can end Birthright Citizenship… scroll to “Using Administrative Authority”.
I'm glad we're finally going to get to find out if you soft whites have the courage to do it. :lol:
 
I'm glad we're finally going to get to find out if you soft whites have the courage to do it. :lol:
soft whites

1733602000581.webp
 
Thank you for your opinion.

A president can change existing policy, not existing law. Existing policy, not law, recognizes the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national born on American soil as a citizen of the United States.

See: Here’s how Pres. Trump can end Birthright Citizenship… scroll to “Using Administrative Authority”.
It's law that offspring born here to foreign nationals born here are citizens.

It is not policy. No judge will accept such silliness.

You are citing merely an opinion from NumbersUSA, "which is an organization that advocates for reducing both legal and illegal immigration to the United States2. Founded by Roy Beck in 1996, the group focuses on educating the public, policymakers, and opinion leaders about the impacts of high immigration levels3. They aim to restore immigration numbers to traditional levels to ensure long-term U.S. sustainability."
 
Last edited:
It's law that offspring born here to foreign nationals born here are citizens.

It is not policy.


Quote the statutory law verbatim and provide its citation.

Existing policy, not law, recognizes the offspring of an illegal entrant foreign national born on American soil as a citizen of the United States.
 
Back
Top Bottom