Trump can end fraudulent birthright citizenship bestowed on illegals offspring

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It certainly is true, Trump can end fraudulent birthright citizenship being bestowed on the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals, as he has done with his EXECUTIVE ORDER (PROTECTING THE MEANING AND VALUE OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP).


The bottom line for rejecting the lawsuit against Trump’s PROTECTING THE MEANING AND VALUE OF AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP is, to date Congress has not exercised its exclusive power under the Fourteenth Amendment to recognize and grant citizenship to the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born on American soil, nor has there been a Supreme Court case called to decide if a child born on American soil to an illegal entrant foreign national is a U.S. citizen upon birth. The truth of the matter is, mere current and unwritten policy, not law, now recognizes them as such.
Elections have consequences, and part of the consequences of an election allows the setting new public policy . . . this is a fundamental hallmark of our constitutionally limited "Republican Form of Government" guaranteed by our Constitution.

That is not a presidential prerogative.

An election does not give him such a power.

 

[johnwk]

That is not a presidential prerogative.

An election does not give him such a power.

The Constitution gives our president administrative powers which includes setting new public policy.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The Constitution gives our president administrative powers which includes setting new public policy.

In accordance with law and the Constitution, which the courts will decide not the executive.

 

[johnwk]

In accordance with law and the Constitution, which the courts will decide not the executive.

Yes. In accordance with our rule of law system.

Why Trump’s birthright citizenship Executive Order is constitutional​

.


Under the 14th Amendment’s, Section 5, Congress has exclusive power to enforce its provisions by “appropriate legislation” and did so under the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924. As we speak, there is no S.C. Case, or Act of Congress by which citizenship is recognized for the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born while on American soil. Doing so is mere unwritten federal policy.


Under Article 2 of our Constitution, our President gets to exercise administrative policy changes, such as was exercised by Biden with his disastrous and destructive open border policy.


This policy making authority of our President, is a hallmark of our Republican Form of Government, which also provides for elections in order to accommodate change of existing public policy, as determined by the people through elections.


Since our Constitution does not grant citizenship to the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born while on American soil, nor has Congress acted to grant such citizenship, or does a Supreme Court case exist in which this question was explicitly presented to our Supreme Court for consideration and affirmed such citizenship, and that mere federal policy has recognized the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born while on American soil as citizens of the United States, President Trump is free to exercise his administrative policy-making power, so long as it does not violate any provisions of our Constitution, and he may change existing federal policy which has recognized the offspring of illegal entrant foreign nationals born while on American soil as citizens of the United States upon birth.


Our S.C. does not have to get involved, nor should it! It should only confirm, elections have consequences, and our President has power to change existing public policy.

Elections have consequences!



JWK

“If aliens might be admitted indiscriminately to enjoy all the rights of citizens at the will of a single state, the Union might itself be endangered by an influx of foreigners, hostile to its institutions, ignorant of its powers, and incapable of a due estimate of its privileges." - Joseph Story

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No, johnwk, your opinion is off base, wrong, not right.

SCOTUS will support Ark Wong, not Trump's silliness.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

What are the polls on ending birth right naturalization showing? Do Americans support the principle or not.

Recent polls indicate that a majority of Americans do not support ending birthright citizenship. According to a Quinnipiac University poll, 63% of voters believe that birthright citizenship should remain in place, granting any child born in the U.S. the right to an American passport. Only 29% felt the system should be changed so that those born to noncitizens are not automatically eligible.

Another poll by the Associated Press found that 51% of Americans oppose ending birthright citizenship, while 28% support it. The divide is also evident across the political spectrum, with 73% of Democrats opposing the policy, 53% of Republicans supporting it, and 46% of Independents opposing it.

It seems that while there is some support for ending birthright citizenship, a significant portion of the population believes it should remain as it is.